Assessing forest cover changes and fragmentation in the Himalayan temperate region: implications for forest conservation and management

IF 3.4 2区 农林科学 Q1 FORESTRY Journal of Forestry Research Pub Date : 2024-04-27 DOI:10.1007/s11676-024-01734-6
Kaleem Mehmood, Shoaib Ahmad Anees, Akhtar Rehman, Aqil Tariq, Qijing Liu, Sultan Muhammad, Fazli Rabbi, Shao’an Pan, Wesam Atef Hatamleh
{"title":"Assessing forest cover changes and fragmentation in the Himalayan temperate region: implications for forest conservation and management","authors":"Kaleem Mehmood, Shoaib Ahmad Anees, Akhtar Rehman, Aqil Tariq, Qijing Liu, Sultan Muhammad, Fazli Rabbi, Shao’an Pan, Wesam Atef Hatamleh","doi":"10.1007/s11676-024-01734-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study comprehensively assessed long-term vegetation changes and forest fragmentation dynamics in the Himalayan temperate region of Pakistan from 1989 to 2019. Four satellite images, including Landsat-5 TM and Landsat-8 Operational Land Imager (OLI), were chosen for subsequent assessments in October 1989, 2001, 2011 and 2019. The classified maps of 1989, 2001, 2011 and 2019 were created using the maximum likelihood classifier. Post-classification comparison showed an overall accuracy of 82.5% and a Kappa coefficient of 0.79 for the 2019 map. Results revealed a drastic decrease in closed-canopy and open-canopy forests by 117.4 and 271.6 km<sup>2</sup>, respectively, and an increase in agriculture/farm cultivation by 1512.8 km<sup>2</sup>. The two-way ANOVA test showed statistically significant differences in the area of various cover classes. Forest fragmentation was evaluated using the Landscape Fragmentation Tool (LFT v2.0) between 1989 and 2019. The large forest core (&gt; 2.00 km<sup>2</sup>) decreased from 149.4 to 296.7 km<sup>2</sup>, and a similar pattern was observed in medium forest core (1.00–2.00 km<sup>2</sup>) forests. On the contrary, the small core (&lt; 1.00 km<sup>2</sup>) forest increased from 124.8 to 145.3 km<sup>2</sup> in 2019. The perforation area increased by 296.9 km<sup>2</sup>, and the edge effect decreased from 458.9 to 431.7 km<sup>2</sup>. The frequency of patches also increased by 119.1 km<sup>2</sup>. The closed and open canopy classes showed a decreasing trend with an annual rate of 0.58% and 1.35%, respectively. The broad implications of these findings can be seen in the studied region as well as other global ecological areas. They serve as an imperative baseline for afforestation and reforestation operations, highlighting the urgent need for efficient management, conservation, and restoration efforts. Based on these findings, sustainable land-use policies may be put into place that support local livelihoods, protect ecosystem services, and conserve biodiversity.</p>","PeriodicalId":15830,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Forestry Research","volume":"1999 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Forestry Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-024-01734-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study comprehensively assessed long-term vegetation changes and forest fragmentation dynamics in the Himalayan temperate region of Pakistan from 1989 to 2019. Four satellite images, including Landsat-5 TM and Landsat-8 Operational Land Imager (OLI), were chosen for subsequent assessments in October 1989, 2001, 2011 and 2019. The classified maps of 1989, 2001, 2011 and 2019 were created using the maximum likelihood classifier. Post-classification comparison showed an overall accuracy of 82.5% and a Kappa coefficient of 0.79 for the 2019 map. Results revealed a drastic decrease in closed-canopy and open-canopy forests by 117.4 and 271.6 km2, respectively, and an increase in agriculture/farm cultivation by 1512.8 km2. The two-way ANOVA test showed statistically significant differences in the area of various cover classes. Forest fragmentation was evaluated using the Landscape Fragmentation Tool (LFT v2.0) between 1989 and 2019. The large forest core (> 2.00 km2) decreased from 149.4 to 296.7 km2, and a similar pattern was observed in medium forest core (1.00–2.00 km2) forests. On the contrary, the small core (< 1.00 km2) forest increased from 124.8 to 145.3 km2 in 2019. The perforation area increased by 296.9 km2, and the edge effect decreased from 458.9 to 431.7 km2. The frequency of patches also increased by 119.1 km2. The closed and open canopy classes showed a decreasing trend with an annual rate of 0.58% and 1.35%, respectively. The broad implications of these findings can be seen in the studied region as well as other global ecological areas. They serve as an imperative baseline for afforestation and reforestation operations, highlighting the urgent need for efficient management, conservation, and restoration efforts. Based on these findings, sustainable land-use policies may be put into place that support local livelihoods, protect ecosystem services, and conserve biodiversity.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估喜马拉雅温带地区的森林覆盖变化和破碎化:对森林保护和管理的影响
本研究全面评估了巴基斯坦喜马拉雅温带地区从1989年到2019年的长期植被变化和森林破碎化动态。随后的评估选取了 1989 年 10 月、2001 年 10 月、2011 年 10 月和 2019 年 10 月的四幅卫星图像,包括 Landsat-5 TM 和 Landsat-8 Operational Land Imager (OLI)。1989 年、2001 年、2011 年和 2019 年的分类地图是使用最大似然分类器绘制的。分类后比较显示,2019 年地图的总体准确率为 82.5%,Kappa 系数为 0.79。结果显示,闭冠林和疏冠林面积分别锐减了 117.4 平方公里和 271.6 平方公里,农业/农耕面积增加了 1512.8 平方公里。双向方差分析测试表明,不同植被等级的面积在统计上存在显著差异。使用景观破碎化工具(LFT v2.0)对 1989 年至 2019 年期间的森林破碎化情况进行了评估。大森林核心(> 2.00平方公里)从149.4平方公里减少到296.7平方公里,中森林核心(1.00-2.00平方公里)森林也出现了类似的情况。相反,2019 年,小核心(< 1.00 平方公里)森林从 124.8 平方公里增加到 145.3 平方公里。穿孔面积增加了 296.9 平方公里,边缘效应从 458.9 平方公里减少到 431.7 平方公里。斑块频率也增加了 119.1 平方公里。封闭冠层和开放冠层呈下降趋势,年下降率分别为 0.58% 和 1.35%。这些发现对研究区域以及全球其他生态区域具有广泛的影响。它们是造林和再造林行动的必要基准,强调了高效管理、保护和恢复工作的迫切需要。基于这些发现,可持续的土地使用政策可以落实到位,以支持当地生计、保护生态系统服务和保护生物多样性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
3.30%
发文量
2538
期刊介绍: The Journal of Forestry Research (JFR), founded in 1990, is a peer-reviewed quarterly journal in English. JFR has rapidly emerged as an international journal published by Northeast Forestry University and Ecological Society of China in collaboration with Springer Verlag. The journal publishes scientific articles related to forestry for a broad range of international scientists, forest managers and practitioners.The scope of the journal covers the following five thematic categories and 20 subjects: Basic Science of Forestry, Forest biometrics, Forest soils, Forest hydrology, Tree physiology, Forest biomass, carbon, and bioenergy, Forest biotechnology and molecular biology, Forest Ecology, Forest ecology, Forest ecological services, Restoration ecology, Forest adaptation to climate change, Wildlife ecology and management, Silviculture and Forest Management, Forest genetics and tree breeding, Silviculture, Forest RS, GIS, and modeling, Forest management, Forest Protection, Forest entomology and pathology, Forest fire, Forest resources conservation, Forest health monitoring and assessment, Wood Science and Technology, Wood Science and Technology.
期刊最新文献
Applying palaeoecological analogues to contemporary challenges: community-level effects of canopy gaps caused by systematic decline of a prevalent tree species A stacking-based model for the spread of Botryosphaeria laricina Leaf functional traits and ecological strategies of common plant species in evergreen broad-leaved forests on Huangshan Mountain Characteristics and expression of heat shock gene Lghsp17.4 in Lenzites gibbosa, a white rot fungus of wood Tree diversity drives understory carbon storage rather than overstory carbon storage across forest types
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1