Understanding value of digital service delivery by governments in Mexico

IF 7.8 1区 管理学 Q1 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Government Information Quarterly Pub Date : 2024-04-30 DOI:10.1016/j.giq.2024.101936
Battulga Buyannemekh , Sergio Picazo-Vela , Dolores E. Luna , Luis F. Luna-Reyes
{"title":"Understanding value of digital service delivery by governments in Mexico","authors":"Battulga Buyannemekh ,&nbsp;Sergio Picazo-Vela ,&nbsp;Dolores E. Luna ,&nbsp;Luis F. Luna-Reyes","doi":"10.1016/j.giq.2024.101936","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Over the years, governments have leveraged various technologies to streamline internal operations for greater efficiency and to create value through digitally delivered public services (i.e., digital services) for several stakeholders, including citizens. While prior studies have contributed to understanding the institutional and organizational determinants of government digital services, much less is known about their utilization and the actual public value they generate from the perspective of the citizen, particularly in developing countries. Some research on technology, economic, and other social divides even suggests that both the use and value of digital services are potentially limited. In this paper, we apply the Delone and McLean model, a well-established information systems theory, to examine citizens' use of government digital services and their perceptions of public value derived from such use. Based on data from a comprehensive national phone survey across 32 Mexican States with 4300 respondents, our structural equation modeling reveals that system quality is the most significant predictor of use and user satisfaction with digital services. Furthermore, use and user satisfaction lead to public value as measured by the conveniences, flexibilities, and process simplifications the system affords. Our study contributes to digital government literature by using the concept of public value as a measure of digital government services' impact and success from the perspective of the citizens.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48258,"journal":{"name":"Government Information Quarterly","volume":"41 2","pages":"Article 101936"},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Government Information Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0740624X24000285","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Over the years, governments have leveraged various technologies to streamline internal operations for greater efficiency and to create value through digitally delivered public services (i.e., digital services) for several stakeholders, including citizens. While prior studies have contributed to understanding the institutional and organizational determinants of government digital services, much less is known about their utilization and the actual public value they generate from the perspective of the citizen, particularly in developing countries. Some research on technology, economic, and other social divides even suggests that both the use and value of digital services are potentially limited. In this paper, we apply the Delone and McLean model, a well-established information systems theory, to examine citizens' use of government digital services and their perceptions of public value derived from such use. Based on data from a comprehensive national phone survey across 32 Mexican States with 4300 respondents, our structural equation modeling reveals that system quality is the most significant predictor of use and user satisfaction with digital services. Furthermore, use and user satisfaction lead to public value as measured by the conveniences, flexibilities, and process simplifications the system affords. Our study contributes to digital government literature by using the concept of public value as a measure of digital government services' impact and success from the perspective of the citizens.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
了解墨西哥政府提供数字化服务的价值
多年来,各国政府利用各种技术简化内部运作以提高效率,并通过以数字方式提供的公共服务(即数字服务)为包括公民在内的多个利益相关方创造价值。虽然以往的研究有助于了解政府数字服务的制度和组织决定因素,但从公民的角度来看,尤其是在发展中国家,对数字服务的利用及其产生的实际公共价值却知之甚少。一些关于技术、经济和其他社会差异的研究甚至表明,数字服务的使用和价值都可能是有限的。在本文中,我们运用 Delone 和 McLean 模型(一种成熟的信息系统理论)来研究公民对政府数字服务的使用情况,以及他们对这种使用所产生的公共价值的看法。基于对墨西哥 32 个州 4300 名受访者进行的全国性电话调查数据,我们的结构方程模型显示,系统质量是预测数字服务使用情况和用户满意度的最重要因素。此外,使用率和用户满意度还能带来公共价值,公共价值的衡量标准是系统提供的便利性、灵活性和流程简化程度。我们的研究从公民的角度出发,使用公共价值的概念来衡量数字政府服务的影响和成功,从而为数字政府文献做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Government Information Quarterly
Government Information Quarterly INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
15.70
自引率
16.70%
发文量
106
期刊介绍: Government Information Quarterly (GIQ) delves into the convergence of policy, information technology, government, and the public. It explores the impact of policies on government information flows, the role of technology in innovative government services, and the dynamic between citizens and governing bodies in the digital age. GIQ serves as a premier journal, disseminating high-quality research and insights that bridge the realms of policy, information technology, government, and public engagement.
期刊最新文献
A more secure framework for open government data sharing based on federated learning Does trust in government moderate the perception towards deepfakes? Comparative perspectives from Asia on the risks of AI and misinformation for democracy Open government data and self-efficacy: The empirical evidence of micro foundation via survey experiments Transforming towards inclusion-by-design: Information system design principles shaping data-driven financial inclusiveness Bridging the gap: Towards an expanded toolkit for AI-driven decision-making in the public sector
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1