Roger Chaffin, Cristina Capparelli Gerling, Alexander P. Demos
{"title":"How secure memorization promotes expression: A longitudinal case study of performing Chopin’s Barcarolle, Op. 60","authors":"Roger Chaffin, Cristina Capparelli Gerling, Alexander P. Demos","doi":"10.1177/10298649241241405","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Experienced musicians can perform reliably from memory because they prepare performance cues (PCs) that allow them to recover when performance is disrupted. We describe a longitudinal case study in which a pianist (the second author) learned and performed Chopin’s Barcarolle, Op. 60, over a 12-year period. The pianist provided PC reports for 28 performances, starting a month before her first public performance. Shortly after each performance, she marked the features of the music that guided her playing (PCs) on a clean copy of the score, distinguishing five types of PC: structural, Schenkerian (tonal elaborations), expressive, interpretive, and basic. Structural PCs predominated at first and were later replaced by expressive and Schenkerian PCs. PCs were more frequent at structural boundaries than at other locations. This boundary effect was larger under typical, compared to atypical performance conditions, and increased over time, suggesting that the main function of PCs was promoting expression rather than guarding against mistakes. Although the pianist’s initial purpose in learning to use PCs was to have a safety net in case of memory failure, she was surprised to find that she enjoyed playing with PCs and believed they helped her to play more expressively.","PeriodicalId":47219,"journal":{"name":"Musicae Scientiae","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Musicae Scientiae","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10298649241241405","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MUSIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Experienced musicians can perform reliably from memory because they prepare performance cues (PCs) that allow them to recover when performance is disrupted. We describe a longitudinal case study in which a pianist (the second author) learned and performed Chopin’s Barcarolle, Op. 60, over a 12-year period. The pianist provided PC reports for 28 performances, starting a month before her first public performance. Shortly after each performance, she marked the features of the music that guided her playing (PCs) on a clean copy of the score, distinguishing five types of PC: structural, Schenkerian (tonal elaborations), expressive, interpretive, and basic. Structural PCs predominated at first and were later replaced by expressive and Schenkerian PCs. PCs were more frequent at structural boundaries than at other locations. This boundary effect was larger under typical, compared to atypical performance conditions, and increased over time, suggesting that the main function of PCs was promoting expression rather than guarding against mistakes. Although the pianist’s initial purpose in learning to use PCs was to have a safety net in case of memory failure, she was surprised to find that she enjoyed playing with PCs and believed they helped her to play more expressively.
经验丰富的音乐家可以根据记忆进行可靠的演奏,因为他们准备了演奏线索(PC),当演奏受到干扰时可以恢复记忆。我们描述了一项纵向案例研究,在这项研究中,一位钢琴家(第二作者)在 12 年的时间里学习并演奏了肖邦的《巴卡洛尔舞曲,作品 60》。该钢琴家提供了 28 场演出的 PC 报告,从她第一次公开演出前一个月开始。每次演奏后不久,她都会在一份干净的乐谱副本上标注出指导她演奏的音乐特征(PC),并区分出五种类型的 PC:结构性 PC、申克式 PC(调性阐述)、表现性 PC、诠释性 PC 和基本 PC。结构性 PC 起初占主导地位,后来被表现性 PC 和申克式 PC 所取代。结构性 PC 比其他位置的 PC 更常见。这种边界效应在典型演奏条件下比非典型演奏条件下更大,并随着时间的推移而增加,这表明 PC 的主要功能是促进表达而不是防止错误。虽然这位钢琴家学习使用个人计算机的最初目的是为了在记忆失败时有一个安全网,但她惊讶地发现自己很喜欢使用个人计算机演奏,并认为个人计算机有助于她更有表现力地演奏。