Optimizing radiotherapy strategies for skull base chordoma: a comprehensive meta-analysis and systematic review of treatment modalities and outcomes

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neurosurgical focus Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI:10.3171/2024.2.focus2413
Lucca B. Palavani, Pedro Borges, Filipi Fim Andreão, Jordana Borges, Sávio Batista, Leonardo B. Oliveira, Márcio Yuri Ferreira, Pedro C. Abrahão Reis, Julia Pontes, Herika Negri, Andre Beer-Furlan, Chandan Krishna, Raphael Bertani, Marcio S. Rassi
{"title":"Optimizing radiotherapy strategies for skull base chordoma: a comprehensive meta-analysis and systematic review of treatment modalities and outcomes","authors":"Lucca B. Palavani, Pedro Borges, Filipi Fim Andreão, Jordana Borges, Sávio Batista, Leonardo B. Oliveira, Márcio Yuri Ferreira, Pedro C. Abrahão Reis, Julia Pontes, Herika Negri, Andre Beer-Furlan, Chandan Krishna, Raphael Bertani, Marcio S. Rassi","doi":"10.3171/2024.2.focus2413","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\n<p>In the treatment of skull base chordoma (SBC) surgery is considered the mainstay approach, and gross-total resection has an established relationship with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). However, the tumor’s location often interferes with attempts at complete resection. In this case, surgery for maximal resection followed by high-dose radiotherapy has been demonstrated to be the standard treatment. In this context, various modalities are available, yet no consensus exists on the most effective. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of different radiotherapy modalities for SBC.</p>\nMETHODS\n<p>Following PRISMA guidelines, the authors systematically searched for the treatment of SBC with radiation modalities in the PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Science, and EMBASE databases. Outcomes assessed for each modality were as follows: OS, PFS, local control (LC), and complications. The random-effects model was adopted. A single-proportion analysis with 95% CI was used to measure the effects in single-arm analysis. For the comparative analysis, the OR with 95% CI was used to compare outcome treatment effects. Heterogeneity was assessed using I<sup>2</sup> statistics, and statistical significance was defined as p &lt; 0.05.</p>\nRESULTS\n<p>A total of 32 studies comprising 3663 patients, with 2322 patients who were treated with radiotherapeutic modalities, were included. Regarding 5-year OS findings in each modality study, the findings were as follows: in photon fractionated radiotherapy, an estimated rate of 77% (69%–84%, 568 patients); in conventional fractionated radiotherapy, 76% (65%–87%, 517 cases); in proton-based + carbon ion–based radiotherapy, 85% (82%–88%, 622 cases); and in a comparative analysis of proton-based and carbon ion–based therapy, there was an OR of 1.2 (95% CI 0.59–2.43, 306 cases). Regarding the 5-year PFS estimate, the rates were as follows: 35% (26%–45%, 95 cases) for photon fractionated therapy; 35% (25%–45%, 85 cases) for stereotactic radiotherapy; 77% (50%–100%, 180 cases) for proton-based and carbon ion–based radiotherapy; and 74% (45%–100%, 102 cases) for proton-based radiotherapy. Regarding LC in periods of 3 and 5 years after proton- and carbon ion–based therapy, the overall estimated rates were 84% (78%–90%, 326 cases) and 75% (65%–85%, 448 cases), respectively. For proton-based radiotherapy and carbon ion–based therapy, the 5-year LC rates were 76% (67%–86%, 259 cases) and 75% (59%–91%, 189 cases), respectively.</p>\nCONCLUSIONS\n<p>The analysis highlights the finding that particle-based modalities like proton beam radiotherapy and carbon ion radiotherapy are the most effective radiation therapies available for the treatment of SBC. Furthermore, it reinforces the idea that surgery followed by radiotherapy constitutes the standard treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":19187,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgical focus","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosurgical focus","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.2.focus2413","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

In the treatment of skull base chordoma (SBC) surgery is considered the mainstay approach, and gross-total resection has an established relationship with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). However, the tumor’s location often interferes with attempts at complete resection. In this case, surgery for maximal resection followed by high-dose radiotherapy has been demonstrated to be the standard treatment. In this context, various modalities are available, yet no consensus exists on the most effective. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of different radiotherapy modalities for SBC.

METHODS

Following PRISMA guidelines, the authors systematically searched for the treatment of SBC with radiation modalities in the PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Science, and EMBASE databases. Outcomes assessed for each modality were as follows: OS, PFS, local control (LC), and complications. The random-effects model was adopted. A single-proportion analysis with 95% CI was used to measure the effects in single-arm analysis. For the comparative analysis, the OR with 95% CI was used to compare outcome treatment effects. Heterogeneity was assessed using I2 statistics, and statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05.

RESULTS

A total of 32 studies comprising 3663 patients, with 2322 patients who were treated with radiotherapeutic modalities, were included. Regarding 5-year OS findings in each modality study, the findings were as follows: in photon fractionated radiotherapy, an estimated rate of 77% (69%–84%, 568 patients); in conventional fractionated radiotherapy, 76% (65%–87%, 517 cases); in proton-based + carbon ion–based radiotherapy, 85% (82%–88%, 622 cases); and in a comparative analysis of proton-based and carbon ion–based therapy, there was an OR of 1.2 (95% CI 0.59–2.43, 306 cases). Regarding the 5-year PFS estimate, the rates were as follows: 35% (26%–45%, 95 cases) for photon fractionated therapy; 35% (25%–45%, 85 cases) for stereotactic radiotherapy; 77% (50%–100%, 180 cases) for proton-based and carbon ion–based radiotherapy; and 74% (45%–100%, 102 cases) for proton-based radiotherapy. Regarding LC in periods of 3 and 5 years after proton- and carbon ion–based therapy, the overall estimated rates were 84% (78%–90%, 326 cases) and 75% (65%–85%, 448 cases), respectively. For proton-based radiotherapy and carbon ion–based therapy, the 5-year LC rates were 76% (67%–86%, 259 cases) and 75% (59%–91%, 189 cases), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The analysis highlights the finding that particle-based modalities like proton beam radiotherapy and carbon ion radiotherapy are the most effective radiation therapies available for the treatment of SBC. Furthermore, it reinforces the idea that surgery followed by radiotherapy constitutes the standard treatment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
优化颅底脊索瘤的放射治疗策略:治疗方式和疗效的综合荟萃分析与系统综述
目的 在治疗颅底脊索瘤(SBC)的过程中,手术被认为是主要的方法,大体全切除与无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)有确定的关系。然而,肿瘤的位置往往会影响完全切除的尝试。在这种情况下,手术最大限度切除肿瘤,然后进行大剂量放疗已被证明是标准的治疗方法。在这种情况下,有多种治疗方法可供选择,但对于最有效的治疗方法还没有达成共识。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在评估不同放疗模式治疗 SBC 的有效性和安全性。方法作者遵循 PRISMA 指南,在 PubMed、Cochrane、Web of Science 和 EMBASE 数据库中系统检索了用放疗模式治疗 SBC 的资料。每种模式的评估结果如下:OS、PFS、局部控制(LC)和并发症。采用随机效应模型。在单臂分析中,采用带有 95% CI 的单比例分析来衡量效果。在对比分析中,采用OR值与95% CI值来比较结果治疗效果。结果共纳入32项研究,3663名患者,其中2322名患者接受了放射治疗模式。关于每种放疗模式的 5 年 OS,结果如下:光子分割放疗的估计率为 77%(69%-84%,568 例患者);常规分割放疗的估计率为 76%(65%-87%,517 例患者);质子+碳离子放疗的估计率为 85%(82%-88%,622 例患者);质子和碳离子疗法的比较分析结果显示,OR 为 1.2(95% CI 0.59-2.43,306 例患者)。关于5年PFS的估计,比率如下光子分型疗法为35%(26%-45%,95例);立体定向放疗为35%(25%-45%,85例);质子和碳离子放疗为77%(50%-100%,180例);质子放疗为74%(45%-100%,102例)。关于质子和碳离子治疗后3年和5年的LC,总估计率分别为84%(78%-90%,326例)和75%(65%-85%,448例)。对于质子放疗和碳离子放疗,5 年 LC 率分别为 76%(67%-86%,259 例)和 75%(59%-91%,189 例)。此外,它还强化了先手术后放疗是标准治疗方法的观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neurosurgical focus
Neurosurgical focus CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-SURGERY
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
261
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Information not localized
期刊最新文献
3-T MR-guided focused ultrasound thalamotomy for tremor in patients with a cardiac pacemaker: case series and review of the literature. A review of sonodynamic therapy for brain tumors. A systematic review of focused ultrasound for psychiatric disorders: current applications, opportunities, and challenges. Brain targeting for focused ultrasound essential tremor ablation: proceedings from the 2023 Focused Ultrasound Foundation workshop. Focused ultrasound for the treatment of facet joint pain: a systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1