Auditing the prescription drug consumer price index in a changing marketplace

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 ECONOMICS Health economics Pub Date : 2024-04-29 DOI:10.1002/hec.4836
Andrew L. Hicks, Ernst R. Berndt, Richard G. Frank
{"title":"Auditing the prescription drug consumer price index in a changing marketplace","authors":"Andrew L. Hicks,&nbsp;Ernst R. Berndt,&nbsp;Richard G. Frank","doi":"10.1002/hec.4836","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Changes in the dynamics of prescription drug markets have raised issues regarding whether the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics' (BLS’) Prescription Drug Consumer Price Index (CPI-Rx) has adequately kept up with the evolving marketplace. The CPI-Rx limits its sampling frame to retail outpatient outlets and excludes prescription pharmaceuticals dispensed in non-retail settings such as hospitals, physician/clinic outpatient facilities, and nursing homes. Thus, the CPI-Rx overlooks the increasingly important specialty pharmaceuticals dispensed in non-retail settings, whose transactions are instead captured in the overall hospital and professional services component of the medical care CPI. Specialty drugs now account for about 55% of all U.S. drug spending, double the share of a decade earlier. To the extent specialty drug price growth differs from that of traditional pharmaceuticals, the CPI-Rx could provide an inaccurate measure of overall drug price inflation. We calculate a chained Laspeyres CPI using data from the Merative™ MarketScan® Databases for the years 2010–2019 and IQVIA-designated specialty drugs and offer evidence showing that by not sampling specialty drugs in non-retail settings, the CPI-Rx has understated overall U.S. prescription drug inflation by just under 75 basis points annually. We discuss implications for health care policy and suggest the BLS examine the feasibility of publishing an overall pharmaceutical price index incorporating both traditional and specialty pharmaceuticals dispensed in retail and non-retail settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":12847,"journal":{"name":"Health economics","volume":"33 8","pages":"1793-1810"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health economics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hec.4836","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Changes in the dynamics of prescription drug markets have raised issues regarding whether the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics' (BLS’) Prescription Drug Consumer Price Index (CPI-Rx) has adequately kept up with the evolving marketplace. The CPI-Rx limits its sampling frame to retail outpatient outlets and excludes prescription pharmaceuticals dispensed in non-retail settings such as hospitals, physician/clinic outpatient facilities, and nursing homes. Thus, the CPI-Rx overlooks the increasingly important specialty pharmaceuticals dispensed in non-retail settings, whose transactions are instead captured in the overall hospital and professional services component of the medical care CPI. Specialty drugs now account for about 55% of all U.S. drug spending, double the share of a decade earlier. To the extent specialty drug price growth differs from that of traditional pharmaceuticals, the CPI-Rx could provide an inaccurate measure of overall drug price inflation. We calculate a chained Laspeyres CPI using data from the Merative™ MarketScan® Databases for the years 2010–2019 and IQVIA-designated specialty drugs and offer evidence showing that by not sampling specialty drugs in non-retail settings, the CPI-Rx has understated overall U.S. prescription drug inflation by just under 75 basis points annually. We discuss implications for health care policy and suggest the BLS examine the feasibility of publishing an overall pharmaceutical price index incorporating both traditional and specialty pharmaceuticals dispensed in retail and non-retail settings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在不断变化的市场中审计处方药消费价格指数
处方药市场动态的变化引发了美国劳工统计局(BLS)的处方药消费价格指数(CPI-Rx)是否能充分跟上不断变化的市场的问题。CPI-Rx 的取样范围仅限于门诊零售店,不包括医院、医生/诊所门诊设施和疗养院等非零售场所配发的处方药。因此,《处方药消费价格指数》忽略了在非零售环境中配发的日益重要的特殊药品,这些药品的交易被纳入医疗保健消费价格指数的医院和专业服务部分。目前,特药约占美国药品总支出的 55%,是十年前的两倍。如果特药的价格增长与传统药品的价格增长存在差异,那么消费物价指数-处方药可能会对整体药品价格通胀提供一个不准确的衡量标准。我们使用 Merative™ MarketScan® 数据库中 2010-2019 年的数据和 IQVIA 指定的特药计算了链式拉斯派尔消费物价指数,并提供证据表明,由于未对非零售环境中的特药进行抽样调查,CPI-Rx 每年低估了美国处方药的整体通胀率,幅度略低于 75 个基点。我们讨论了对医疗保健政策的影响,并建议 BLS 研究发布包含在零售和非零售环境中配发的传统药品和特殊药品的总体药品价格指数的可行性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health economics
Health economics 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
4.80%
发文量
177
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: This Journal publishes articles on all aspects of health economics: theoretical contributions, empirical studies and analyses of health policy from the economic perspective. Its scope includes the determinants of health and its definition and valuation, as well as the demand for and supply of health care; planning and market mechanisms; micro-economic evaluation of individual procedures and treatments; and evaluation of the performance of health care systems. Contributions should typically be original and innovative. As a rule, the Journal does not include routine applications of cost-effectiveness analysis, discrete choice experiments and costing analyses. Editorials are regular features, these should be concise and topical. Occasionally commissioned reviews are published and special issues bring together contributions on a single topic. Health Economics Letters facilitate rapid exchange of views on topical issues. Contributions related to problems in both developed and developing countries are welcome.
期刊最新文献
The Dynamic and Heterogeneous Effects of COVID-19 Vaccination Mandates in the USA. Public Health Insurance and Healthcare Utilisation Decisions of Young Adults. Issue Information Diagnosis Related Payment for Inpatient Mental Health Care: Hospital Selection and Effects on Length of Stay. Aggregation Bias and Socioeconomic Gradients in Waiting Time for Hospital Admissions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1