{"title":"Customer attributions for LGBT-friendly branding hotels and skepticism","authors":"Heejung Ro, Juhee Kang","doi":"10.1108/ijchm-06-2023-0916","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>This paper aims to examine the relationships between motives, skepticism and brands evaluations in the LGBT-friendly branding hotels context.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>An online survey is created and 278 LGBT participants are recruited through a consumer panels firm. The research model is tested through structural equation modeling.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>Values-, stakeholder- and strategic-driven motives are negatively related to skepticism, while egoistic-driven motive is positively related to skepticism. Also, sexual orientation openness moderates the relationship between stakeholder-driven motives and skepticism. Finally, skepticism is negatively related to brands evaluations.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\n<p>The research findings are limited to the LGBT-friendly hotels. However, this research contributes to the CSR and LGBT consumer research by examining the relationships between the four motives and skepticism considering LGBT customers’ sexual orientation openness level.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\n<p>Hotels should devote greater efforts to communicating that their LGBT-friendly branding efforts are genuine by acknowledging both the social benefits and the business interests.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Social implications</h3>\n<p>As more and more hotels promote themselves as LGBT-friendly brands, a key challenge is reducing skepticism by appropriately conveying their motives. This research sheds light on this critical issue.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>Although existent research on LGBT-friendliness has established its importance; there is a lack of understanding as to how customers perceive LGBT-friendly branding hotels. This research examines the four motives of hotels presenting themselves as being LGBT-friendly and their relationships to skepticism.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":13744,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management","volume":"42 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijchm-06-2023-0916","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose
This paper aims to examine the relationships between motives, skepticism and brands evaluations in the LGBT-friendly branding hotels context.
Design/methodology/approach
An online survey is created and 278 LGBT participants are recruited through a consumer panels firm. The research model is tested through structural equation modeling.
Findings
Values-, stakeholder- and strategic-driven motives are negatively related to skepticism, while egoistic-driven motive is positively related to skepticism. Also, sexual orientation openness moderates the relationship between stakeholder-driven motives and skepticism. Finally, skepticism is negatively related to brands evaluations.
Research limitations/implications
The research findings are limited to the LGBT-friendly hotels. However, this research contributes to the CSR and LGBT consumer research by examining the relationships between the four motives and skepticism considering LGBT customers’ sexual orientation openness level.
Practical implications
Hotels should devote greater efforts to communicating that their LGBT-friendly branding efforts are genuine by acknowledging both the social benefits and the business interests.
Social implications
As more and more hotels promote themselves as LGBT-friendly brands, a key challenge is reducing skepticism by appropriately conveying their motives. This research sheds light on this critical issue.
Originality/value
Although existent research on LGBT-friendliness has established its importance; there is a lack of understanding as to how customers perceive LGBT-friendly branding hotels. This research examines the four motives of hotels presenting themselves as being LGBT-friendly and their relationships to skepticism.
本文旨在研究在 LGBT 友好型品牌酒店背景下,动机、怀疑态度和品牌评价之间的关系。设计/方法/途径通过一家消费者调查公司制作了一份在线调查,并招募了 278 名 LGBT 参与者。研究结果价值观、利益相关者和战略驱动动机与怀疑态度呈负相关,而利己主义驱动动机与怀疑态度呈正相关。此外,性取向开放性也会调节利益相关者驱动动机与怀疑主义之间的关系。最后,怀疑态度与品牌评价负相关。研究局限/影响研究结果仅限于对女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋和变性者友好的酒店。社会影响随着越来越多的酒店宣传自己是 LGBT 友好品牌,一个关键的挑战是通过适当传达其动机来减少怀疑。本研究揭示了这一关键问题。原创性/价值虽然现有的关于 LGBT 友好性的研究已经确定了其重要性,但对于顾客如何看待 LGBT 友好型品牌酒店还缺乏了解。本研究探讨了酒店标榜自己是 LGBT 友好型酒店的四种动机及其与怀疑态度之间的关系。
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management serves as a conduit for disseminating the latest developments and innovative insights into the management of hospitality and tourism businesses globally. The journal publishes peer-reviewed papers that comprehensively address issues pertinent to strategic management, operations, marketing, finance, and HR management in the field of hospitality and tourism.