A Lost Opportunity? Environmental Investment Tax Incentive and Energy Efficient Technologies

Kinga B. Tchorzewska
{"title":"A Lost Opportunity? Environmental Investment Tax Incentive and Energy Efficient Technologies","authors":"Kinga B. Tchorzewska","doi":"10.1007/s10640-024-00916-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper examines the impact of the Spanish Environmental Investment (EI) tax credit on adoption of green technologies by employing data from 2567 industrial firms for 6 years. It makes use of the sudden re-introduction of the tax incentive in March 2011, that aimed at favouring energy efficient over solely pollution abating technologies. I exploit this unexpected change and perform a difference-in-differences analysis to study its effect on green investments and as an extention on green employment outcomes. The policy change, aimed at switching financing to energy efficient technologies, is assessed as semi-effective. Admittedly, it decreased investment in end-of-pipe technologies, but the investment in superior cleaner production technologies increased only for the small firms (below 50 employees), which are especially vulnerable to the capital market failure. Unfortunately, the policy change had also a few unexpected indirect effects, firms in response to the tax incentive regime modification reduced the number of their green employees and their associated salaries. In stark contrast to the decision of the Spanish government on this EI tax credit, the results of this analysis seem to be quite encouraging for the continued use of this green fiscal policy and show that the modifications in the precision of the existing fiscal policies can be successful.</p>","PeriodicalId":501498,"journal":{"name":"Environmental and Resource Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental and Resource Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-024-00916-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper examines the impact of the Spanish Environmental Investment (EI) tax credit on adoption of green technologies by employing data from 2567 industrial firms for 6 years. It makes use of the sudden re-introduction of the tax incentive in March 2011, that aimed at favouring energy efficient over solely pollution abating technologies. I exploit this unexpected change and perform a difference-in-differences analysis to study its effect on green investments and as an extention on green employment outcomes. The policy change, aimed at switching financing to energy efficient technologies, is assessed as semi-effective. Admittedly, it decreased investment in end-of-pipe technologies, but the investment in superior cleaner production technologies increased only for the small firms (below 50 employees), which are especially vulnerable to the capital market failure. Unfortunately, the policy change had also a few unexpected indirect effects, firms in response to the tax incentive regime modification reduced the number of their green employees and their associated salaries. In stark contrast to the decision of the Spanish government on this EI tax credit, the results of this analysis seem to be quite encouraging for the continued use of this green fiscal policy and show that the modifications in the precision of the existing fiscal policies can be successful.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
失去的机会?环境投资税收激励与节能技术
本文利用 2567 家工业企业 6 年来的数据,研究了西班牙环境投资(EI)税收抵免对绿色技术采用的影响。本文利用了 2011 年 3 月突然重新推出的税收激励政策,该政策旨在支持节能技术而非单纯的污染减排技术。我利用这一突如其来的变化,进行了差异分析,以研究其对绿色投资的影响,并进而研究其对绿色就业结果的影响。政策变化旨在将资金转向节能技术,被评估为半有效。诚然,它减少了对末端技术的投资,但只有小企业(50 名员工以下)增加了对优秀清洁生产技术的投资,而这些企业特别容易受到资本市场失灵的影响。遗憾的是,政策变化也产生了一些意想不到的间接影响,企业为了应对税收激励制度的调整,减少了绿色员工的数量和相关工资。与西班牙政府关于经济投资税收抵免的决定形成鲜明对比的是,本分析的结果似乎对继续使用这一绿色财政政策相当鼓舞人心,并表明对现有财政政策的精确性进行修改是可以取得成功的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Why Local Governments Set Climate Targets: Effects of City Size and Political Costs A Lost Opportunity? Environmental Investment Tax Incentive and Energy Efficient Technologies Escaping the Energy Poverty Trap: Policy Assessment Carbon Leakage from Fuel Taxes: Evidence from a Natural Experiment Exogenous Hazard Rates and Precautionary Behaviour in Resource Economic Dynamics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1