Survival After Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Severe Combined Immunodeficiency (SCID): A Worldwide Review of the Prognostic Variables

IF 8.4 2区 医学 Q1 ALLERGY Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology Pub Date : 2024-04-30 DOI:10.1007/s12016-024-08993-5
Gabriela Assunção Goebel, Cíntia Silva de Assis, Luciana Araújo Oliveira Cunha, Fernanda Gontijo Minafra, Jorge Andrade Pinto
{"title":"Survival After Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Severe Combined Immunodeficiency (SCID): A Worldwide Review of the Prognostic Variables","authors":"Gabriela Assunção Goebel, Cíntia Silva de Assis, Luciana Araújo Oliveira Cunha, Fernanda Gontijo Minafra, Jorge Andrade Pinto","doi":"10.1007/s12016-024-08993-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study aims to perform an extensive review of the literature that evaluates various factors that affect the survival rates of patients with severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in developed and developing countries. An extensive search of the literature was made in four different databases (PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science). The search was carried out in December 2022 and updated in July 2023, and the terms such as “hematopoietic stem cell transplantation,” “bone marrow transplant,” “mortality,” “opportunistic infections,” and “survival” associated with “severe combined immunodeficiency” were sought based on the MeSH terms. The language of the articles was “English,” and only articles published from 2000 onwards were selected. Twenty-three articles fulfilled the inclusion criteria for review and data extraction. The data collected corroborates that early HSCT, but above all, HSCT in patients without active infections, is related to better overall survival. The universal implementation of newborn screening for SCID will be a fundamental pillar for enabling most transplants to be carried out in this “ideal scenario” at an early age and free from infection. HSCT with an HLA-identical sibling donor is also associated with better survival rates, but this is the least common scenario. For this reason, transplantation with matched unrelated donors (MUD) and mismatched related donors (mMRD/Haploidentical) appear as alternatives. The results obtained with MUD are improving and show survival rates similar to those of MSD, as well as they do not require manipulation of the graft with expensive technologies. However, they still have high rates of complications after HSCT. Transplants with mMRD/Haplo are performed just in a few large centers because of the high costs of the technology to perform CD3/CD19 depletion and TCRαβ/CD19 depletion or CD34 + selection techniques in vitro. The new possibility of in vivo T cell depletion using post-transplant cyclophosphamide could also be a viable alternative for performing mMRD transplants in centers that do not have this technology, especially in developing countries.</p>","PeriodicalId":10423,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12016-024-08993-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to perform an extensive review of the literature that evaluates various factors that affect the survival rates of patients with severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in developed and developing countries. An extensive search of the literature was made in four different databases (PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science). The search was carried out in December 2022 and updated in July 2023, and the terms such as “hematopoietic stem cell transplantation,” “bone marrow transplant,” “mortality,” “opportunistic infections,” and “survival” associated with “severe combined immunodeficiency” were sought based on the MeSH terms. The language of the articles was “English,” and only articles published from 2000 onwards were selected. Twenty-three articles fulfilled the inclusion criteria for review and data extraction. The data collected corroborates that early HSCT, but above all, HSCT in patients without active infections, is related to better overall survival. The universal implementation of newborn screening for SCID will be a fundamental pillar for enabling most transplants to be carried out in this “ideal scenario” at an early age and free from infection. HSCT with an HLA-identical sibling donor is also associated with better survival rates, but this is the least common scenario. For this reason, transplantation with matched unrelated donors (MUD) and mismatched related donors (mMRD/Haploidentical) appear as alternatives. The results obtained with MUD are improving and show survival rates similar to those of MSD, as well as they do not require manipulation of the graft with expensive technologies. However, they still have high rates of complications after HSCT. Transplants with mMRD/Haplo are performed just in a few large centers because of the high costs of the technology to perform CD3/CD19 depletion and TCRαβ/CD19 depletion or CD34 + selection techniques in vitro. The new possibility of in vivo T cell depletion using post-transplant cyclophosphamide could also be a viable alternative for performing mMRD transplants in centers that do not have this technology, especially in developing countries.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
严重联合免疫缺陷病(SCID)造血干细胞移植后的存活率:全球预后变量回顾
本研究旨在对文献进行广泛综述,评估影响发达国家和发展中国家严重合并免疫缺陷症(SCID)患者造血干细胞移植(HSCT)后存活率的各种因素。我们在四个不同的数据库(PubMed、Embase、Scopus 和 Web of Science)中进行了广泛的文献检索。检索于 2022 年 12 月进行,并于 2023 年 7 月更新,根据 MeSH 术语搜索与 "严重合并免疫缺陷 "相关的 "造血干细胞移植"、"骨髓移植"、"死亡率"、"机会性感染 "和 "存活率 "等术语。文章的语言为 "英语",且只选取 2000 年以后发表的文章。有 23 篇文章符合审查和数据提取的纳入标准。收集到的数据证实,早期造血干细胞移植,尤其是无活动性感染患者的造血干细胞移植,与更好的总体生存率有关。新生儿 SCID 筛查的普遍实施将是使大多数移植能够在这种 "理想情况 "下尽早进行且不受感染的基本支柱。与 HLA 相同的同胞捐献者进行造血干细胞移植也能提高存活率,但这是最不常见的情况。因此,匹配的非亲缘供体(MUD)和不匹配的亲缘供体(mMRD/同种异体)移植成为了替代方案。MUD 移植的结果正在改善,存活率与 MSD 相似,而且无需使用昂贵的技术对移植物进行操作。然而,造血干细胞移植后的并发症发生率仍然很高。mMRD/Haplo 移植只在少数几个大中心进行,因为在体外进行 CD3/CD19 清除、TCRαβ/CD19 清除或 CD34 + 选择技术的成本很高。使用移植后环磷酰胺进行体内 T 细胞耗竭的新方法也可能成为在不具备这种技术的中心(尤其是发展中国家)进行 mMRD 移植的可行替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
22.30
自引率
1.10%
发文量
58
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology is a scholarly journal that focuses on the advancement of clinical management in allergic and immunologic diseases. The journal publishes both scholarly reviews and experimental papers that address the current state of managing these diseases, placing new data into perspective. Each issue of the journal is dedicated to a specific theme of critical importance to allergists and immunologists, aiming to provide a comprehensive understanding of the subject matter for a wide readership. The journal is particularly helpful in explaining how novel data impacts clinical management, along with advancements such as standardized protocols for allergy skin testing and challenge procedures, as well as improved understanding of cell biology. Ultimately, the journal aims to contribute to the improvement of care and management for patients with immune-mediated diseases.
期刊最新文献
Neutrophils in Atopic Dermatitis Allergen Testing: A Review of the Indications, Procedures, and Limitations in Ocular Allergy Methylation of T and B Lymphocytes in Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases. Single-Cell Sequencing: High-Resolution Analysis of Cellular Heterogeneity in Autoimmune Diseases. Fungal Head and Neck Dermatitis: Current Understanding and Management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1