Evaluation of mandibular trabecular bone structure in growing children with Class I, II, and III malocclusions using fractal analysis: A retrospective study
{"title":"Evaluation of mandibular trabecular bone structure in growing children with Class I, II, and III malocclusions using fractal analysis: A retrospective study","authors":"Hümeyra Tercanlı , Esra Bolat Gümüş","doi":"10.1016/j.ortho.2024.100875","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The present study aimed to evaluate the mandibular bone structure of patients with different malocclusions by using fractal dimension (FD) analysis on dental panoramic radiographic images.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>Pre-treatment panoramic radiographic images of 103 patients were included in the study and divided into 3 groups as Class I (group 1: 0<!--> <!--><<!--> <!-->ANB<!--> <!--><<!--> <!-->5), Class II (group 2: ANB<!--> <!-->≥<!--> <!-->5), and Class III (group 3: ANB<!--> <!-->≤<!--> <!-->0) malocclusion. Five bilateral regions of interests (ROI) were selected: anterior (near the mandibular midline), premolar (between the premolars and away from the mental foramen), molar (between the molars and away from the mandibular canal), angulus (geometric centre of mandibular angle), and condylar regions (geometric centre of mandibular condyle) of the mandibular bone and mean values were recorded as the FD value of each ROI. The mean value of the five ROIs was recorded as the FD value of the patient's mandibular bone. FD values of different malocclusion groups were compared and the relationships between the age and sex parameters and FD values were evaluated.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>FD values were lower in Class I sagittal skeletal pattern than Class II and III groups in anterior ROI FD, premolar ROI FD, angulus ROI FD, and mean FD values. There were differences between Class I and Class III skeletal patterns (<em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.023 for anterior ROI FD, <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.016 for premolar ROI FD, <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.034 for angulus ROI FD, and <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.014 for mean FD). Class I and II malocclusions differed in anterior ROI FD (<em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.029) and also Classes II and III showed differences in angulus ROI FD (<em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.029).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Sagittal skeletal patterns may result in differences in the structure of the mandibular trabecular bone.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45449,"journal":{"name":"International Orthodontics","volume":"22 3","pages":"Article 100875"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Orthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1761722724000317","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
The present study aimed to evaluate the mandibular bone structure of patients with different malocclusions by using fractal dimension (FD) analysis on dental panoramic radiographic images.
Material and methods
Pre-treatment panoramic radiographic images of 103 patients were included in the study and divided into 3 groups as Class I (group 1: 0 < ANB < 5), Class II (group 2: ANB ≥ 5), and Class III (group 3: ANB ≤ 0) malocclusion. Five bilateral regions of interests (ROI) were selected: anterior (near the mandibular midline), premolar (between the premolars and away from the mental foramen), molar (between the molars and away from the mandibular canal), angulus (geometric centre of mandibular angle), and condylar regions (geometric centre of mandibular condyle) of the mandibular bone and mean values were recorded as the FD value of each ROI. The mean value of the five ROIs was recorded as the FD value of the patient's mandibular bone. FD values of different malocclusion groups were compared and the relationships between the age and sex parameters and FD values were evaluated.
Results
FD values were lower in Class I sagittal skeletal pattern than Class II and III groups in anterior ROI FD, premolar ROI FD, angulus ROI FD, and mean FD values. There were differences between Class I and Class III skeletal patterns (P = 0.023 for anterior ROI FD, P = 0.016 for premolar ROI FD, P = 0.034 for angulus ROI FD, and P = 0.014 for mean FD). Class I and II malocclusions differed in anterior ROI FD (P = 0.029) and also Classes II and III showed differences in angulus ROI FD (P = 0.029).
Conclusion
Sagittal skeletal patterns may result in differences in the structure of the mandibular trabecular bone.
材料和方法 研究纳入103例患者的治疗前全景X光图像,并将其分为3组,即I类(第1组:0< ANB <5)、II类(第2组:ANB≥5)和III类(第3组:ANB≤0)错颌畸形。选取了下颌骨的五个双侧兴趣区(ROI):前牙区(靠近下颌中线)、前磨牙区(前磨牙之间,远离智齿孔)、磨牙区(磨牙之间,远离下颌管)、内眦区(下颌角的几何中心)和髁状突区(下颌髁状突的几何中心),并记录了平均值作为每个 ROI 的 FD 值。五个 ROI 的平均值记录为患者下颌骨的 FD 值。比较了不同错颌畸形组的FD值,并评估了年龄和性别参数与FD值之间的关系。结果Ⅰ类矢状骨骼模式的前牙ROI FD值、前磨牙ROI FD值、内眦ROI FD值和平均FD值均低于Ⅱ类和Ⅲ类。I 类和 III 类骨骼模式之间存在差异(前牙 ROI FD 的 P = 0.023,前磨牙 ROI FD 的 P = 0.016,内眦 ROI FD 的 P = 0.034,平均 FD 的 P = 0.014)。Ⅰ类和Ⅱ类畸形在前牙ROI FD上存在差异(P = 0.029),Ⅱ类和Ⅲ类在内侧ROI FD上也存在差异(P = 0.029)。
期刊介绍:
Une revue de référence dans le domaine de orthodontie et des disciplines frontières Your reference in dentofacial orthopedics International Orthodontics adresse aux orthodontistes, aux dentistes, aux stomatologistes, aux chirurgiens maxillo-faciaux et aux plasticiens de la face, ainsi quà leurs assistant(e)s. International Orthodontics is addressed to orthodontists, dentists, stomatologists, maxillofacial surgeons and facial plastic surgeons, as well as their assistants.