Opportunity Hoarding and Elite Reproduction: School Segregation in Post-Apartheid South Africa

IF 3.3 1区 社会学 Q1 SOCIOLOGY Social Forces Pub Date : 2024-04-30 DOI:10.1093/sf/soae070
Rob J Gruijters, Benjamin Elbers, Vijay Reddy
{"title":"Opportunity Hoarding and Elite Reproduction: School Segregation in Post-Apartheid South Africa","authors":"Rob J Gruijters, Benjamin Elbers, Vijay Reddy","doi":"10.1093/sf/soae070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"School integration is an important indicator of equality of opportunity and racial reconciliation in contemporary South Africa. Despite its prominence in public and political discourse, however, there is no systemic evidence on the levels and patterns of school segregation. Drawing on the literature on the post-apartheid political settlement and sociological theories of opportunity hoarding, we explain how the small White minority and, to a lesser extent, the new Black middle class monopolized access to South Africa’s most prestigious schools following the abolition of de jure segregation in 1994. Using the 2021 Annual School Survey—an administrative dataset covering all South African schools—and the 2019 Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study school survey, we find very high levels of school segregation along racial as well as socioeconomic lines. White students almost exclusively attend former White schools, have little exposure to the low-income Black majority, and are vastly overrepresented in elite public and private schools. We argue that in South Africa and other contexts with under-resourced education systems, elite capture of the few high-performing schools serves to reproduce race and class privilege.","PeriodicalId":48400,"journal":{"name":"Social Forces","volume":"107 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Forces","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/soae070","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

School integration is an important indicator of equality of opportunity and racial reconciliation in contemporary South Africa. Despite its prominence in public and political discourse, however, there is no systemic evidence on the levels and patterns of school segregation. Drawing on the literature on the post-apartheid political settlement and sociological theories of opportunity hoarding, we explain how the small White minority and, to a lesser extent, the new Black middle class monopolized access to South Africa’s most prestigious schools following the abolition of de jure segregation in 1994. Using the 2021 Annual School Survey—an administrative dataset covering all South African schools—and the 2019 Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study school survey, we find very high levels of school segregation along racial as well as socioeconomic lines. White students almost exclusively attend former White schools, have little exposure to the low-income Black majority, and are vastly overrepresented in elite public and private schools. We argue that in South Africa and other contexts with under-resourced education systems, elite capture of the few high-performing schools serves to reproduce race and class privilege.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
机会囤积与精英复制:种族隔离后南非的学校隔离
学校一体化是当代南非机会平等和种族和解的一个重要指标。尽管它在公共和政治言论中占据重要地位,但却没有系统的证据表明学校隔离的程度和模式。借鉴种族隔离后政治解决的相关文献以及机会囤积的社会学理论,我们解释了在 1994 年废除法律上的种族隔离后,少数白人以及在较小程度上的新兴黑人中产阶级是如何垄断南非最负盛名的学校的。利用 2021 年年度学校调查(涵盖南非所有学校的行政数据集)和 2019 年国际数学与科学研究趋势学校调查,我们发现学校在种族和社会经济方面的隔离程度非常高。白人学生几乎都在以前的白人学校就读,很少接触到低收入的黑人多数群体,而在公立和私立精英学校就读的白人学生人数却远远超过了白人。我们认为,在南非和其他教育系统资源不足的情况下,精英占据少数成绩优秀的学校,是种族和阶级特权的再现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Social Forces
Social Forces SOCIOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
123
期刊介绍: Established in 1922, Social Forces is recognized as a global leader among social research journals. Social Forces publishes articles of interest to a general social science audience and emphasizes cutting-edge sociological inquiry as well as explores realms the discipline shares with psychology, anthropology, political science, history, and economics. Social Forces is published by Oxford University Press in partnership with the Department of Sociology at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
期刊最新文献
Entering the mainstream economy? Workplace segregation and immigrant assimilation Defenders of the status quo: energy protests and policy (in)action in Sweden A room of one’s own? The consequences of living density on individual well-being and social anomie Can fertility decline help explain gender pay convergence? Double standards in status ascriptions? The role of gender, behaviors, and social networks in status orders among adolescents
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1