Child Victims and the Punishment of UN Peacekeepers for Sexual Exploitation and Abuse

IF 2.4 1区 社会学 Q1 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS International Studies Quarterly Pub Date : 2024-04-27 DOI:10.1093/isq/sqae063
Audrey L Comstock
{"title":"Child Victims and the Punishment of UN Peacekeepers for Sexual Exploitation and Abuse","authors":"Audrey L Comstock","doi":"10.1093/isq/sqae063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"s A growing subset of peacekeeping literature focuses on explaining peacekeeper sexual exploitation and abuse (SEA) of civilians within postconflict protection. However, what happens after the abuse has received limited attention. Most of the time, peacekeepers do not receive any type of punishment following abuse allegations. What explains why peacekeepers are punished for abuse allegations? I argue that the presence of child victims increases the chances that peacekeepers are punished. Two mechanisms are highlighted through which the presence of child victims increases the chance of punishment: (i) the increased moral and legal obligation of UN member states to protect children and (ii) the increased shaming and media focus on child victims, which heightens public focus. The empirical analyses of UN and Troop-Contributing Country punishment actions between 2007 and 2017 provide robust support for the argument that the presence of child victims increases peacekeeper punishment. This research builds on studies of SEA, peacekeeping dynamics, and victimhood.","PeriodicalId":48313,"journal":{"name":"International Studies Quarterly","volume":"71 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Studies Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqae063","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

s A growing subset of peacekeeping literature focuses on explaining peacekeeper sexual exploitation and abuse (SEA) of civilians within postconflict protection. However, what happens after the abuse has received limited attention. Most of the time, peacekeepers do not receive any type of punishment following abuse allegations. What explains why peacekeepers are punished for abuse allegations? I argue that the presence of child victims increases the chances that peacekeepers are punished. Two mechanisms are highlighted through which the presence of child victims increases the chance of punishment: (i) the increased moral and legal obligation of UN member states to protect children and (ii) the increased shaming and media focus on child victims, which heightens public focus. The empirical analyses of UN and Troop-Contributing Country punishment actions between 2007 and 2017 provide robust support for the argument that the presence of child victims increases peacekeeper punishment. This research builds on studies of SEA, peacekeeping dynamics, and victimhood.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
儿童受害者与惩治性剥削和性虐待的联合国维和人员
s 越来越多的维和文献侧重于解释维和人员在冲突后保护工作中对平民的性剥削和性虐待(SEA)。然而,虐待发生后的情况受到的关注有限。大多数情况下,维和人员在受到虐待指控后不会受到任何形式的惩罚。是什么原因导致维和人员因虐待指控而受到惩罚?我认为,儿童受害者的存在增加了维和人员受到惩罚的机会。我强调了儿童受害者的存在会增加惩罚机会的两个机制:(i) 联合国会员国保护儿童的道德和法律义务增加;(ii) 对儿童受害者的羞辱和媒体关注增加,从而提高了公众的关注度。对 2007 年至 2017 年期间联合国和部队派遣国惩罚行动的实证分析为儿童受害者的存在会增加维和人员惩罚的论点提供了有力支持。这项研究建立在对海难、维和动态和受害者身份的研究基础之上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
71
期刊介绍: International Studies Quarterly, the official journal of the International Studies Association, seeks to acquaint a broad audience of readers with the best work being done in the variety of intellectual traditions included under the rubric of international studies. Therefore, the editors welcome all submissions addressing this community"s theoretical, empirical, and normative concerns. First preference will continue to be given to articles that address and contribute to important disciplinary and interdisciplinary questions and controversies.
期刊最新文献
Inference with Extremes: Accounting for Extreme Values in Count Regression Models Contesting the Securitization of Migration: NGOs, IGOs, and the Security Backlash Dealing with Clashes of International Law: A Microlevel Study of Climate and Trade Nationalism, Internationalism, and Interventionism: How Overseas Military Service Influences Foreign Policy Attitudes Preferential Trade Agreements and Leaders’ Business Experience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1