A smartwatch-based CPR feedback device improves chest compression quality among health care professionals and lay rescuers

IF 2.6 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Cardiovascular digital health journal Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.cvdhj.2024.03.006
Adam S. LaPrad PhD , Bridgid Joseph DPN, RN, CCNS , Sara Chokshi PhD , Kelly Aldrich DNP, MS, RN-BC , David Kessler MD, MSc , Beno W. Oppenheimer MD
{"title":"A smartwatch-based CPR feedback device improves chest compression quality among health care professionals and lay rescuers","authors":"Adam S. LaPrad PhD ,&nbsp;Bridgid Joseph DPN, RN, CCNS ,&nbsp;Sara Chokshi PhD ,&nbsp;Kelly Aldrich DNP, MS, RN-BC ,&nbsp;David Kessler MD, MSc ,&nbsp;Beno W. Oppenheimer MD","doi":"10.1016/j.cvdhj.2024.03.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) quality significantly impacts patient outcomes during cardiac arrests. With advancements in health care technology, smartwatch-based CPR feedback devices have emerged as potential tools to enhance CPR delivery.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study evaluated a novel smartwatch-based CPR feedback device in enhancing chest compression quality among health care professionals and lay rescuers.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A single-center, open-label, randomized crossover study was conducted with 30 subjects categorized into 3 groups based on rescuer category. The Relay Response BLS smartwatch application was compared to a defibrillator-based feedback device (Zoll OneStep CPR Pads). Following an introduction to the technology, subjects performed chest compressions in 3 modules: baseline unaided, aided by the smartwatch-based feedback device, and aided by the defibrillator-based feedback device. Outcome measures included effectiveness, learnability, and usability.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Across all groups, the smartwatch-based device significantly improved mean compression depth effectiveness (68.4% vs 29.7%; <em>P</em> &lt; .05) and mean rate effectiveness (87.5% vs 30.1%; <em>P</em> &lt; .05), compared to unaided compressions. Compression variability was significantly reduced with the smartwatch-based device (coefficient of variation: 14.9% vs 26.6%), indicating more consistent performance. Fifteen of 20 professional rescuers reached effective compressions using the smartwatch-based device in an average 2.6 seconds. A usability questionnaire revealed strong preference for the smartwatch-based device over the defibrillator-based device.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The smartwatch-based device enhances the quality of CPR delivery by keeping compressions within recommended ranges and reducing performance variability. Its user-friendliness and rapid learnability suggest potential for widespread adoption in both professional and lay rescuer scenarios, contributing positively to CPR training and real-life emergency responses.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72527,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular digital health journal","volume":"5 3","pages":"Pages 122-131"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266669362400029X/pdfft?md5=70e80c21c66f84b5799e882cf1629c69&pid=1-s2.0-S266669362400029X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular digital health journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266669362400029X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) quality significantly impacts patient outcomes during cardiac arrests. With advancements in health care technology, smartwatch-based CPR feedback devices have emerged as potential tools to enhance CPR delivery.

Objective

This study evaluated a novel smartwatch-based CPR feedback device in enhancing chest compression quality among health care professionals and lay rescuers.

Methods

A single-center, open-label, randomized crossover study was conducted with 30 subjects categorized into 3 groups based on rescuer category. The Relay Response BLS smartwatch application was compared to a defibrillator-based feedback device (Zoll OneStep CPR Pads). Following an introduction to the technology, subjects performed chest compressions in 3 modules: baseline unaided, aided by the smartwatch-based feedback device, and aided by the defibrillator-based feedback device. Outcome measures included effectiveness, learnability, and usability.

Results

Across all groups, the smartwatch-based device significantly improved mean compression depth effectiveness (68.4% vs 29.7%; P < .05) and mean rate effectiveness (87.5% vs 30.1%; P < .05), compared to unaided compressions. Compression variability was significantly reduced with the smartwatch-based device (coefficient of variation: 14.9% vs 26.6%), indicating more consistent performance. Fifteen of 20 professional rescuers reached effective compressions using the smartwatch-based device in an average 2.6 seconds. A usability questionnaire revealed strong preference for the smartwatch-based device over the defibrillator-based device.

Conclusion

The smartwatch-based device enhances the quality of CPR delivery by keeping compressions within recommended ranges and reducing performance variability. Its user-friendliness and rapid learnability suggest potential for widespread adoption in both professional and lay rescuer scenarios, contributing positively to CPR training and real-life emergency responses.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于智能手表的心肺复苏反馈设备可提高医护人员和非专业救援人员的胸外按压质量
背景心肺复苏(CPR)的质量对心脏骤停患者的预后有重大影响。随着医疗保健技术的进步,基于智能手表的心肺复苏反馈设备已成为提高心肺复苏实施质量的潜在工具。本研究评估了基于智能手表的新型心肺复苏反馈设备在提高医疗保健专业人员和非专业施救者胸外按压质量方面的作用。Relay Response BLS 智能手表应用与除颤仪反馈设备(Zoll OneStep CPR Pads)进行了比较。在对技术进行介绍后,受试者在 3 个模块中进行胸外按压:基线无辅助、基于智能手表的反馈设备辅助和基于除颤仪的反馈设备辅助。结果在所有组别中,与无辅助按压相比,基于智能手表的设备显著提高了平均按压深度效果(68.4% vs 29.7%; P <.05)和平均按压频率效果(87.5% vs 30.1%; P <.05)。基于智能手表的设备大大降低了按压的变异性(变异系数:14.9% vs 26.6%),表明其性能更加稳定。在 20 名专业救援人员中,有 15 人使用智能手表设备在平均 2.6 秒内实现了有效按压。可用性问卷调查显示,与除颤器设备相比,智能手表设备更受青睐。 结论:智能手表设备可将按压次数控制在推荐范围内,并减少性能变化,从而提高心肺复苏的质量。它的用户友好性和快速可学性表明,它有可能在专业和非专业救援人员的场景中得到广泛应用,为心肺复苏培训和现实生活中的应急响应做出积极贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cardiovascular digital health journal
Cardiovascular digital health journal Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
58 days
期刊最新文献
Determinants of global cardiac implantable electrical device remote monitoring utilization – Results from an international survey Cellular-Enabled Remote Patient Monitoring for Pregnancies Complicated by Hypertension Point-of-care testing preferences 2020–2022: Trends over the years Feasibility of remote monitoring for fatal coronary heart disease using Apple Watch ECGs Artificial intelligence–based screening for cardiomyopathy in an obstetric population: A pilot study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1