{"title":"Multi-objective optimization and uncertainty quantification for inductors based on neural network","authors":"Xiaohan Kong, Shuli Yin, Yunyi Gong, Hajime Igarashi","doi":"10.1108/compel-11-2023-0552","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>The prolonged training time of the neural network (NN) has sparked considerable debate regarding their application in the field of optimization. The purpose of this paper is to explore the beneficial assistance of NN-based alternative models in inductance design, with a particular focus on multi-objective optimization and uncertainty analysis processes.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>Under Gaussian-distributed manufacturing errors, this study predicts error intervals for Pareto points and select robust solutions with minimal error margins. Furthermore, this study establishes correlations between manufacturing errors and inductance value discrepancies, offering a practical means of determining permissible manufacturing errors tailored to varying accuracy requirements.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The NN-assisted methods are demonstrated to offer a substantial time advantage in multi-objective optimization compared to conventional approaches, particularly in scenarios where the trained NN is repeatedly used. Also, NN models allow for extensive data-driven uncertainty quantification, which is challenging for traditional methods.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>Three objectives including saturation current are considered in the multi-optimization, and the time advantages of the NN are thoroughly discussed by comparing scenarios involving single optimization, multiple optimizations, bi-objective optimization and tri-objective optimization. This study proposes direct error interval prediction on the Pareto front, using extensive data to predict the response of the Pareto front to random errors following a Gaussian distribution. This approach circumvents the compromises inherent in constrained robust optimization for inductance design and allows for a direct assessment of robustness that can be applied to account for manufacturing errors with complex distributions.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":501376,"journal":{"name":"COMPEL","volume":"44 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"COMPEL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/compel-11-2023-0552","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose
The prolonged training time of the neural network (NN) has sparked considerable debate regarding their application in the field of optimization. The purpose of this paper is to explore the beneficial assistance of NN-based alternative models in inductance design, with a particular focus on multi-objective optimization and uncertainty analysis processes.
Design/methodology/approach
Under Gaussian-distributed manufacturing errors, this study predicts error intervals for Pareto points and select robust solutions with minimal error margins. Furthermore, this study establishes correlations between manufacturing errors and inductance value discrepancies, offering a practical means of determining permissible manufacturing errors tailored to varying accuracy requirements.
Findings
The NN-assisted methods are demonstrated to offer a substantial time advantage in multi-objective optimization compared to conventional approaches, particularly in scenarios where the trained NN is repeatedly used. Also, NN models allow for extensive data-driven uncertainty quantification, which is challenging for traditional methods.
Originality/value
Three objectives including saturation current are considered in the multi-optimization, and the time advantages of the NN are thoroughly discussed by comparing scenarios involving single optimization, multiple optimizations, bi-objective optimization and tri-objective optimization. This study proposes direct error interval prediction on the Pareto front, using extensive data to predict the response of the Pareto front to random errors following a Gaussian distribution. This approach circumvents the compromises inherent in constrained robust optimization for inductance design and allows for a direct assessment of robustness that can be applied to account for manufacturing errors with complex distributions.
目的神经网络(NN)的训练时间较长,这引发了有关其在优化领域应用的大量讨论。本文旨在探索基于 NN 的替代模型在电感设计中的有益帮助,尤其侧重于多目标优化和不确定性分析过程。设计/方法/途径在高斯分布的制造误差条件下,本研究预测了帕雷托点的误差区间,并选择了误差幅度最小的稳健解决方案。此外,本研究还确定了制造误差与电感值差异之间的相关性,为确定适合不同精度要求的允许制造误差提供了实用方法。研究结果与传统方法相比,NN 辅助方法在多目标优化方面具有显著的时间优势,尤其是在反复使用训练有素的 NN 的情况下。原创性/价值在多目标优化中考虑了包括饱和电流在内的三个目标,通过比较单目标优化、多目标优化、双目标优化和三目标优化等方案,深入探讨了 NN 的时间优势。本研究提出了帕累托前沿的直接误差区间预测,利用大量数据预测帕累托前沿对高斯分布随机误差的响应。这种方法规避了电感设计约束稳健优化中固有的折衷方法,并允许对稳健性进行直接评估,该评估可用于考虑具有复杂分布的制造误差。