Timing and Toll: Europe’s Excess Mortality in the First Three Years of COVID-19

IF 2.6 3区 社会学 Q1 DEMOGRAPHY Population Research and Policy Review Pub Date : 2024-04-26 DOI:10.1007/s11113-024-09884-5
Ivan Marinković, Marko Galjak
{"title":"Timing and Toll: Europe’s Excess Mortality in the First Three Years of COVID-19","authors":"Ivan Marinković, Marko Galjak","doi":"10.1007/s11113-024-09884-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study examines excess mortality patterns in 32 European countries during the first three years of the pandemic, offering insights into the pandemic’s toll on each country. Using data from national statistical offices, we calculated monthly excess mortality for 2020–2022. Time series decomposition was employed for trend analysis, followed by clustering countries based on their mortality trends. Then we compared total excess mortality among different clusters. We found that neighboring countries with similar characteristics experienced comparable levels of excess mortality, regardless of the differences in their pandemic trajectories identified by cluster analysis. Other factors, such as healthcare infrastructure and pre-existing health risks, appear to have had a more significant impact on total excess mortality, with various pre-existing regional factors playing significant roles in shaping the pandemic’s final toll. While the timing of peak excess mortality may have been a factor, it was not the primary driver of the overall toll. This study highlights the critical need for comprehensive public health strategies that focus on reinforcing healthcare infrastructure and mitigating pre-existing health risks, essential for effective pandemic preparedness and response. These findings suggest the need for reevaluating current approaches and exploring alternative strategies for managing future health emergencies.</p>","PeriodicalId":47633,"journal":{"name":"Population Research and Policy Review","volume":"52 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Population Research and Policy Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-024-09884-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines excess mortality patterns in 32 European countries during the first three years of the pandemic, offering insights into the pandemic’s toll on each country. Using data from national statistical offices, we calculated monthly excess mortality for 2020–2022. Time series decomposition was employed for trend analysis, followed by clustering countries based on their mortality trends. Then we compared total excess mortality among different clusters. We found that neighboring countries with similar characteristics experienced comparable levels of excess mortality, regardless of the differences in their pandemic trajectories identified by cluster analysis. Other factors, such as healthcare infrastructure and pre-existing health risks, appear to have had a more significant impact on total excess mortality, with various pre-existing regional factors playing significant roles in shaping the pandemic’s final toll. While the timing of peak excess mortality may have been a factor, it was not the primary driver of the overall toll. This study highlights the critical need for comprehensive public health strategies that focus on reinforcing healthcare infrastructure and mitigating pre-existing health risks, essential for effective pandemic preparedness and response. These findings suggest the need for reevaluating current approaches and exploring alternative strategies for managing future health emergencies.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
时间与代价:欧洲在 COVID-19 前三年的超额死亡率
本研究探讨了 32 个欧洲国家在大流行病头三年的超额死亡率模式,为了解大流行病对每个国家造成的损失提供了见解。利用国家统计局提供的数据,我们计算了 2020-2022 年的每月超额死亡率。我们采用时间序列分解法进行趋势分析,然后根据各国的死亡率趋势对其进行分组。然后,我们比较了不同分组之间的总超额死亡率。我们发现,具有相似特征的相邻国家的超额死亡率水平相当,与聚类分析确定的大流行病轨迹差异无关。其他因素,如医疗基础设施和原有的健康风险,似乎对超额总死亡率有更重要的影响,各种原有的区域因素在形成大流行病的最终死亡人数方面发挥了重要作用。虽然超额死亡率峰值出现的时间可能是一个因素,但它并不是造成总死亡人数的主要原因。这项研究强调了制定全面公共卫生战略的迫切需要,这些战略的重点是加强医疗保健基础设施和降低原有的健康风险,这对有效防范和应对大流行病至关重要。这些研究结果表明,有必要重新评估当前的方法,并探索管理未来突发卫生事件的替代战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
55
期刊介绍: Now accepted in JSTOR! Population Research and Policy Review has a twofold goal: it provides a convenient source for government officials and scholars in which they can learn about the policy implications of recent research relevant to the causes and consequences of changing population size and composition; and it provides a broad, interdisciplinary coverage of population research. Population Research and Policy Review seeks to publish quality material of interest to professionals working in the fields of population, and those fields which intersect and overlap with population studies. The publication includes demographic, economic, social, political and health research papers and related contributions which are based on either the direct scientific evaluation of particular policies or programs, or general contributions intended to advance knowledge that informs policy and program development.
期刊最新文献
Realization of Short-Term Fertility Intentions in a Comparative Perspective: Which Macro-Level Conditions Matter? Perceived Spousal Concordance on Desired Family Size and Birth Intendedness Among Second and Higher-Order Births in Pakistan Health Care Access Among Children in Latinx Families Across U.S. Destinations State-Level LGBTQ + Policies and Experiences of Interpersonal Discrimination among Sexual and Gender Minority People Infant Mortality in Mother and Baby Homes in 20th Century Ireland
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1