Test of Volatile Behaviors with the Asymmetric Stochastic Volatility Model: An Implementation on Nasdaq-100

IF 2 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE Risks Pub Date : 2024-05-03 DOI:10.3390/risks12050076
Elchin Suleymanov, Magsud Gubadli, Ulvi Yagubov
{"title":"Test of Volatile Behaviors with the Asymmetric Stochastic Volatility Model: An Implementation on Nasdaq-100","authors":"Elchin Suleymanov, Magsud Gubadli, Ulvi Yagubov","doi":"10.3390/risks12050076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present study aimed to investigate the presence of asymmetric stochastic volatility and leverage effects within the Nasdaq-100 index. This index is widely regarded as an important indicator for investors. We focused on the nine leading stocks within the index, which are highly popular and hold significant weight in the investment world. These stocks are Netflix, PayPal, Google, Intel, Microsoft, Amazon, Tesla, Apple, and Meta. The study covered the period between 3 January 2017 and 30 January 2023, and we employed the EViews and WinBUGS applications to conduct the analysis. We began by calculating the logarithmic difference to obtain the return series. We then performed a sample test with 100,000 iterations, excluding the first 10,000 samples to eliminate the initial bias of the coefficients. This left us with 90,000 samples for analysis. Using the results of the asymmetric stochastic volatility model, we evaluated both the Nasdaq-100 index as a whole and the volatility persistence, predictability, and correlation levels of individual stocks. This allowed us to evaluate the ability of individual stocks to represent the characteristics of the Nasdaq-100 index. Our findings revealed a dense clustering of volatility, both for the Nasdaq-100 index and the nine individual stocks. We observed that this volatility is continuous but has a predictable impact on variability. Moreover, apart from Intel, all the stocks in the model exhibited both leverage effects and the presence of asymmetric relationships, as did the Nasdaq-100 index. Overall, our results show that the characteristics of stocks in the model are like the volatility characteristic of the Nasdaq-100 index and can represent it.","PeriodicalId":21282,"journal":{"name":"Risks","volume":"94 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Risks","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/risks12050076","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present study aimed to investigate the presence of asymmetric stochastic volatility and leverage effects within the Nasdaq-100 index. This index is widely regarded as an important indicator for investors. We focused on the nine leading stocks within the index, which are highly popular and hold significant weight in the investment world. These stocks are Netflix, PayPal, Google, Intel, Microsoft, Amazon, Tesla, Apple, and Meta. The study covered the period between 3 January 2017 and 30 January 2023, and we employed the EViews and WinBUGS applications to conduct the analysis. We began by calculating the logarithmic difference to obtain the return series. We then performed a sample test with 100,000 iterations, excluding the first 10,000 samples to eliminate the initial bias of the coefficients. This left us with 90,000 samples for analysis. Using the results of the asymmetric stochastic volatility model, we evaluated both the Nasdaq-100 index as a whole and the volatility persistence, predictability, and correlation levels of individual stocks. This allowed us to evaluate the ability of individual stocks to represent the characteristics of the Nasdaq-100 index. Our findings revealed a dense clustering of volatility, both for the Nasdaq-100 index and the nine individual stocks. We observed that this volatility is continuous but has a predictable impact on variability. Moreover, apart from Intel, all the stocks in the model exhibited both leverage effects and the presence of asymmetric relationships, as did the Nasdaq-100 index. Overall, our results show that the characteristics of stocks in the model are like the volatility characteristic of the Nasdaq-100 index and can represent it.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用非对称随机波动模型测试波动行为:纳斯达克 100 指数的实施
本研究旨在调查纳斯达克 100 指数中是否存在非对称随机波动和杠杆效应。该指数被广泛视为投资者的重要指标。我们重点研究了该指数中的九大龙头股,它们在投资界非常受欢迎,并占有重要的权重。这些股票是 Netflix、PayPal、谷歌、英特尔、微软、亚马逊、特斯拉、苹果和 Meta。研究涵盖 2017 年 1 月 3 日至 2023 年 1 月 30 日期间,我们采用 EViews 和 WinBUGS 应用程序进行分析。我们首先计算对数差值,得到回报序列。然后,我们进行了 100,000 次迭代样本测试,剔除了前 10,000 次样本,以消除系数的初始偏差。这样我们就有 90,000 个样本可供分析。利用非对称随机波动率模型的结果,我们对纳斯达克 100 指数整体以及个股的波动率持续性、可预测性和相关性水平进行了评估。这使我们能够评估个股代表纳斯达克-100 指数特征的能力。我们的研究结果表明,纳斯达克-100 指数和九只个股的波动性都是密集成群的。我们观察到,这种波动是连续的,但对变异性的影响是可以预测的。此外,除英特尔外,模型中的所有股票都表现出杠杆效应和非对称关系,纳斯达克-100 指数也是如此。总之,我们的结果表明,模型中股票的特征与纳斯达克-100 指数的波动特征相似,并能代表纳斯达克-100 指数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Risks
Risks Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
22.70%
发文量
205
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Funding Illiquidity Implied by S&P 500 Derivatives Dynamics of Foreign Exchange Futures Trading Volumes in Thailand Automated Machine Learning and Asset Pricing What Drives Banks to Provide Green Loans? Corporate Governance and Ownership Structure Perspectives of Vietnamese Listed Banks Trends and Risks in Mergers and Acquisitions: A Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1