On the Robustness of Black Americans’ Support for the Police: Evidence From a National Experiment

IF 3.3 1区 社会学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY Journal of Criminal Justice Pub Date : 2024-04-27 DOI:10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2024.102186
Linda Balcarová , Justin T. Pickett , Amanda Graham , Sean Patrick Roche , Francis T. Cullen
{"title":"On the Robustness of Black Americans’ Support for the Police: Evidence From a National Experiment","authors":"Linda Balcarová ,&nbsp;Justin T. Pickett ,&nbsp;Amanda Graham ,&nbsp;Sean Patrick Roche ,&nbsp;Francis T. Cullen","doi":"10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2024.102186","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Recent polls reveal a complex picture of policing attitudes in Black America. Although most Black Americans are afraid of the police, most also prefer to maintain (or increase) local police presence and spending. Are these paradoxical policy preferences artifacts of the questions used in Gallup and Pew polls—questions that fail to disentangle assumptions about trends in crime and police reform? We tested this experimentally using a nationwide survey (N = 1,100) with comparable numbers of Black (N = 511) and non-Black (N = 589) respondents. We found that Black Americans’ policing preferences were robust—if anything, they were more robust than those of non-Black Americans. Most Black Americans said that even if crime was declining and new police reforms were not enacted, they would still prefer to maintain (or increase) police patrols and spending. Both fear of police and perceived procedural justice predicted policy preferences, regardless of respondents’ race.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48272,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Criminal Justice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Criminal Justice","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047235224000357","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent polls reveal a complex picture of policing attitudes in Black America. Although most Black Americans are afraid of the police, most also prefer to maintain (or increase) local police presence and spending. Are these paradoxical policy preferences artifacts of the questions used in Gallup and Pew polls—questions that fail to disentangle assumptions about trends in crime and police reform? We tested this experimentally using a nationwide survey (N = 1,100) with comparable numbers of Black (N = 511) and non-Black (N = 589) respondents. We found that Black Americans’ policing preferences were robust—if anything, they were more robust than those of non-Black Americans. Most Black Americans said that even if crime was declining and new police reforms were not enacted, they would still prefer to maintain (or increase) police patrols and spending. Both fear of police and perceived procedural justice predicted policy preferences, regardless of respondents’ race.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
论美国黑人支持警察的稳健性:来自全国性实验的证据
最近的民意调查显示,美国黑人对维持治安的态度十分复杂。虽然大多数美国黑人害怕警察,但大多数人也倾向于保持(或增加)当地警力和开支。这些自相矛盾的政策偏好是否是盖洛普和皮尤民意调查所使用问题的产物--这些问题未能将有关犯罪趋势和警察改革的假设区分开来?我们通过一项全国范围的调查(N = 1,100),在黑人(N = 511)和非黑人(N = 589)受访者人数相当的情况下,对这一问题进行了实验性测试。我们发现,美国黑人在治安方面的偏好非常强烈,甚至比非美国黑人的偏好更加强烈。大多数美国黑人表示,即使犯罪率在下降,新的警务改革没有颁布,他们仍然倾向于维持(或增加)警察巡逻和开支。无论受访者的种族如何,对警察的恐惧和对程序正义的感知都预示着政策倾向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Criminal Justice
Journal of Criminal Justice CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
93
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Criminal Justice is an international journal intended to fill the present need for the dissemination of new information, ideas and methods, to both practitioners and academicians in the criminal justice area. The Journal is concerned with all aspects of the criminal justice system in terms of their relationships to each other. Although materials are presented relating to crime and the individual elements of the criminal justice system, the emphasis of the Journal is to tie together the functioning of these elements and to illustrate the effects of their interactions. Articles that reflect the application of new disciplines or analytical methodologies to the problems of criminal justice are of special interest. Since the purpose of the Journal is to provide a forum for the dissemination of new ideas, new information, and the application of new methods to the problems and functions of the criminal justice system, the Journal emphasizes innovation and creative thought of the highest quality.
期刊最新文献
A new college campus and crime: Focusing on crime opportunity and gentrification in downtown Orlando, Florida 1200 paths and counting: A script analysis of firearms trafficking in the Province of Quebec, Canada To tent and protect: Homeless encampments as “protective facilities” Classifying perpetrators of stalking-related behavior with latent class analysis When failure is the option: Unravelling sexual assault outcomes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1