The utility of telematics data for estimating the prevalence of driver handheld cellphone use, 2019–2022

IF 4.4 2区 工程技术 Q1 ERGONOMICS Journal of Safety Research Pub Date : 2024-05-04 DOI:10.1016/j.jsr.2024.04.003
Ian J. Reagan, Jessica B. Cicchino, Eric R. Teoh
{"title":"The utility of telematics data for estimating the prevalence of driver handheld cellphone use, 2019–2022","authors":"Ian J. Reagan,&nbsp;Jessica B. Cicchino,&nbsp;Eric R. Teoh","doi":"10.1016/j.jsr.2024.04.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><em>Introduction:</em> Driver distraction from handheld cellphone use contributes to fatal crashes every year but is underreported in terms of the proportion of crashes attributed to any distraction or cellphone use specifically. Existing methods to estimate the prevalence of cellphone distractions are also limited (e.g., observing drivers stopped at intersections, when crash risk is low). Our study used data from Cambridge Mobile Telematics to estimate the prevalence of drivers’ handheld calls and cellphone manipulation while driving, with “cellphone motion” based on movement recorded by the phones’ gyroscopes used as a surrogate for manipulation. <em>Method:</em> We compared the telematics measures with the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration’s roadside observations of driver electronic device use, and logistic regression tested relationships between regional, legislative, and temporal factors and the odds of cellphone behaviors occurring on a trip or at a given point in time. <em>Results:</em> Results showed 3.5% of trips included at least one handheld phone call and 33.3% included at least an instance of cellphone motion, with handheld calls occurring during 0.78% of overall trip duration and cellphone motion during 2.4% of trip duration. <em>Conclusions:</em> Correspondence between trends in cellphone distractions across regional, legislative, and temporal factors suggest telematics data have considerable utility and appear to complement existing datasets.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48224,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Safety Research","volume":"89 ","pages":"Pages 299-305"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Safety Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002243752400046X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ERGONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Driver distraction from handheld cellphone use contributes to fatal crashes every year but is underreported in terms of the proportion of crashes attributed to any distraction or cellphone use specifically. Existing methods to estimate the prevalence of cellphone distractions are also limited (e.g., observing drivers stopped at intersections, when crash risk is low). Our study used data from Cambridge Mobile Telematics to estimate the prevalence of drivers’ handheld calls and cellphone manipulation while driving, with “cellphone motion” based on movement recorded by the phones’ gyroscopes used as a surrogate for manipulation. Method: We compared the telematics measures with the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration’s roadside observations of driver electronic device use, and logistic regression tested relationships between regional, legislative, and temporal factors and the odds of cellphone behaviors occurring on a trip or at a given point in time. Results: Results showed 3.5% of trips included at least one handheld phone call and 33.3% included at least an instance of cellphone motion, with handheld calls occurring during 0.78% of overall trip duration and cellphone motion during 2.4% of trip duration. Conclusions: Correspondence between trends in cellphone distractions across regional, legislative, and temporal factors suggest telematics data have considerable utility and appear to complement existing datasets.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2019-2022 年远程信息处理数据在估算驾驶员手持手机使用率方面的实用性
导言:驾驶员因手持手机而分心每年都会造成致命的交通事故,但就任何分心或特别使用手机造成的交通事故比例而言,相关报道却不足。估算手机分心发生率的现有方法也很有限(例如,在碰撞风险较低的十字路口观察停车的驾驶员)。我们的研究利用剑桥移动远程信息处理系统的数据来估算驾驶员开车时手持电话和操纵手机的普遍程度,其中 "手机移动 "是基于手机陀螺仪记录的移动作为操纵的代用指标。方法:我们将远程信息处理措施与美国国家公路交通安全管理局对驾驶员电子设备使用情况的路边观察结果进行了比较,并用逻辑回归法测试了地区、立法和时间因素与驾驶途中或特定时间点发生手机行为几率之间的关系。结果显示结果显示,3.5% 的行程中至少有一次手持电话通话,33.3% 的行程中至少有一次手机移动,其中手持电话通话占整个行程时间的 0.78%,手机移动占整个行程时间的 2.4%。结论手机分心的趋势与地区、立法和时间因素之间的对应关系表明,远程信息处理数据具有相当大的实用性,似乎可以补充现有的数据集。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
4.90%
发文量
174
审稿时长
61 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Safety Research is an interdisciplinary publication that provides for the exchange of ideas and scientific evidence capturing studies through research in all areas of safety and health, including traffic, workplace, home, and community. This forum invites research using rigorous methodologies, encourages translational research, and engages the global scientific community through various partnerships (e.g., this outreach includes highlighting some of the latest findings from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention).
期刊最新文献
Assessing impacts of traffic signal countdown timers on safety and efficiency at signalized intersections Gait instability in community-dwelling older fallers: How visual search behaviors reveal hidden fall risk Walking the talk of safety: Exploring the organizational safety-contingency system and its relationship with safety leadership Nonfatal work-related injuries treated in hospital emergency departments in the U.S., 2012–2023 Modeling speed limit compliance in shared spaces
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1