Comparative analysis of battery energy storage systems’ operation strategies for peak shaving in industries with or without installed photovoltaic capacity

IF 4.2 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS Renewable Energy Focus Pub Date : 2024-04-30 DOI:10.1016/j.ref.2024.100574
César Cienfuegos , Pedro M. Rodrigo , Iván Cienfuegos , Arturo Diaz-Ponce
{"title":"Comparative analysis of battery energy storage systems’ operation strategies for peak shaving in industries with or without installed photovoltaic capacity","authors":"César Cienfuegos ,&nbsp;Pedro M. Rodrigo ,&nbsp;Iván Cienfuegos ,&nbsp;Arturo Diaz-Ponce","doi":"10.1016/j.ref.2024.100574","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Battery energy storage systems can address energy security and stability challenges during peak loads. This study examines the integration of such systems for peak shaving in industries, whether or not they have photovoltaic capacity. The battery-sizing problem has been analyzed extensively. However, most analyses assume a specific battery operation strategy and ignore the impact of battery-charging schemes on system behavior. In this paper, the authors compare three different operation strategies for charging batteries in an industrial peak-shaving application based on historical demand data from a large electricity consumer in El Salvador. The three strategies are fast charging, time-based charging, and low-power threshold charging. The study analyzes the possible integration of a photovoltaic system with two different sizes for a range of battery sizes (from 250 to 1,500 kWh capacity), examining optimal peak shaving levels, economic savings, and battery degradation. Results indicate that fast-charging reduces monthly billing but degrades batteries faster. The estimated lithium-ion battery lifespan is 10-10.5 years, with a maximum difference of five months. These differences could affect the life cycle economics due to the high costs of battery replacement. The economic savings achieved by the peak shaving operation of the storage system are not enough to compensate the battery investment in this study. However, other case studies with different load profiles or other locations with more expensive electricity tariffs could make the adoption of these systems economically viable.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":29780,"journal":{"name":"Renewable Energy Focus","volume":"49 ","pages":"Article 100574"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable Energy Focus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1755008424000383","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Battery energy storage systems can address energy security and stability challenges during peak loads. This study examines the integration of such systems for peak shaving in industries, whether or not they have photovoltaic capacity. The battery-sizing problem has been analyzed extensively. However, most analyses assume a specific battery operation strategy and ignore the impact of battery-charging schemes on system behavior. In this paper, the authors compare three different operation strategies for charging batteries in an industrial peak-shaving application based on historical demand data from a large electricity consumer in El Salvador. The three strategies are fast charging, time-based charging, and low-power threshold charging. The study analyzes the possible integration of a photovoltaic system with two different sizes for a range of battery sizes (from 250 to 1,500 kWh capacity), examining optimal peak shaving levels, economic savings, and battery degradation. Results indicate that fast-charging reduces monthly billing but degrades batteries faster. The estimated lithium-ion battery lifespan is 10-10.5 years, with a maximum difference of five months. These differences could affect the life cycle economics due to the high costs of battery replacement. The economic savings achieved by the peak shaving operation of the storage system are not enough to compensate the battery investment in this study. However, other case studies with different load profiles or other locations with more expensive electricity tariffs could make the adoption of these systems economically viable.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
电池储能系统在有或没有光伏发电装机容量的行业中调峰运行策略的比较分析
电池储能系统可以应对高峰负荷期间的能源安全和稳定性挑战。本研究探讨了在工业中整合此类系统以实现削峰填谷的问题,无论这些工业是否拥有光伏发电能力。电池大小问题已被广泛分析。然而,大多数分析都假设了特定的电池运行策略,而忽略了电池充电方案对系统行为的影响。在本文中,作者根据萨尔瓦多一家大型用电企业的历史需求数据,比较了在工业调峰应用中电池充电的三种不同运行策略。这三种策略分别是快速充电、基于时间的充电和低功率阈值充电。该研究分析了两种不同规模的光伏系统与一系列电池容量(从 250 千瓦时到 1,500 千瓦时)的可能集成,考察了最佳削峰水平、经济节约和电池退化。结果表明,快速充电可减少每月账单,但电池老化速度更快。预计锂离子电池的使用寿命为 10-10.5 年,最大差异为 5 个月。由于更换电池的成本较高,这些差异可能会影响生命周期经济效益。在本研究中,储能系统削峰运行所实现的经济效益不足以补偿电池投资。不过,其他具有不同负载情况的案例研究或其他电价更昂贵的地点,可能会使这些系统的采用具有经济可行性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Renewable Energy Focus
Renewable Energy Focus Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
0
审稿时长
48 days
期刊最新文献
Optimal control strategy for enhancing energy efficiency of Pelamis wave energy converter: a Simulink-based simulation approach Management and control strategy of multiple frequency powers in multifrequency microgrid Emerging Trends in Active Distribution Network Fault Detection Advanced control strategies for grid-following inverter fault response: Implementation and analysis in MATLAB for protection studies in medium voltage distribution networks Exploring deep learning methods for solar photovoltaic power output forecasting: A review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1