Would you trust an AI team member? Team trust in human–AI teams

IF 4.9 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology Pub Date : 2024-04-27 DOI:10.1111/joop.12504
Eleni Georganta, Anna-Sophie Ulfert
{"title":"Would you trust an AI team member? Team trust in human–AI teams","authors":"Eleni Georganta,&nbsp;Anna-Sophie Ulfert","doi":"10.1111/joop.12504","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Given that AI is becoming an increasingly active participant in work teams, this study explores how team trust emerges in human–AI teams compared to human–human teams. Adopting a multi-level approach, we conducted two experimental studies (<i>N</i><sub>Study1</sub> = 247 two-member teams and <i>N</i><sub>Study2</sub> = 106 three-member teams, 828 individuals overall) and investigated how team composition (with AI or human team members) impacts interpersonal trust (affective and cognitive) and thus team trust. In two-member teams, interpersonal trust via perceived trustworthiness and not via perceived similarity was lower in human–AI teams compared to human–human teams. Exploratory findings showed that team identification and cognitive interpersonal trust were also lower in two-member human–AI teams than in human–human teams. However, in three-member teams, we found no differences in team trust via interpersonal trust between the two team types. Instead, our findings revealed that perceived trustworthiness and perceived similarity increased interpersonal trust and, in turn, team trust for both team types. With this research, we showed that underlying theories and evidence of team trust in human-only teams can enhance understanding of human–AI teams, though the results indicated certain differences that call for further investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":48330,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology","volume":"97 3","pages":"1212-1241"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/joop.12504","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/joop.12504","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Given that AI is becoming an increasingly active participant in work teams, this study explores how team trust emerges in human–AI teams compared to human–human teams. Adopting a multi-level approach, we conducted two experimental studies (NStudy1 = 247 two-member teams and NStudy2 = 106 three-member teams, 828 individuals overall) and investigated how team composition (with AI or human team members) impacts interpersonal trust (affective and cognitive) and thus team trust. In two-member teams, interpersonal trust via perceived trustworthiness and not via perceived similarity was lower in human–AI teams compared to human–human teams. Exploratory findings showed that team identification and cognitive interpersonal trust were also lower in two-member human–AI teams than in human–human teams. However, in three-member teams, we found no differences in team trust via interpersonal trust between the two team types. Instead, our findings revealed that perceived trustworthiness and perceived similarity increased interpersonal trust and, in turn, team trust for both team types. With this research, we showed that underlying theories and evidence of team trust in human-only teams can enhance understanding of human–AI teams, though the results indicated certain differences that call for further investigation.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
您会信任人工智能团队成员吗?人类-人工智能团队中的团队信任
鉴于人工智能正日益成为工作团队中的积极参与者,本研究探讨了人与人工智能团队与人与人团队相比,团队信任是如何产生的。采用多层次方法,我们进行了两项实验研究(NStudy1 = 247 支两人团队和 NStudy2 = 106 支三人团队,总计 828 人),并调查了团队组成(有人工智能或人类团队成员)如何影响人际信任(情感和认知),进而影响团队信任。在双人团队中,与人与人团队相比,人与人工智能团队中通过感知可信度而非通过感知相似度产生的人际信任度较低。探索性研究结果表明,在双人人工智能团队中,团队认同和认知人际信任也低于人-人团队。然而,在三人团队中,我们发现两类团队在团队信任和人际信任方面没有差异。相反,我们的研究结果表明,感知到的可信度和感知到的相似性增加了人际信任,进而增加了两种团队类型的团队信任。通过这项研究,我们表明,纯人类团队中团队信任的基本理论和证据可以加深对人类-人工智能团队的理解,尽管研究结果表明存在某些差异,需要进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
4.80%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: The Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology aims to increase understanding of people and organisations at work including: - industrial, organizational, work, vocational and personnel psychology - behavioural and cognitive aspects of industrial relations - ergonomics and human factors Innovative or interdisciplinary approaches with a psychological emphasis are particularly welcome. So are papers which develop the links between occupational/organisational psychology and other areas of the discipline, such as social and cognitive psychology.
期刊最新文献
Leading with paradox: Promoting self-leadership and positive work behaviours through leader-member exchange Pursuing a future leader self: A multi-study investigation of leader identity and its motivational and behavioural outcomes Learning and adaptation of transformational leaders: Linking transformational leadership to leader self-efficacy for emotional regulation and work engagement A dual cognitive pathway model of leadership influence on creativity Exploring the necessary roles of basic psychological needs at work: A necessary condition analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1