Interpreting hydroxychloroquine blood levels for medication non-adherence: a pharmacokinetic study

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 RHEUMATOLOGY Lupus Science & Medicine Pub Date : 2024-04-01 DOI:10.1136/lupus-2023-001090
Stephen Balevic, Kai Sun, Jennifer L Rogers, Amanda Eudy, Rebecca Eli Sadun, Mithu Maheswaranathan, Jayanth Doss, Lisa Criscione-Schreiber, Tyler O'Malley, Megan Clowse, Daniel Weiner
{"title":"Interpreting hydroxychloroquine blood levels for medication non-adherence: a pharmacokinetic study","authors":"Stephen Balevic, Kai Sun, Jennifer L Rogers, Amanda Eudy, Rebecca Eli Sadun, Mithu Maheswaranathan, Jayanth Doss, Lisa Criscione-Schreiber, Tyler O'Malley, Megan Clowse, Daniel Weiner","doi":"10.1136/lupus-2023-001090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective Characterise the relationship between hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) blood levels and the number of missed doses, accounting for dosage, dose timing and the large variability in pharmacokinetics (PK) between patients. Methods We externally validated a published PK model and then conducted dosing simulations. We developed a virtual population of 1000 patients for each dosage across a range of body weights and PK variability. Using the model, 10 Monte Carlo simulations for each patient were conducted to derive predicted whole blood concentrations every hour over 24 hours (240 000 HCQ levels at steady state). To determine the impact of missed doses on levels, we randomly deleted a fixed proportion of doses. Results For patients receiving HCQ 400 mg daily, simulated random blood levels <200 ng/mL were exceedingly uncommon in fully adherent patients (<0.1%). In comparison, with 80% of doses missed, approximately 60% of concentrations were <200 ng/mL. However, this cut-off was highly insensitive and would miss many instances of severe non-adherence. Average levels quickly dropped to <200 ng/mL after 2–4 days of missed doses. Additionally, mean levels decreased by 29.9% between peak and trough measurements. Conclusions We propose an algorithm to optimally interpret HCQ blood levels and approximate the number of missed doses, incorporating the impact of dosage, dose timing and pharmacokinetic variability. No single cut-off has adequate combinations of both sensitivity and specificity, and cut-offs are dependent on the degree of targeted non-adherence. Future studies should measure trough concentrations to better identify target HCQ levels for non-adherence and efficacy. Data are available upon reasonable request. The pharmacokinetic model used for dosing simulations is publicly available from the original publication.","PeriodicalId":18126,"journal":{"name":"Lupus Science & Medicine","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lupus Science & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/lupus-2023-001090","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective Characterise the relationship between hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) blood levels and the number of missed doses, accounting for dosage, dose timing and the large variability in pharmacokinetics (PK) between patients. Methods We externally validated a published PK model and then conducted dosing simulations. We developed a virtual population of 1000 patients for each dosage across a range of body weights and PK variability. Using the model, 10 Monte Carlo simulations for each patient were conducted to derive predicted whole blood concentrations every hour over 24 hours (240 000 HCQ levels at steady state). To determine the impact of missed doses on levels, we randomly deleted a fixed proportion of doses. Results For patients receiving HCQ 400 mg daily, simulated random blood levels <200 ng/mL were exceedingly uncommon in fully adherent patients (<0.1%). In comparison, with 80% of doses missed, approximately 60% of concentrations were <200 ng/mL. However, this cut-off was highly insensitive and would miss many instances of severe non-adherence. Average levels quickly dropped to <200 ng/mL after 2–4 days of missed doses. Additionally, mean levels decreased by 29.9% between peak and trough measurements. Conclusions We propose an algorithm to optimally interpret HCQ blood levels and approximate the number of missed doses, incorporating the impact of dosage, dose timing and pharmacokinetic variability. No single cut-off has adequate combinations of both sensitivity and specificity, and cut-offs are dependent on the degree of targeted non-adherence. Future studies should measure trough concentrations to better identify target HCQ levels for non-adherence and efficacy. Data are available upon reasonable request. The pharmacokinetic model used for dosing simulations is publicly available from the original publication.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
解读羟氯喹血药浓度对用药不依从性的影响:一项药代动力学研究
目的 分析羟氯喹(HCQ)血药浓度与漏服次数之间的关系,同时考虑剂量、服药时间以及患者之间药代动力学(PK)的巨大差异。方法 我们对已发表的 PK 模型进行了外部验证,然后进行了剂量模拟。我们建立了一个由 1000 名患者组成的虚拟群体,在不同体重和 PK 变异范围内使用不同剂量。利用该模型,我们对每位患者进行了 10 次蒙特卡洛模拟,以得出 24 小时内每小时的预测全血浓度(稳态时为 240 000 HCQ 水平)。为了确定漏服剂量对浓度水平的影响,我们随机删除了固定比例的剂量。结果 对于每天服用 400 毫克 HCQ 的患者,模拟随机血药浓度小于 200 毫微克/毫升的情况在完全依从的患者中极为罕见(小于 0.1%)。相比之下,在漏服 80% 剂量的情况下,约有 60% 的血药浓度小于 200 毫微克/毫升。然而,这种截断值非常不敏感,会漏掉许多严重不依从的情况。漏服 2-4 天后,平均水平迅速降至 <200 纳克/毫升。此外,在峰值和谷值测量之间,平均水平下降了 29.9%。结论 我们提出了一种算法,用于最佳解释 HCQ 血药浓度并大致估算漏服次数,同时考虑到剂量、服药时间和药代动力学变异的影响。没有一种临界值能同时兼顾灵敏度和特异性,临界值取决于目标不依从的程度。未来的研究应测量谷浓度,以更好地确定不依从性和疗效的目标 HCQ 水平。如有合理要求,可提供相关数据。用于剂量模拟的药代动力学模型可从原始出版物中公开获取。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Lupus Science & Medicine
Lupus Science & Medicine RHEUMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
88
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Lupus Science & Medicine is a global, peer reviewed, open access online journal that provides a central point for publication of basic, clinical, translational, and epidemiological studies of all aspects of lupus and related diseases. It is the first lupus-specific open access journal in the world and was developed in response to the need for a barrier-free forum for publication of groundbreaking studies in lupus. The journal publishes research on lupus from fields including, but not limited to: rheumatology, dermatology, nephrology, immunology, pediatrics, cardiology, hepatology, pulmonology, obstetrics and gynecology, and psychiatry.
期刊最新文献
Comparison of a voclosporin-based triple immunosuppressive therapy to high-dose glucocorticoid-based immunosuppressive therapy: a propensity analysis of the AURA-LV and AURORA 1 studies and ALMS. Using photovoice to investigate patient experiences of lupus nephritis in Canada. Effect of hydroxychloroquine on pregnancy outcome in patients with SLE: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Improving routine mental health screening for depression and anxiety in a paediatric lupus clinic: a quality improvement initiative for enhanced mental healthcare. Validating claims-based algorithms for a systemic lupus erythematosus diagnosis in Medicare data for informed use of the Lupus Index: a tool for geospatial research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1