Losing altitude: The impact of new leasing standards on the liquidity, leverage, profitability and valuation of U.S. and European airlines

IF 3.9 2区 工程技术 Q2 TRANSPORTATION Journal of Air Transport Management Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jairtraman.2024.102594
Philip J. Slater, Alfred Greenfield, Earl Godfrey, Felice Policastro
{"title":"Losing altitude: The impact of new leasing standards on the liquidity, leverage, profitability and valuation of U.S. and European airlines","authors":"Philip J. Slater,&nbsp;Alfred Greenfield,&nbsp;Earl Godfrey,&nbsp;Felice Policastro","doi":"10.1016/j.jairtraman.2024.102594","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The global airline industry represents fertile ground for research due to its susceptibility to extraneous demand shocks such as fuel price hikes, terrorist attacks, and global pandemics coupled with high leverage and high reliance on leasing. Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 842 Leases and International Financial Reporting Standard (IFRS) 16 Leases became effective January 1st, 2019 for publicly-traded firms in the U.S. and overseas, requiring capitalization of the majority of leased assets. This study was motivated by how the acts may have affected reported airline liquidity, leverage, profitability and stock price, and if any evidence existed of lease restructure attempts in order to avoid capitalization; which may provide initial impacts. Using a sample of publicly-traded airlines incorporated in the U.S. and Europe, the current study used firm year-level filings from 2017 to 2019 to determine if passage of the acts were associated with changes in liquidity, leverage, profitability and stock price. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and independent samples t-test parametric statistical testing was employed to determine any statistically significant change in the means of selected ratios operationalizing liquidity, leverage, profitability and firm valuation. The results indicated no significance for any of the variables operationalizing the latent constructs providing evidence contrary to previous predictions, and a significant difference between the two regions, worthy of further study. These findings are significant due to the vast financial reporting implications associated with these acts and their potential to skew financial ratios, juxtaposed against the ever-present threat of extraneous demand shocks which permeate this industry. The research also suggests management may have attempted lease restructures to circumvent the capitalization requirements of the act and warrants further research to investigate the generalizability of these findings to other industries.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":14925,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Air Transport Management","volume":"117 ","pages":"Article 102594"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Air Transport Management","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969699724000590","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The global airline industry represents fertile ground for research due to its susceptibility to extraneous demand shocks such as fuel price hikes, terrorist attacks, and global pandemics coupled with high leverage and high reliance on leasing. Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 842 Leases and International Financial Reporting Standard (IFRS) 16 Leases became effective January 1st, 2019 for publicly-traded firms in the U.S. and overseas, requiring capitalization of the majority of leased assets. This study was motivated by how the acts may have affected reported airline liquidity, leverage, profitability and stock price, and if any evidence existed of lease restructure attempts in order to avoid capitalization; which may provide initial impacts. Using a sample of publicly-traded airlines incorporated in the U.S. and Europe, the current study used firm year-level filings from 2017 to 2019 to determine if passage of the acts were associated with changes in liquidity, leverage, profitability and stock price. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and independent samples t-test parametric statistical testing was employed to determine any statistically significant change in the means of selected ratios operationalizing liquidity, leverage, profitability and firm valuation. The results indicated no significance for any of the variables operationalizing the latent constructs providing evidence contrary to previous predictions, and a significant difference between the two regions, worthy of further study. These findings are significant due to the vast financial reporting implications associated with these acts and their potential to skew financial ratios, juxtaposed against the ever-present threat of extraneous demand shocks which permeate this industry. The research also suggests management may have attempted lease restructures to circumvent the capitalization requirements of the act and warrants further research to investigate the generalizability of these findings to other industries.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
失去高度:新租赁标准对美国和欧洲航空公司流动性、杠杆率、盈利能力和估值的影响
全球航空业是研究的沃土,因为它容易受到燃料价格上涨、恐怖袭击和全球大流行病等外部需求冲击的影响,同时还具有高杠杆率和高度依赖租赁的特点。会计准则汇编》(ASC)842 租赁和《国际财务报告准则》(IFRS)16 租赁于 2019 年 1 月 1 日对美国和海外上市公司生效,要求将大部分租赁资产资本化。本研究的动机是,该法案可能会如何影响航空公司报告的流动性、杠杆率、盈利能力和股票价格,以及是否存在为避免资本化而试图进行租赁重组的证据;这可能会产生初步影响。本研究以在美国和欧洲上市的航空公司为样本,使用 2017 年至 2019 年的公司年度级申报文件,以确定法案的通过是否与流动性、杠杆率、盈利能力和股票价格的变化有关。研究采用了单因子方差分析(ANOVA)和独立样本t检验等参数统计检验方法,以确定所选的流动性、杠杆率、盈利能力和公司估值操作比率的均值是否发生了统计学意义上的显著变化。结果表明,任何操作潜在结构的变量都没有显著性,这与之前的预测相反,而且两个地区之间存在显著差异,值得进一步研究。这些研究结果具有重要意义,因为与这些行为相关的财务报告影响巨大,而且有可能扭曲财务比率,与此同时,外来需求冲击的威胁无处不在,而这一行业又无时无刻不受到外来需求冲击的影响。研究还表明,管理层可能试图通过租赁重组来规避该法案的资本化要求,因此有必要进一步研究这些发现对其他行业的普遍适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.40
自引率
11.70%
发文量
97
期刊介绍: The Journal of Air Transport Management (JATM) sets out to address, through high quality research articles and authoritative commentary, the major economic, management and policy issues facing the air transport industry today. It offers practitioners and academics an international and dynamic forum for analysis and discussion of these issues, linking research and practice and stimulating interaction between the two. The refereed papers in the journal cover all the major sectors of the industry (airlines, airports, air traffic management) as well as related areas such as tourism management and logistics. Papers are blind reviewed, normally by two referees, chosen for their specialist knowledge. The journal provides independent, original and rigorous analysis in the areas of: • Policy, regulation and law • Strategy • Operations • Marketing • Economics and finance • Sustainability
期刊最新文献
Stochastic infection risk models for aircraft seat assignment considering passenger vaccination status and seat location Addressing the impact of airport pricing, investment and operations on greenhouse gas emissions Editorial Board A privacy-preserving federated learning approach for airline upgrade optimization Exploring prediction accuracy for optimal taxi times in airport operations using various machine learning models
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1