Factor structure, group invariance, and concurrent validity of scores from the college eating and drinking behavior scale among U.S. college students

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2024-04-01 DOI:10.1016/j.eatbeh.2024.101876
Dylan K. Richards, Matthew R. Pearson, Protective Strategies Study Team
{"title":"Factor structure, group invariance, and concurrent validity of scores from the college eating and drinking behavior scale among U.S. college students","authors":"Dylan K. Richards,&nbsp;Matthew R. Pearson,&nbsp;Protective Strategies Study Team","doi":"10.1016/j.eatbeh.2024.101876","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Food and alcohol disturbance (FAD) refers to the intersection of alcohol- and eating-related motives and behaviors, such as restricting food intake before or during alcohol use to offset caloric intake or to enhance intoxication. Valid assessment is critical for advancing research on FAD. We tested the factor structure, group invariance, and concurrent validity of the College Eating and Drinking Behavior Scale (CEDBS) in a large college student sample (<em>n</em> = 2610; Mage = 20.95, SD = 4.65; 71.8% female; 77% White; 86% non-Hispanic). Participants completed measures assessing antecedents of alcohol use (i.e., protective behavioral strategies and drinking motives), negative alcohol-related consequences, alcohol use severity, and risk for eating disorder. The 3-factor model of the 21-item CEDBS provided an adequate fit to the data (e.g., CFI = 0.916). These factors include Alternative Methods (4 items; “Use laxative prior to drinking alcohol”), Offset Calories (7 items; “Restrict calories prior to drinking to help maintain your figure”), and Quicker Intoxication (10 items; “Not eating before drinking alcohol because it gives you the best buzz”). The CEDBS was scalar invariant across subgroups of participants based on age, sex, race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, sexual orientation, and political orientation. Quicker Intoxication was most strongly related to risk factors and negative consequences for alcohol (<em>r</em> = 0.204–0.379, all <em>p</em>s &lt; 0.01), and Offset Calories was most strongly related to risk for eating disorders (<em>r</em> = 0.349, <em>p</em> &lt; .01). These findings further support the CEDBS to assess FAD among college students.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1471015324000357","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Food and alcohol disturbance (FAD) refers to the intersection of alcohol- and eating-related motives and behaviors, such as restricting food intake before or during alcohol use to offset caloric intake or to enhance intoxication. Valid assessment is critical for advancing research on FAD. We tested the factor structure, group invariance, and concurrent validity of the College Eating and Drinking Behavior Scale (CEDBS) in a large college student sample (n = 2610; Mage = 20.95, SD = 4.65; 71.8% female; 77% White; 86% non-Hispanic). Participants completed measures assessing antecedents of alcohol use (i.e., protective behavioral strategies and drinking motives), negative alcohol-related consequences, alcohol use severity, and risk for eating disorder. The 3-factor model of the 21-item CEDBS provided an adequate fit to the data (e.g., CFI = 0.916). These factors include Alternative Methods (4 items; “Use laxative prior to drinking alcohol”), Offset Calories (7 items; “Restrict calories prior to drinking to help maintain your figure”), and Quicker Intoxication (10 items; “Not eating before drinking alcohol because it gives you the best buzz”). The CEDBS was scalar invariant across subgroups of participants based on age, sex, race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, sexual orientation, and political orientation. Quicker Intoxication was most strongly related to risk factors and negative consequences for alcohol (r = 0.204–0.379, all ps < 0.01), and Offset Calories was most strongly related to risk for eating disorders (r = 0.349, p < .01). These findings further support the CEDBS to assess FAD among college students.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国大学生饮食行为量表的因子结构、群体不变性和并发效度
食物与酒精紊乱(FAD)是指酒精与饮食相关动机和行为的交叉,如在饮酒前或饮酒期间限制食物摄入量,以抵消热量摄入或增强醉酒感。有效的评估对于推进 FAD 研究至关重要。我们在一个大型大学生样本(n = 2610;Mage = 20.95,SD = 4.65;71.8% 女性;77% 白人;86% 非西班牙裔)中测试了大学生饮食行为量表(CEDBS)的因子结构、群体不变性和并发效度。参与者完成了评估饮酒前因(即保护性行为策略和饮酒动机)、与酒精相关的负面后果、饮酒严重程度和饮食失调风险的测量。21 个项目的 CEDBS 的 3 因子模型充分拟合了数据(如 CFI = 0.916)。这些因子包括替代方法(4 个项目;"饮酒前使用泻药")、抵消热量(7 个项目;"饮酒前限制热量以帮助保持身材")和快速中毒(10 个项目;"饮酒前不进食,因为这样能让你感觉最爽")。在不同年龄、性别、种族/民族、社会经济地位、性取向和政治倾向的参与者分组中,CEDBS 具有标度不变性。快速中毒与酗酒的风险因素和负面后果的关系最为密切(r = 0.204-0.379, all ps < 0.01),而抵消卡路里与饮食失调的风险关系最为密切(r = 0.349, p < .01)。这些发现进一步支持用 CEDBS 评估大学生的 FAD。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Sleep Disturbance in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. Advancing Patient Education in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: The Promise of Large Language Models. Anti-Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein Neuropathy: Recent Developments. Approach to Managing the Initial Presentation of Multiple Sclerosis: A Worldwide Practice Survey. Association Between LACE+ Index Risk Category and 90-Day Mortality After Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1