Modality and stimulus effects on distributional statistical learning: Sound vs. sight, time vs. space

IF 2.9 1区 心理学 Q1 LINGUISTICS Journal of memory and language Pub Date : 2024-04-30 DOI:10.1016/j.jml.2024.104531
Haoyu Zhou , Sabine van der Ham , Bart de Boer , Louisa Bogaerts , Limor Raviv
{"title":"Modality and stimulus effects on distributional statistical learning: Sound vs. sight, time vs. space","authors":"Haoyu Zhou ,&nbsp;Sabine van der Ham ,&nbsp;Bart de Boer ,&nbsp;Louisa Bogaerts ,&nbsp;Limor Raviv","doi":"10.1016/j.jml.2024.104531","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Statistical learning (SL) is postulated to play an important role in the process of language acquisition as well as in other cognitive functions. It was found to enable learning of various types of statistical patterns across different sensory modalities. However, few studies have distinguished distributional SL (DSL) from sequential and spatial SL, or examined DSL across modalities using comparable tasks. Considering the relevance of such findings to the nature of SL, the current study investigated the modality- and stimulus-specificity of DSL. Using a within-subject design we compared DSL performance in auditory and visual modalities. For each sensory modality, two stimulus types were used: linguistic versus non-linguistic auditory stimuli and temporal versus spatial visual stimuli. In each condition, participants were exposed to stimuli that varied in their length as they were drawn from two categories (short versus long). DSL was assessed using a categorization task and a production task. Results showed that learners’ performance was only correlated for tasks in the same sensory modality. Moreover, participants were better at categorizing the temporal signals in the auditory conditions than in the visual condition, where in turn an advantage of the spatial condition was observed. In the production task participants exaggerated signal length more for linguistic signals than non-linguistic signals. Together, these findings suggest that DSL is modality- and stimulus-sensitive.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16493,"journal":{"name":"Journal of memory and language","volume":"138 ","pages":"Article 104531"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of memory and language","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749596X24000342","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Statistical learning (SL) is postulated to play an important role in the process of language acquisition as well as in other cognitive functions. It was found to enable learning of various types of statistical patterns across different sensory modalities. However, few studies have distinguished distributional SL (DSL) from sequential and spatial SL, or examined DSL across modalities using comparable tasks. Considering the relevance of such findings to the nature of SL, the current study investigated the modality- and stimulus-specificity of DSL. Using a within-subject design we compared DSL performance in auditory and visual modalities. For each sensory modality, two stimulus types were used: linguistic versus non-linguistic auditory stimuli and temporal versus spatial visual stimuli. In each condition, participants were exposed to stimuli that varied in their length as they were drawn from two categories (short versus long). DSL was assessed using a categorization task and a production task. Results showed that learners’ performance was only correlated for tasks in the same sensory modality. Moreover, participants were better at categorizing the temporal signals in the auditory conditions than in the visual condition, where in turn an advantage of the spatial condition was observed. In the production task participants exaggerated signal length more for linguistic signals than non-linguistic signals. Together, these findings suggest that DSL is modality- and stimulus-sensitive.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
模式和刺激对分布式统计学习的影响:声音与视觉、时间与空间
据推测,统计学习(SL)在语言习得过程和其他认知功能中发挥着重要作用。研究发现,统计学习能够学习不同感官模式下的各种统计模式。然而,很少有研究将分布式语法(DSL)与顺序式和空间式语法区分开来,也很少有研究使用可比较的任务对不同模态的分布式语法进行研究。考虑到这些研究结果与分布式视觉障碍的本质相关,本研究对分布式视觉障碍的模式和刺激特异性进行了调查。我们采用受试内设计,比较了听觉和视觉模式下的 DSL 表现。每种感官模式都使用了两种刺激类型:语言性与非语言性听觉刺激,时间性与空间性视觉刺激。在每种条件下,受试者都会接触到不同长度的刺激,因为这些刺激是从两个类别(短刺激和长刺激)中抽取出来的。DSL 通过分类任务和制作任务进行评估。结果显示,学习者的表现只与同一感官模式下的任务相关。此外,在听觉条件下,学员对时间信号的分类能力优于视觉条件,而在视觉条件下,学员对空间信号的分类能力又优于听觉条件。在制作任务中,与非语言信号相比,语言信号的参与者更夸大信号的长度。这些发现共同表明,DSL 对模式和刺激都很敏感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
14.00%
发文量
49
审稿时长
12.7 weeks
期刊介绍: Articles in the Journal of Memory and Language contribute to the formulation of scientific issues and theories in the areas of memory, language comprehension and production, and cognitive processes. Special emphasis is given to research articles that provide new theoretical insights based on a carefully laid empirical foundation. The journal generally favors articles that provide multiple experiments. In addition, significant theoretical papers without new experimental findings may be published. The Journal of Memory and Language is a valuable tool for cognitive scientists, including psychologists, linguists, and others interested in memory and learning, language, reading, and speech. Research Areas include: • Topics that illuminate aspects of memory or language processing • Linguistics • Neuropsychology.
期刊最新文献
Production increases both true and false recognition Protecting the innocent in eyewitness identification: An analysis of simultaneous and ranking lineups Electrophysiological correlates of incidental L2 word learning from dialogue Using the phenomenology of knowledge-based retrieval failures in younger and older adults to characterize proximity to retrieval success and identify a Zone of Proximal Retrieval Individual differences in time-based prospective memory: The roles of working memory and time monitoring
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1