Chen Chi , Juqin Shen , Xin Gao , Pei Hu , Ping Yi
{"title":"Horizontal ecological compensation standards based on ecosystem services flow","authors":"Chen Chi , Juqin Shen , Xin Gao , Pei Hu , Ping Yi","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The determination of compensation standards is the core of horizontal ecological compensation (HEC). However, existing studies focused on the ecological value stocks of ecosystem services (ESs) within an administrative area but ignored their spatial mobility when determining standards, so the HEC policies had difficulty in achieving the desired goals. This study takes the upper-middle reaches of the Yangtze River as the study area, adopts the gravity model to calculate the ecosystem services flow (ESF) in the eight provinces of the area, and formulates a HEC standard accounting model to determine the compensation standards. The results show that there are inhomogeneous distributions of ESs supply and demand from 2005 to 2020. The ESs supply tends to decline, then increase, whereas the demand continuously increases. The total ESF volume from the ESs-providing areas (ESPAs) to the ESs-benefiting areas (ESBAs) first increases and then decreases. In 2020, Tibet, Qinghai, Chongqing, and Hunan are the ESPAs, with Qinghai obtaining the highest compensation standard of 308.56 million CNY and accounting for more than 50% of the total. The ESBAs include Sichuan, Yunnan, Hubei, and Jiangxi, among which Sichuan is the main source of HEC funds with payments of 375.79 million CNY. This study can provide theoretical references for improving HEC rationality, as well as resolving the contradictions between environmental protection costs and benefits externalities for large-scale regions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11459,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Indicators","volume":"163 ","pages":"Article 112081"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X24005387/pdfft?md5=98bbacfe9e2cc59780f1d8e9c9014b62&pid=1-s2.0-S1470160X24005387-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X24005387","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The determination of compensation standards is the core of horizontal ecological compensation (HEC). However, existing studies focused on the ecological value stocks of ecosystem services (ESs) within an administrative area but ignored their spatial mobility when determining standards, so the HEC policies had difficulty in achieving the desired goals. This study takes the upper-middle reaches of the Yangtze River as the study area, adopts the gravity model to calculate the ecosystem services flow (ESF) in the eight provinces of the area, and formulates a HEC standard accounting model to determine the compensation standards. The results show that there are inhomogeneous distributions of ESs supply and demand from 2005 to 2020. The ESs supply tends to decline, then increase, whereas the demand continuously increases. The total ESF volume from the ESs-providing areas (ESPAs) to the ESs-benefiting areas (ESBAs) first increases and then decreases. In 2020, Tibet, Qinghai, Chongqing, and Hunan are the ESPAs, with Qinghai obtaining the highest compensation standard of 308.56 million CNY and accounting for more than 50% of the total. The ESBAs include Sichuan, Yunnan, Hubei, and Jiangxi, among which Sichuan is the main source of HEC funds with payments of 375.79 million CNY. This study can provide theoretical references for improving HEC rationality, as well as resolving the contradictions between environmental protection costs and benefits externalities for large-scale regions.
期刊介绍:
The ultimate aim of Ecological Indicators is to integrate the monitoring and assessment of ecological and environmental indicators with management practices. The journal provides a forum for the discussion of the applied scientific development and review of traditional indicator approaches as well as for theoretical, modelling and quantitative applications such as index development. Research into the following areas will be published.
• All aspects of ecological and environmental indicators and indices.
• New indicators, and new approaches and methods for indicator development, testing and use.
• Development and modelling of indices, e.g. application of indicator suites across multiple scales and resources.
• Analysis and research of resource, system- and scale-specific indicators.
• Methods for integration of social and other valuation metrics for the production of scientifically rigorous and politically-relevant assessments using indicator-based monitoring and assessment programs.
• How research indicators can be transformed into direct application for management purposes.
• Broader assessment objectives and methods, e.g. biodiversity, biological integrity, and sustainability, through the use of indicators.
• Resource-specific indicators such as landscape, agroecosystems, forests, wetlands, etc.