Intervenciones no farmacológicas para reducir el uso de contenciones mecánicas en las unidades de críticos

IF 1.1 Q3 NURSING Enfermeria Intensiva Pub Date : 2024-04-01 DOI:10.1016/j.enfi.2023.11.002
G. Via-Clavero RN, MSc, PhD , M. Acevedo Nuevo RN, MSc, PhD , D. Gil-Castillejos RN, MSc, PhD , J.J. Rodríguez Mondéjar RN, MSc, PhD , D. Alonso Crespo RN, MSc
{"title":"Intervenciones no farmacológicas para reducir el uso de contenciones mecánicas en las unidades de críticos","authors":"G. Via-Clavero RN, MSc, PhD ,&nbsp;M. Acevedo Nuevo RN, MSc, PhD ,&nbsp;D. Gil-Castillejos RN, MSc, PhD ,&nbsp;J.J. Rodríguez Mondéjar RN, MSc, PhD ,&nbsp;D. Alonso Crespo RN, MSc","doi":"10.1016/j.enfi.2023.11.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Physical restraint use in critical care units is a frequent low-value care practice influenced by numerous factors creating a local culture. The translation of evidence-based recommendations into clinical practice is scarce so, the analysis of interventions to de-adopt this practice is needed. This update aims to describe and identify nonpharmacological interventions that contribute to minimizing the use of physical restraints in adult critically ill patients. Interventions are classified into 2 groups: those that include education alone and those that combine training with one or more components (multicomponent interventions). These components include less restrictive restraint alternatives, use of physical and cognitive stimulation, decision support tools, institutional multidisciplinary committees, and team involvement. The heterogeneity in the design of the programs and the low quality of the evidence of the interventions do not allow us to establish recommendations on their effectiveness. However, multicomponent interventions including training, physical and cognitive stimulation of the patient and a culture change of professionals and the organizations towards making restraints visible might be the most effective. The implementation of these programs should underpin on a prior analysis of each local context to design the most effective-tailored combination of interventions to help reduce or eliminate them from clinical practice.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":43993,"journal":{"name":"Enfermeria Intensiva","volume":"35 2","pages":"Pages e8-e16"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Enfermeria Intensiva","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1130239924000166","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Physical restraint use in critical care units is a frequent low-value care practice influenced by numerous factors creating a local culture. The translation of evidence-based recommendations into clinical practice is scarce so, the analysis of interventions to de-adopt this practice is needed. This update aims to describe and identify nonpharmacological interventions that contribute to minimizing the use of physical restraints in adult critically ill patients. Interventions are classified into 2 groups: those that include education alone and those that combine training with one or more components (multicomponent interventions). These components include less restrictive restraint alternatives, use of physical and cognitive stimulation, decision support tools, institutional multidisciplinary committees, and team involvement. The heterogeneity in the design of the programs and the low quality of the evidence of the interventions do not allow us to establish recommendations on their effectiveness. However, multicomponent interventions including training, physical and cognitive stimulation of the patient and a culture change of professionals and the organizations towards making restraints visible might be the most effective. The implementation of these programs should underpin on a prior analysis of each local context to design the most effective-tailored combination of interventions to help reduce or eliminate them from clinical practice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在重症监护病房减少使用机械束缚的非药物干预措施
在重症监护病房中使用物理约束是一种常见的低价值护理实践,受到许多因素的影响,形成了一种地方文化。将以证据为基础的建议转化为临床实践的案例很少,因此需要对干预措施进行分析,以消除这种做法。本次更新旨在描述和识别有助于尽量减少对成年重症患者使用物理约束的非药物干预措施。干预措施分为两类:仅包括教育的干预措施和将培训与一个或多个组成部分相结合的干预措施(多组成部分干预措施)。这些组成部分包括限制性较小的约束替代方法、使用物理和认知刺激、决策支持工具、机构多学科委员会和团队参与。由于方案设计的异质性和干预措施证据的低质量,我们无法就其有效性提出建议。然而,包括培训、对患者进行身体和认知刺激以及改变专业人员和组织的文化,使限制措施可见化在内的多成分干预措施可能是最有效的。这些计划的实施应基于对每个地方情况的事先分析,以设计出最有效的干预措施组合,帮助减少或消除临床实践中的束缚。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
23.10%
发文量
48
期刊介绍: Enfermería Intensiva es el medio de comunicación por antonomasia para todos los profesionales de enfermería españoles que desarrollan su actividad profesional en las unidades de cuidados intensivos o en cualquier otro lugar donde se atiende al paciente crítico. Enfermería Intensiva publica cuatro números al año, cuyos temas son específicos para la enfermería de cuidados intensivos. Es la única publicación en español con carácter nacional y está indexada en prestigiosas bases de datos como International Nursing Index, MEDLINE, Índice de Enfermería, Cuiden, Índice Médico Español, Toxline, etc.
期刊最新文献
Punción ecoguiada versus técnica tradicional para la extracción de gasometrías arteriales en adultos: una revisión sistemática Perspectiva de género en la realización de la higiene en cuidados intensivos cardiológicos Barriers to reporting adverse events from the perspective of ICU nurses: A mixed-method study Drug interactions in a coronary care unit: Adversity or therapeutic success? Utilización de un sistema de valoración para la asignación de recurso humano en el transporte intrahospitalario del paciente ingresado en una unidad de cuidados intensivos
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1