Job and off-job crafting profiles: Time-lagged relationships with job, home and personal resources and well-being outcomes

IF 4.9 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology Pub Date : 2024-04-30 DOI:10.1111/joop.12506
Kang Leng Ho, Anne Mäkikangas, Philipp Kerksieck, Anja Isabel Morstatt, Jessica de Bloom, Georg F. Bauer
{"title":"Job and off-job crafting profiles: Time-lagged relationships with job, home and personal resources and well-being outcomes","authors":"Kang Leng Ho,&nbsp;Anne Mäkikangas,&nbsp;Philipp Kerksieck,&nbsp;Anja Isabel Morstatt,&nbsp;Jessica de Bloom,&nbsp;Georg F. Bauer","doi":"10.1111/joop.12506","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Crafting research has often focused solely on the work domain or examined work and non-work life domains separately, using a variable-centered approach. Little is known about the interactions of crafting processes in the work and non-work domain. In this time-lagged study, we examined (1) the relationship between job and off-job crafting behaviours using a person-centered approach to identify crafting profiles, (2) whether job, home and personal resources differentially predicted these profiles and (3) whether these profiles differed in relation to outcomes, that is work engagement and mental well-being. We conducted a three-wave, time-lagged survey with 3-month intervals among 2125 employees. The results revealed three profiles of active (18.0%), average (48.2%) and least active (33.9%) crafters. Analyses of predictors showed that active crafters had higher levels of home developmental possibilities and self-efficacy than average and least active crafters, likewise for average crafters compared with least active crafters. Furthermore, active crafters had higher levels of social support at home than least active crafters. Regarding well-being outcomes, active crafters experienced significantly higher mental well-being than average and least active crafters and higher work engagement than least active crafters. Interventions to enhance employee's resources could stimulate crafting behaviours, ultimately improving well-being.</p>","PeriodicalId":48330,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology","volume":"97 3","pages":"952-976"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/joop.12506","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/joop.12506","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Crafting research has often focused solely on the work domain or examined work and non-work life domains separately, using a variable-centered approach. Little is known about the interactions of crafting processes in the work and non-work domain. In this time-lagged study, we examined (1) the relationship between job and off-job crafting behaviours using a person-centered approach to identify crafting profiles, (2) whether job, home and personal resources differentially predicted these profiles and (3) whether these profiles differed in relation to outcomes, that is work engagement and mental well-being. We conducted a three-wave, time-lagged survey with 3-month intervals among 2125 employees. The results revealed three profiles of active (18.0%), average (48.2%) and least active (33.9%) crafters. Analyses of predictors showed that active crafters had higher levels of home developmental possibilities and self-efficacy than average and least active crafters, likewise for average crafters compared with least active crafters. Furthermore, active crafters had higher levels of social support at home than least active crafters. Regarding well-being outcomes, active crafters experienced significantly higher mental well-being than average and least active crafters and higher work engagement than least active crafters. Interventions to enhance employee's resources could stimulate crafting behaviours, ultimately improving well-being.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
工作和非工作的工艺特征:工作、家庭和个人资源与幸福结果之间的时滞关系
手工制作研究通常只关注工作领域,或采用以变量为中心的方法,分别研究工作和非工作生活领域。人们对手工制作过程在工作领域和非工作领域的相互作用知之甚少。在这项时滞研究中,我们考察了:(1)工作和非工作加工行为之间的关系,采用以人为中心的方法来识别加工特征;(2)工作、家庭和个人资源是否对这些特征有不同的预测作用;(3)这些特征是否与结果(即工作投入度和心理健康)有关。我们对 2125 名员工进行了为期 3 个月的三波时滞调查。调查结果显示,手工艺者分为活跃型(18.0%)、一般型(48.2%)和最不活跃型(33.9%)三种类型。对预测因素的分析表明,与一般和最不活跃的手工艺者相比,活跃的手工艺者有更高的家庭发展可能性和自我效能感,同样,与最不活跃的手工艺者相比,一般的手工艺者也有更高的家庭发展可能性和自我效能感。此外,与最不活跃的手工制作者相比,活跃的手工制作者在家中获得的社会支持水平更高。在幸福感方面,活跃手工艺者的精神幸福感明显高于普通手工艺者和最不活跃的手工艺者,工作投入度也高于最不活跃的手工艺者。通过干预措施增加员工的资源可以刺激手工制作行为,最终提高幸福感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
4.80%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: The Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology aims to increase understanding of people and organisations at work including: - industrial, organizational, work, vocational and personnel psychology - behavioural and cognitive aspects of industrial relations - ergonomics and human factors Innovative or interdisciplinary approaches with a psychological emphasis are particularly welcome. So are papers which develop the links between occupational/organisational psychology and other areas of the discipline, such as social and cognitive psychology.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information How much do family‐supportive supervisor behaviours matter? A meta‐analysis based on the ability‐motivation‐opportunity framework Uneventful days? A cautionary tale about the underestimated role of triggering events in employee silence research Presenteeism pressure: The development of a scale and a nomological network Supervisor‐directed anger as a link between work–family conflict and unethical pro‐family behaviours: An attributional perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1