Analysis of the effect of landscape component classification on landscape diversity index

IF 2.5 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Environmental Research Communications Pub Date : 2024-05-02 DOI:10.1088/2515-7620/ad4106
Biao Ma, Quanxi Li, Zixuan Mao and Xuelu Liu
{"title":"Analysis of the effect of landscape component classification on landscape diversity index","authors":"Biao Ma, Quanxi Li, Zixuan Mao and Xuelu Liu","doi":"10.1088/2515-7620/ad4106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The landscape diversity index (LDI) is an important level in biodiversity conservation, and its scale dependence has an important role in regional landscape planning and biological conservation. The aim of this study is to analyze in depth the effects of spatial scale changes in the classification of different landscape components on LDI and to explore the thresholds of LDI. The classification of landscape components was accomplished in the ArcMap environment using fusion and merging tools, and the LDI thresholds and scale changes were quantitatively assessed by LDI values. The results show that there are differences in LDI values for different classifications, and the threshold for LDI without considering scale changes can be interpreted as: 0.4215 ≤ LDI ≤ 1.9754. The grain sizes suitable for landscape diversity analysis are 160m and 1280 m, and the effective amplitude range of the I, II and III land type is 9~31 km, while the effective amplitude of three land use types is 20∼31 km, relatively lagging behind. However, when considering amplitude changes, the LDI threshold can be interpreted as 0.3027 ≤ LDI ≤ 2.0947, which is suitable for large-scale regional landscape diversity studies when the grain size is large. In conclusion, the essence of landscape diversity change with scale is caused by changes in the number and area of landscape components, and the threshold analysis should not only take into account the grain size and amplitude, but also consider the landscape background of the study area.","PeriodicalId":48496,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Research Communications","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Research Communications","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7620/ad4106","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The landscape diversity index (LDI) is an important level in biodiversity conservation, and its scale dependence has an important role in regional landscape planning and biological conservation. The aim of this study is to analyze in depth the effects of spatial scale changes in the classification of different landscape components on LDI and to explore the thresholds of LDI. The classification of landscape components was accomplished in the ArcMap environment using fusion and merging tools, and the LDI thresholds and scale changes were quantitatively assessed by LDI values. The results show that there are differences in LDI values for different classifications, and the threshold for LDI without considering scale changes can be interpreted as: 0.4215 ≤ LDI ≤ 1.9754. The grain sizes suitable for landscape diversity analysis are 160m and 1280 m, and the effective amplitude range of the I, II and III land type is 9~31 km, while the effective amplitude of three land use types is 20∼31 km, relatively lagging behind. However, when considering amplitude changes, the LDI threshold can be interpreted as 0.3027 ≤ LDI ≤ 2.0947, which is suitable for large-scale regional landscape diversity studies when the grain size is large. In conclusion, the essence of landscape diversity change with scale is caused by changes in the number and area of landscape components, and the threshold analysis should not only take into account the grain size and amplitude, but also consider the landscape background of the study area.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
景观成分分类对景观多样性指数的影响分析
景观多样性指数(LDI)是生物多样性保护的一个重要水平,其尺度依赖性在区域景观规划和生物保护中具有重要作用。本研究旨在深入分析不同景观成分分类的空间尺度变化对 LDI 的影响,并探索 LDI 的阈值。在 ArcMap 环境下,利用融合与合并工具完成了景观成分的分类,并通过 LDI 值对 LDI 阈值和尺度变化进行了定量评估。结果表明,不同分类的 LDI 值存在差异,不考虑尺度变化的 LDI 阈值可理解为0.4215 ≤ LDI ≤ 1.9754。适合景观多样性分析的粒度为 160m 和 1280m,Ⅰ、Ⅱ、Ⅲ类土地类型的有效振幅范围为 9~31km,而三种土地利用类型的有效振幅范围为 20~31km,相对滞后。但考虑振幅变化时,可将 LDI 门限理解为 0.3027 ≤ LDI ≤ 2.0947,当粒度较大时,适合于大尺度区域景观多样性研究。总之,景观多样性随尺度变化的本质是景观成分数量和面积的变化,阈值分析不仅要考虑粒度和幅度,还要考虑研究区域的景观背景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Research Communications
Environmental Research Communications ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
136
期刊最新文献
The truth about co-benefits: a multidimensional feasibility assessment for thailand and beyond. Assessment of bioaerosol composition and public health implications in high-traffic urban areas of Southwest, Nigeria. The impacts of climate change on violent conflict risk: a review of causal pathways. Effect of atmospheric response induced by preceding typhoon on movement of subsequent typhoon over Northwestern Pacific From consumption to context: assessing poverty and inequality across diverse socio-ecological systems in Ghana
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1