Salient discourses in international society: When and how have United Nations global conferences acted as catalysts?

IF 2.3 3区 社会学 Q1 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Journal of International Relations and Development Pub Date : 2024-04-27 DOI:10.1057/s41268-024-00324-7
Catherine Hecht, Jens Steffek
{"title":"Salient discourses in international society: When and how have United Nations global conferences acted as catalysts?","authors":"Catherine Hecht, Jens Steffek","doi":"10.1057/s41268-024-00324-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Salient discourses shape the way actors perceive and engage in global politics. How and to what extent terminology becomes salient in international society, however, is not well understood. This article investigates one potential source of discursive change: global conferences convened by the United Nations (UN). Conceptually, we combine insights from scholarship on discursive shifts with an emphasis on how salient terms become in a given venue and points in time, in order to better understand when and to what extent a discursive shift is sustained. Quantitative analysis of all speeches in the UN General Assembly (UNGA) General Debate between 1970 and 2020 robustly illustrates correspondence between UN global conferences and shifts in the salience of core terms by means of two independent indicators and interrupted time series analysis. We identify three significant discursive shifts following UN global conferences with wide and puzzling variation in their trajectories: sustainable development, social development, and gender (equality). To understand this variation, we qualitatively investigate scope conditions of discursive shifts and salience of these and several related terms. Our findings include that differences in terms’ versatility and formal institutionalisation correspond with their rise and fall in salience after global conferences.</p>","PeriodicalId":46698,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Relations and Development","volume":"238 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Relations and Development","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1057/s41268-024-00324-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Salient discourses shape the way actors perceive and engage in global politics. How and to what extent terminology becomes salient in international society, however, is not well understood. This article investigates one potential source of discursive change: global conferences convened by the United Nations (UN). Conceptually, we combine insights from scholarship on discursive shifts with an emphasis on how salient terms become in a given venue and points in time, in order to better understand when and to what extent a discursive shift is sustained. Quantitative analysis of all speeches in the UN General Assembly (UNGA) General Debate between 1970 and 2020 robustly illustrates correspondence between UN global conferences and shifts in the salience of core terms by means of two independent indicators and interrupted time series analysis. We identify three significant discursive shifts following UN global conferences with wide and puzzling variation in their trajectories: sustainable development, social development, and gender (equality). To understand this variation, we qualitatively investigate scope conditions of discursive shifts and salience of these and several related terms. Our findings include that differences in terms’ versatility and formal institutionalisation correspond with their rise and fall in salience after global conferences.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
国际社会的重要论述:联合国全球会议何时以及如何发挥了催化剂的作用?
突出的论述决定了行动者看待和参与全球政治的方式。然而,人们对术语如何以及在多大程度上成为国际社会中的突出术语还不甚了解。本文研究了话语变化的一个潜在来源:联合国(UN)召开的全球会议。从概念上讲,我们结合了有关话语转变的学术见解,强调了术语在特定场所和时间点上的显著性,以便更好地理解话语转变何时以及在多大程度上得以持续。通过对 1970 年至 2020 年联合国大会(UNGA)一般性辩论的所有发言进行定量分析,利用两个独立指标和间断时间序列分析,有力地说明了联合国全球会议与核心术语显著性变化之间的对应关系。我们确定了联合国全球会议后三个重要的话语转变,其轨迹差异巨大,令人费解:可持续发展、社会发展和性别(平等)。为了理解这种差异,我们对话语转变的范围条件以及这些术语和一些相关术语的显著性进行了定性研究。我们的研究结果包括:术语的通用性和正式制度化的差异与它们在全球会议后显著性的上升和下降相对应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.90%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: JIRD is an independent and internationally peer-reviewed journal in international relations and international political economy. It publishes articles on contemporary world politics and the global political economy from a variety of methodologies and approaches. The journal, whose history goes back to 1984, has been established to encourage scholarly publications by authors coming from Central/Eastern Europe. Open to all scholars since its refoundation in the late 1990s, yet keeping this initial aim, it applied a rigorous peer-review system and became the official journal of the Central and East European International Studies Association (CEEISA). JIRD seeks original manuscripts that provide theoretically informed empirical analyses of issues in international relations and international political economy, as well as original theoretical or conceptual analyses.
期刊最新文献
Placing machine learning into the hermeneutic circle: a combined computational-interpretive method for text analysis Translating global norms on crime to schools: analysing textbook lessons on the trafficking of humans in the United States, Nigeria and Germany Strangers from the middle of nowhere? Manaf Halbouni’s Monument and the politics of proximity When structural factors that cause interethnic violence work in favour of peace: The story of Baljvine, a warless Bosnian-Herzegovinian peace mosaic Forum-shifting from above and below: international stratification and the fragmentation of the nuclear non-proliferation regime complex
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1