Land Subsidence Impacts and Optimal Groundwater Management in South Africa

Nelson Ndakolute Ndahangwapo, Djiby Racine Thiam, Ariel Dinar
{"title":"Land Subsidence Impacts and Optimal Groundwater Management in South Africa","authors":"Nelson Ndakolute Ndahangwapo, Djiby Racine Thiam, Ariel Dinar","doi":"10.1007/s10640-024-00857-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Fresh surface water is increasingly becoming scarcer worldwide, leading to significant groundwater over-extraction. However, groundwater over-extraction could result in many environmental externalities including various land subsidence (LS) effects. LS causes the gradual reduction of the voids and the subsequent ground surface sinking. The loss of aquifer system storage capacity, owing to LS, is one such negative externality that is seldom discussed in the economic literature. In this paper, we investigate the indirect loss of the aquifer system storage capacity due to LS along with other direct LS negative externalities. We develop a dynamic economic optimization model for groundwater utilization and evaluate various policy instruments (quota systems, taxes on land sinking and aquifer storage loss, and packaging and sequencing of taxes and quotas) to prevent overexploitation externalities. The model is calibrated to South African data. We found that taxes on land sinking and aquifer system storage capacity reduction have a significant effect on withdrawals and water table levels. Taxes provide larger social welfare. In addition, under certain circumstances, quotas are preferable when it comes to supporting groundwater conservation practices. Packaging and sequencing provide the second largest social benefits.</p>","PeriodicalId":501498,"journal":{"name":"Environmental and Resource Economics","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental and Resource Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-024-00857-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fresh surface water is increasingly becoming scarcer worldwide, leading to significant groundwater over-extraction. However, groundwater over-extraction could result in many environmental externalities including various land subsidence (LS) effects. LS causes the gradual reduction of the voids and the subsequent ground surface sinking. The loss of aquifer system storage capacity, owing to LS, is one such negative externality that is seldom discussed in the economic literature. In this paper, we investigate the indirect loss of the aquifer system storage capacity due to LS along with other direct LS negative externalities. We develop a dynamic economic optimization model for groundwater utilization and evaluate various policy instruments (quota systems, taxes on land sinking and aquifer storage loss, and packaging and sequencing of taxes and quotas) to prevent overexploitation externalities. The model is calibrated to South African data. We found that taxes on land sinking and aquifer system storage capacity reduction have a significant effect on withdrawals and water table levels. Taxes provide larger social welfare. In addition, under certain circumstances, quotas are preferable when it comes to supporting groundwater conservation practices. Packaging and sequencing provide the second largest social benefits.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
南非的土地沉降影响和地下水优化管理
全球淡水地表水日益稀缺,导致地下水严重超采。然而,过度抽取地下水会造成许多环境外部效应,包括各种土地沉降(LS)效应。土地沉降会导致空隙逐渐减少,地表随之下沉。含水层系统储水能力的损失是经济文献中很少讨论的负面外部效应之一。在本文中,我们研究了 LS 造成的含水层系统储水能力的间接损失,以及 LS 直接造成的其他负外部性。我们建立了一个地下水利用的动态经济优化模型,并评估了各种政策工具(配额制度、土地下沉和含水层存储损失税以及税收和配额的打包和排序),以防止过度开发的外部效应。该模型根据南非数据进行了校准。我们发现,对土地下沉和含水层系统储水量减少征税对取水量和地下水位有显著影响。税收提供了更大的社会福利。此外,在某些情况下,配额更有利于支持地下水保护措施。包装和排序提供了第二大社会福利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Why Local Governments Set Climate Targets: Effects of City Size and Political Costs A Lost Opportunity? Environmental Investment Tax Incentive and Energy Efficient Technologies Escaping the Energy Poverty Trap: Policy Assessment Carbon Leakage from Fuel Taxes: Evidence from a Natural Experiment Exogenous Hazard Rates and Precautionary Behaviour in Resource Economic Dynamics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1