Comparison of lifetime mortality risk, incidence risk, and DALYs of baseline cancer rates among countries as a benchmark for radiation-related cancer risk

IF 1.4 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Journal of Radiological Protection Pub Date : 2024-04-28 DOI:10.1088/1361-6498/ad4043
Jun Hirouchi, Ikuo Kujiraoka, Shogo Takahara, Momo Takada, Thierry Schneider and Michiaki Kai
{"title":"Comparison of lifetime mortality risk, incidence risk, and DALYs of baseline cancer rates among countries as a benchmark for radiation-related cancer risk","authors":"Jun Hirouchi, Ikuo Kujiraoka, Shogo Takahara, Momo Takada, Thierry Schneider and Michiaki Kai","doi":"10.1088/1361-6498/ad4043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Statistical benchmark data are necessary when considering the basis for radiation protection criteria based on calculated risks. We herein focused on baseline mortality and incidence cancer rates as benchmark data collected from 33 countries. Furthermore, we calculated the lifetime mortality and incidence risks and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for all solid cancers, colon cancer, lung cancer, breast cancer, thyroid cancer, and leukemia using the baseline cancer rates and compared them among the countries. The results showed that the lifetime mortality and incidence risks and DALYs for all solid cancers differed among the countries by a factor of 2–4 for males and 2–3 for females; these were low in less-developed countries. Our study proposed that health risk based on baseline cancer rates should be the benchmark for comparing radiation cancer risks.","PeriodicalId":50068,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Radiological Protection","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Radiological Protection","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6498/ad4043","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Statistical benchmark data are necessary when considering the basis for radiation protection criteria based on calculated risks. We herein focused on baseline mortality and incidence cancer rates as benchmark data collected from 33 countries. Furthermore, we calculated the lifetime mortality and incidence risks and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for all solid cancers, colon cancer, lung cancer, breast cancer, thyroid cancer, and leukemia using the baseline cancer rates and compared them among the countries. The results showed that the lifetime mortality and incidence risks and DALYs for all solid cancers differed among the countries by a factor of 2–4 for males and 2–3 for females; these were low in less-developed countries. Our study proposed that health risk based on baseline cancer rates should be the benchmark for comparing radiation cancer risks.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较各国作为辐射相关癌症风险基准的终生死亡风险、发病风险和基准癌症发病率的残疾调整寿命年数
在考虑基于计算风险的辐射防护标准时,统计基准数据是必要的。在此,我们重点关注从 33 个国家收集到的癌症死亡率和发病率基准数据。此外,我们还利用基线癌症发病率计算了所有实体癌、结肠癌、肺癌、乳腺癌、甲状腺癌和白血病的终生死亡率和发病率风险以及残疾调整生命年(DALYs),并在各国之间进行了比较。结果表明,所有实体癌的终生死亡率和发病率风险以及残疾调整寿命年数在不同国家之间存在差异,男性为 2-4 倍,女性为 2-3 倍;欠发达国家的差异较小。我们的研究建议,应将基于基线癌症发病率的健康风险作为比较辐射癌症风险的基准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Radiological Protection
Journal of Radiological Protection 环境科学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
26.70%
发文量
137
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Radiological Protection publishes articles on all aspects of radiological protection, including non-ionising as well as ionising radiations. Fields of interest range from research, development and theory to operational matters, education and training. The very wide spectrum of its topics includes: dosimetry, instrument development, specialized measuring techniques, epidemiology, biological effects (in vivo and in vitro) and risk and environmental impact assessments. The journal encourages publication of data and code as well as results.
期刊最新文献
Assessing radiation exposure of fingers of PET/CTtechnologists during 18F-FDG procedures usingactive extremity dosimeters: A single-center study. Descriptive overview of AI applications in x-ray imaging and radiotherapy. How much resources are reasonable to spend on radiological protection? Distribution of plutonium and radium in the human heart. Doses from ionising radiation in paediatric cardiac catheterisations in Norway 1975-2021.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1