Which Drugs are More Effective in Preventing Familial Adenomatous Polyposis Progression Based on Network Meta-Analysis?

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Current pharmaceutical design Pub Date : 2024-05-03 DOI:10.2174/0113816128289465240422074745
Pei Luo, Wenjun Shi, Xianshuo Cheng, Jun Yang, Gen Pei, Jian Dong
{"title":"Which Drugs are More Effective in Preventing Familial Adenomatous Polyposis Progression Based on Network Meta-Analysis?","authors":"Pei Luo, Wenjun Shi, Xianshuo Cheng, Jun Yang, Gen Pei, Jian Dong","doi":"10.2174/0113816128289465240422074745","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) is an inherited disorder. At present, an increasing number of medications are being employed to treat FAP; however, only a few have been assessed for their efficacy and safety. Therefore, this study aimed to conduct a network meta-analysis to compare the therapeutic outcomes and adverse drug reactions of all FAP-associated medications. Method: Six relevant databases were searched to identify pertinent randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and information on the dosage and frequency of various drugs was extracted. Additionally, data on changes in polyp counts and dimensions, as well as treatment-related adverse reactions for different medications were collected. The Bayesian method was employed to directly or indirectly compare the impact of different treatment regimens on changes in polyp numbers and diameters, and the safety of the drugs was investigated. Results: CXB at 16 mg/kg/day significantly reduced polyp numbers. Celecoxib at 8 mg/kg/day and sulindac (150 mg twice daily) plus erlotinib (75 mg/day) were effective for tolerant FAP patients. Additionally, EPAFFA 2 g daily and sulindac (150 mg twice daily) plus erlotinib (75 mg/day) emerged as the most effective for reducing polyp size. Conclusion: The most effective treatment for reducing the number of colorectal polyps is celecoxib 16 mg/kg/day. On the other hand, a daily dosage of 2 g EPA-FFA demonstrates the best results in terms of decreasing colorectal polyp diameter.","PeriodicalId":10845,"journal":{"name":"Current pharmaceutical design","volume":"155 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current pharmaceutical design","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0113816128289465240422074745","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) is an inherited disorder. At present, an increasing number of medications are being employed to treat FAP; however, only a few have been assessed for their efficacy and safety. Therefore, this study aimed to conduct a network meta-analysis to compare the therapeutic outcomes and adverse drug reactions of all FAP-associated medications. Method: Six relevant databases were searched to identify pertinent randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and information on the dosage and frequency of various drugs was extracted. Additionally, data on changes in polyp counts and dimensions, as well as treatment-related adverse reactions for different medications were collected. The Bayesian method was employed to directly or indirectly compare the impact of different treatment regimens on changes in polyp numbers and diameters, and the safety of the drugs was investigated. Results: CXB at 16 mg/kg/day significantly reduced polyp numbers. Celecoxib at 8 mg/kg/day and sulindac (150 mg twice daily) plus erlotinib (75 mg/day) were effective for tolerant FAP patients. Additionally, EPAFFA 2 g daily and sulindac (150 mg twice daily) plus erlotinib (75 mg/day) emerged as the most effective for reducing polyp size. Conclusion: The most effective treatment for reducing the number of colorectal polyps is celecoxib 16 mg/kg/day. On the other hand, a daily dosage of 2 g EPA-FFA demonstrates the best results in terms of decreasing colorectal polyp diameter.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于网络 Meta 分析,哪些药物对预防家族性腺瘤性息肉病进展更有效?
背景:家族性腺瘤性息肉病(FAP)是一种遗传性疾病:家族性腺瘤性息肉病(FAP)是一种遗传性疾病。目前,治疗 FAP 的药物越来越多,但只有少数药物的疗效和安全性得到了评估。因此,本研究旨在进行网络荟萃分析,比较所有 FAP 相关药物的治疗效果和药物不良反应。方法:检索六个相关数据库以确定相关的随机对照试验(RCT),并提取各种药物的剂量和频率信息。此外,还收集了息肉数量和尺寸的变化数据,以及不同药物治疗相关的不良反应。采用贝叶斯法直接或间接比较了不同治疗方案对息肉数量和直径变化的影响,并调查了药物的安全性。研究结果16毫克/千克/天的CXB能显著减少息肉数量。8毫克/千克/天的塞来昔布和舒林酸(150毫克,每天两次)加厄洛替尼(75毫克/天)对耐受性好的FAP患者有效。此外,每天 2 克 EPAFFA 和舒林酸(150 毫克,每天两次)加厄洛替尼(75 毫克,每天一次)对减少息肉大小最有效。结论减少大肠息肉数量最有效的治疗方法是塞来昔布 16 毫克/千克/天。另一方面,每天服用 2 克 EPA-FFA 在减少大肠息肉直径方面效果最佳。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
302
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Current Pharmaceutical Design publishes timely in-depth reviews and research articles from leading pharmaceutical researchers in the field, covering all aspects of current research in rational drug design. Each issue is devoted to a single major therapeutic area guest edited by an acknowledged authority in the field. Each thematic issue of Current Pharmaceutical Design covers all subject areas of major importance to modern drug design including: medicinal chemistry, pharmacology, drug targets and disease mechanism.
期刊最新文献
Effect of the Addition of Jujuboside A from Semen Ziziphi Spinosae on Renal Inflammation in Diabetic Mice. Impact of Iron Deficiency on Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery. A Pharmacological Update and Safety Analysis of Medications for Smoking Cessation: Which Ones to Use? A Comprehensive Review of Naringin Loaded Nano Drug Delivery System in Treatment of CNS Disorders. Stimuli-Responsive Porphyrin-Based Nano Drugs for Cancer Therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1