Interpersonal physiological and psychological synchrony predict the social transmission of nocebo hyperalgesia between individuals

Rodela Mostafa, Nicolas Andrew McNair, Winston Tan, Cosette Saunders, Ben Colagiuri, Kirsten Barnes
{"title":"Interpersonal physiological and psychological synchrony predict the social transmission of nocebo hyperalgesia between individuals","authors":"Rodela Mostafa, Nicolas Andrew McNair, Winston Tan, Cosette Saunders, Ben Colagiuri, Kirsten Barnes","doi":"10.1038/s44271-024-00069-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Witnessing another’s pain can heighten pain in the observer. However, research has focused on the observer’s intrapersonal experience. Here, a social transmission-chain explored the spread of socially-acquired nocebo hyperalgesia. Dyads of genuine participants were randomised to ‘Generations’ (G1–G3). G1-Demonstrators, observed by G2-Observers, experienced high/low thermal pain contingent on supposed activity/inactivity of a sham-treatment. G2 became Demonstrators, witnessed by G3-Observers. They experienced fixed low-temperature stimuli irrespective of sham-treatment ‘activity’. G3 then Demonstrated for G4-Observers (a confederate), also experiencing low-temperature stimuli only. Pain ratings, electrodermal activity, and facial action units were measured. G1’s treatment-related pain propagated throughout the chain. G2 and G3 participants showed heightened subjective and physiological response to sham-treatment, despite equivalent stimulus temperatures, and G3 never witnessing the initial pain-event. Dyadic interpersonal physiological synchrony (electrodermal activity) and psychological synchrony (Observer’s ability to predict the Demonstrator’s pain), predicted subsequent socially-acquired pain. Implications relate to the interpersonal spread of maladaptive pain experiences. Nocebo hyperalgesia can be socially transmitted through a chain of observers. Differences in interpersonal physiological and psychological synchrony predicted subsequent socially-acquired pain.","PeriodicalId":501698,"journal":{"name":"Communications Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s44271-024-00069-6.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communications Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s44271-024-00069-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Witnessing another’s pain can heighten pain in the observer. However, research has focused on the observer’s intrapersonal experience. Here, a social transmission-chain explored the spread of socially-acquired nocebo hyperalgesia. Dyads of genuine participants were randomised to ‘Generations’ (G1–G3). G1-Demonstrators, observed by G2-Observers, experienced high/low thermal pain contingent on supposed activity/inactivity of a sham-treatment. G2 became Demonstrators, witnessed by G3-Observers. They experienced fixed low-temperature stimuli irrespective of sham-treatment ‘activity’. G3 then Demonstrated for G4-Observers (a confederate), also experiencing low-temperature stimuli only. Pain ratings, electrodermal activity, and facial action units were measured. G1’s treatment-related pain propagated throughout the chain. G2 and G3 participants showed heightened subjective and physiological response to sham-treatment, despite equivalent stimulus temperatures, and G3 never witnessing the initial pain-event. Dyadic interpersonal physiological synchrony (electrodermal activity) and psychological synchrony (Observer’s ability to predict the Demonstrator’s pain), predicted subsequent socially-acquired pain. Implications relate to the interpersonal spread of maladaptive pain experiences. Nocebo hyperalgesia can be socially transmitted through a chain of observers. Differences in interpersonal physiological and psychological synchrony predicted subsequent socially-acquired pain.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人际间的生理和心理同步性可预测个体间恶性超痛感的社会传播
目睹他人的痛苦会加剧观察者的痛苦。然而,研究主要集中在观察者的个人体验上。在这里,我们通过社会传播链来探索社会获得的 "预兆痛觉 "的传播。由真实参与者组成的二人组被随机分配到 "世代"(G1-G3)中。G1-演示者在 G2-观察者的观察下,根据假治疗的假定活动/活动性体验高/低热痛。G2 成为示范者,由 G3 观察者见证。他们体验到固定的低温刺激,与假治疗的 "活动 "无关。然后,G3 为 G4 观察者(一名同伴)演示,同样只体验低温刺激。对疼痛评分、皮肤电活动和面部动作单位进行了测量。G1 的治疗相关疼痛在整个链条中传播。G2 和 G3 参与者对假治疗表现出更强烈的主观和生理反应,尽管刺激温度相当,而且 G3 从未目睹最初的疼痛事件。人际间的生理同步性(皮肤电活动)和心理同步性(观察者预测示范者疼痛的能力)可预测随后的社交性疼痛。这对适应不良疼痛体验的人际传播具有重要意义。过度痛觉可以通过一连串的观察者在社会上传播。人际间生理和心理同步性的差异可预测随后的社交性疼痛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A dissociation between the use of implicit and explicit priors in perceptual inference. Adaptive empathic response selection is sensitive to multiple dimensions of social interaction. Parent-child relationship quality predicts higher subjective well-being in adulthood across a diverse group of countries Sensory stimulation enhances visual working memory capacity Psychoacoustic and Archeoacoustic nature of ancient Aztec skull whistles
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1