Pub Date : 2026-02-01DOI: 10.3171/2025.11.FOCUS25876
Jonathan P Miller, Jennifer Sweet, Thomas Kinfe, Shervin Rahimpour, Peter Konrad, Nader Pouratian
{"title":"Introduction. Restorative neurosurgery and machine interface.","authors":"Jonathan P Miller, Jennifer Sweet, Thomas Kinfe, Shervin Rahimpour, Peter Konrad, Nader Pouratian","doi":"10.3171/2025.11.FOCUS25876","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2025.11.FOCUS25876","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":19187,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgical focus","volume":"60 2","pages":"E2"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146100392","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01DOI: 10.3171/2025.11.FOCUS25916
Tyler R Johnson, Sarah Moralle, Ziling Luo, Dawn M Taylor
Objective: The long-term goal of this work is to develop a sensorimotor brain-machine interface (BMI) in which intended movements are decoded from the motor cortex and proprioceptive feedback is delivered via intracortical microstimulation of Brodmann's area 3a. A vital step toward this goal is to demonstrate in rhesus macaques a novel surgical approach for the precise and safe implantation of custom-length microelectrode arrays into area 3a at the bottom of the central sulcus.
Methods: Preoperative planning combined high-resolution 7-T MR and CT imaging to generate 3D models of the cortices of 2 subjects. These models were used to fabricate 3D-printed skull replicas and to define a stereotactic trajectory that provided the shortest perpendicular path to the base of the central sulcus, where Brodmann's area 3a resides. Custom variable-length microwire electrode arrays were designed to span this target region. The flexibility of the microwires precluded the standard impact-insertion approach used with stiffer electrodes. Therefore, a custom vacuum-powered microdrive holder that moved with the pulsating brain was developed to maintain electrode orientation and to allow slow, controlled insertion along the planned trajectory. After implantation, the craniotomy was closed, and a skull-mounted recording chamber was secured. Postoperative verification of array placement was performed using CT imaging and neural recordings.
Results: In both animals, imaging revealed that the base of the central sulcus was positioned anterior to its dorsal opening, making a precentral implant trajectory the shortest and most direct path to the bottom of the central sulcus. The integrated imaging and 3D modeling approach enabled accurate stereotactic placement of custom microelectrode arrays using the novel vacuum-assisted microdrive, as confirmed by postoperative CT imaging. Both surgical procedures were completed without complication, and isolatable neuronal spikes were recorded from multiple channels in each subject. In both animals, neural activity was modulated by passive movements of the arm.
Conclusions: Intracortical microelectrode implants for BMI applications have traditionally been limited to short (1.5-mm) electrodes targeting cortical sites exposed on the brain surface. The surgical methodology described here enables safe and accurate implantation of custom-length arrays into deep sulcal targets such as Brodmann's area 3a. By expanding access to previously inaccessible cortical regions, this approach broadens the potential neural information available for future BMI applications.
{"title":"Implanting microelectrode arrays in the bottom of the central sulcus targeting somatosensory area 3a for restoration of proprioception.","authors":"Tyler R Johnson, Sarah Moralle, Ziling Luo, Dawn M Taylor","doi":"10.3171/2025.11.FOCUS25916","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2025.11.FOCUS25916","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The long-term goal of this work is to develop a sensorimotor brain-machine interface (BMI) in which intended movements are decoded from the motor cortex and proprioceptive feedback is delivered via intracortical microstimulation of Brodmann's area 3a. A vital step toward this goal is to demonstrate in rhesus macaques a novel surgical approach for the precise and safe implantation of custom-length microelectrode arrays into area 3a at the bottom of the central sulcus.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Preoperative planning combined high-resolution 7-T MR and CT imaging to generate 3D models of the cortices of 2 subjects. These models were used to fabricate 3D-printed skull replicas and to define a stereotactic trajectory that provided the shortest perpendicular path to the base of the central sulcus, where Brodmann's area 3a resides. Custom variable-length microwire electrode arrays were designed to span this target region. The flexibility of the microwires precluded the standard impact-insertion approach used with stiffer electrodes. Therefore, a custom vacuum-powered microdrive holder that moved with the pulsating brain was developed to maintain electrode orientation and to allow slow, controlled insertion along the planned trajectory. After implantation, the craniotomy was closed, and a skull-mounted recording chamber was secured. Postoperative verification of array placement was performed using CT imaging and neural recordings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In both animals, imaging revealed that the base of the central sulcus was positioned anterior to its dorsal opening, making a precentral implant trajectory the shortest and most direct path to the bottom of the central sulcus. The integrated imaging and 3D modeling approach enabled accurate stereotactic placement of custom microelectrode arrays using the novel vacuum-assisted microdrive, as confirmed by postoperative CT imaging. Both surgical procedures were completed without complication, and isolatable neuronal spikes were recorded from multiple channels in each subject. In both animals, neural activity was modulated by passive movements of the arm.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Intracortical microelectrode implants for BMI applications have traditionally been limited to short (1.5-mm) electrodes targeting cortical sites exposed on the brain surface. The surgical methodology described here enables safe and accurate implantation of custom-length arrays into deep sulcal targets such as Brodmann's area 3a. By expanding access to previously inaccessible cortical regions, this approach broadens the potential neural information available for future BMI applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":19187,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgical focus","volume":"60 2","pages":"E8"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146100381","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01DOI: 10.3171/2025.11.FOCUS25908
Kurt R Lehner, Shiyu Luo, Becca Greene, Miguel Angrick, Daniel Candrea, Khalil S Husari, Katrina Barth, Jackie Dister, Ramin Anushiravani, Joshua S Miller, Elton Ho, Jordina Rincon-Torroella, Benjamin Rapoport, Youssef Comair, Nathan E Crone
Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of using the Layer 7 Cortical Interface, a high-density micro-electrocorticography (μECoG) array, for intraoperative neural recordings and real-time brain-computer interface (BCI) applications, including speech decoding and cursor control.
Methods: Four patients (age range 23-43 years) who underwent awake craniotomy for tumor resection near the eloquent cortex were enrolled. The Layer 7 µECoG device (1024 channels, approximately 1.5-cm2 coverage) was placed on the motor cortex following standard cortical mapping. Intraoperative tasks included a joystick-controlled center-out movement paradigm (n = 3) and an auditory-cued speech repetition task (n = 1). Neural data were recorded at 20 kHz, preprocessed, and used to train decoders intraoperatively. A transformer-based model was applied for real-time speech synthesis and a convolutional neural network was trained for speech classification, while a convolutional recurrent neural network was trained to classify 2D cursor direction.
Results: All 4 patients tolerated the procedure without device-related adverse events. The mean electrode impedances across 6 arrays (6144 channels) ranged from 1.21 to 1.99 MΩ, with 954-990 channels per array retained for analysis. In the speech task, a 4-word classification model achieved 77.5% accuracy, and a real-time synthesis model was able to distinguish speech and silence during approximately 20 minutes of data recording in the operating room. In the motor task, a 4-direction classification model achieved 78%-84% accuracy. Recordings remained stable during tumor resection.
Conclusions: The Layer 7 Cortical Interface device enabled high-resolution nonpenetrating cortical recordings that supported real-time speech classification and cursor control within the limited timeframe of an intraoperative session. These findings highlight the potential clinical applications of high-density µECoG for functional mapping, diagnostic assessment, and future chronic BCI systems for patients with motor and communication impairments.
{"title":"Initial experience with the precision neuroscience Layer 7 micro-electrocorticography interface for real-time intraoperative neural decoding.","authors":"Kurt R Lehner, Shiyu Luo, Becca Greene, Miguel Angrick, Daniel Candrea, Khalil S Husari, Katrina Barth, Jackie Dister, Ramin Anushiravani, Joshua S Miller, Elton Ho, Jordina Rincon-Torroella, Benjamin Rapoport, Youssef Comair, Nathan E Crone","doi":"10.3171/2025.11.FOCUS25908","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2025.11.FOCUS25908","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of using the Layer 7 Cortical Interface, a high-density micro-electrocorticography (μECoG) array, for intraoperative neural recordings and real-time brain-computer interface (BCI) applications, including speech decoding and cursor control.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Four patients (age range 23-43 years) who underwent awake craniotomy for tumor resection near the eloquent cortex were enrolled. The Layer 7 µECoG device (1024 channels, approximately 1.5-cm2 coverage) was placed on the motor cortex following standard cortical mapping. Intraoperative tasks included a joystick-controlled center-out movement paradigm (n = 3) and an auditory-cued speech repetition task (n = 1). Neural data were recorded at 20 kHz, preprocessed, and used to train decoders intraoperatively. A transformer-based model was applied for real-time speech synthesis and a convolutional neural network was trained for speech classification, while a convolutional recurrent neural network was trained to classify 2D cursor direction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All 4 patients tolerated the procedure without device-related adverse events. The mean electrode impedances across 6 arrays (6144 channels) ranged from 1.21 to 1.99 MΩ, with 954-990 channels per array retained for analysis. In the speech task, a 4-word classification model achieved 77.5% accuracy, and a real-time synthesis model was able to distinguish speech and silence during approximately 20 minutes of data recording in the operating room. In the motor task, a 4-direction classification model achieved 78%-84% accuracy. Recordings remained stable during tumor resection.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Layer 7 Cortical Interface device enabled high-resolution nonpenetrating cortical recordings that supported real-time speech classification and cursor control within the limited timeframe of an intraoperative session. These findings highlight the potential clinical applications of high-density µECoG for functional mapping, diagnostic assessment, and future chronic BCI systems for patients with motor and communication impairments.</p>","PeriodicalId":19187,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgical focus","volume":"60 2","pages":"E3"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146100358","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Editorial. Foundations of a focused vision: Martin H. Weiss, MD, and the origins of Neurosurgical Focus.","authors":"Gabriel Zada, William T Couldwell","doi":"10.3171/2026.1.FOCUS264","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2026.1.FOCUS264","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":19187,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgical focus","volume":"60 2","pages":"E1"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146099884","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01DOI: 10.3171/2025.11.FOCUS25911
Vikas N Vattipally, Patrick Kramer, Katholiki Troumouchi, Shuhei Shiino, Nada Abouelseoud, Kaustubh Joshi, Risheng Xu, Nicholas Theodore, Henry Brem, Chetan Bettegowda, Lauren L Jantzie, Shenandoah Robinson, Tej D Azad, Annie Kathuria
Acute and chronic CNS pathologies that result in tissue loss remain among the most intractable problems in neurosurgery, with current treatments focused on stabilization and neuroprotection rather than structural repair. Neural interfaces such as recording, stimulating, or replacing neural activity have demonstrated value in restoring function via prostheses and brain-computer interfaces, yet these approaches are constrained by electrode design, bandwidth, and limited biological integration. Engineered neuroglial organoids offer a complementary, biologically based interface strategy. Derived from pluripotent stem cells, neuroglial organoids arrive as 3D constructs containing neurons and glia in intrinsic architecture, capable of vascularization, synaptic connectivity, and integration with host tissue. Building on dissociated stem cell suspensions, organoids act not only as reservoirs of cells but also as living neural interfaces, receiving inputs from host circuits and generating functional outputs. Preclinical studies have demonstrated that transplanted organoids can couple to host sensory pathways, respond to stimulation, and support recovery of motor and cognitive functions. Moreover, emerging work coupling organoid grafts to brain-computer interfaces highlights the potential for closed-loop biological electronic systems, in which engineered devices provide precise recording and stimulation while organoids contribute adaptive, active biological circuits. This combination allows real-time bidirectional communication, allowing the graft to be both monitored and adapted to structurally and functionally integrate into host tissue. In this review, the authors examine neuroglial organoid transplantation through the lens of neural interfacing. They outline lessons from non-CNS organoid transplantation, summarize neurotrauma studies where grafts engage host circuits, and highlight opportunities to integrate organoids with electrodes, stimulation paradigms, and computational models. They also discuss challenges, namely vascularization, immune tolerance, surgical delivery, and manufacturing standards, that parallel those in neural device translation. For neurosurgeons, the appeal of neuroglial organoids lies not only in tissue replacement but in establishing a new class of biological neural interfaces, extending the reach of restorative neurosurgery. By merging living constructs with engineered devices, organoid-based strategies may enable hybrid restorative systems that restore function after neurological injury and disease.
{"title":"Engineered neuroglial organoids as living neural interfaces for restorative neurosurgery.","authors":"Vikas N Vattipally, Patrick Kramer, Katholiki Troumouchi, Shuhei Shiino, Nada Abouelseoud, Kaustubh Joshi, Risheng Xu, Nicholas Theodore, Henry Brem, Chetan Bettegowda, Lauren L Jantzie, Shenandoah Robinson, Tej D Azad, Annie Kathuria","doi":"10.3171/2025.11.FOCUS25911","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2025.11.FOCUS25911","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Acute and chronic CNS pathologies that result in tissue loss remain among the most intractable problems in neurosurgery, with current treatments focused on stabilization and neuroprotection rather than structural repair. Neural interfaces such as recording, stimulating, or replacing neural activity have demonstrated value in restoring function via prostheses and brain-computer interfaces, yet these approaches are constrained by electrode design, bandwidth, and limited biological integration. Engineered neuroglial organoids offer a complementary, biologically based interface strategy. Derived from pluripotent stem cells, neuroglial organoids arrive as 3D constructs containing neurons and glia in intrinsic architecture, capable of vascularization, synaptic connectivity, and integration with host tissue. Building on dissociated stem cell suspensions, organoids act not only as reservoirs of cells but also as living neural interfaces, receiving inputs from host circuits and generating functional outputs. Preclinical studies have demonstrated that transplanted organoids can couple to host sensory pathways, respond to stimulation, and support recovery of motor and cognitive functions. Moreover, emerging work coupling organoid grafts to brain-computer interfaces highlights the potential for closed-loop biological electronic systems, in which engineered devices provide precise recording and stimulation while organoids contribute adaptive, active biological circuits. This combination allows real-time bidirectional communication, allowing the graft to be both monitored and adapted to structurally and functionally integrate into host tissue. In this review, the authors examine neuroglial organoid transplantation through the lens of neural interfacing. They outline lessons from non-CNS organoid transplantation, summarize neurotrauma studies where grafts engage host circuits, and highlight opportunities to integrate organoids with electrodes, stimulation paradigms, and computational models. They also discuss challenges, namely vascularization, immune tolerance, surgical delivery, and manufacturing standards, that parallel those in neural device translation. For neurosurgeons, the appeal of neuroglial organoids lies not only in tissue replacement but in establishing a new class of biological neural interfaces, extending the reach of restorative neurosurgery. By merging living constructs with engineered devices, organoid-based strategies may enable hybrid restorative systems that restore function after neurological injury and disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":19187,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgical focus","volume":"60 2","pages":"E5"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146099915","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01DOI: 10.3171/2025.11.FOCUS251042
Jonathan P Miller
{"title":"Editorial. Engineered neuroglial organoids: the next neurosurgical revolution?","authors":"Jonathan P Miller","doi":"10.3171/2025.11.FOCUS251042","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2025.11.FOCUS251042","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":19187,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgical focus","volume":"60 2","pages":"E6"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146100524","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01DOI: 10.3171/2025.8.FOCUS25807
Yanglin Tu, Zhenzhi Tian, Weifei Wu
{"title":"Letter to the Editor. A complementary perspective on synthesizing spinal CT from biplanar radiographs.","authors":"Yanglin Tu, Zhenzhi Tian, Weifei Wu","doi":"10.3171/2025.8.FOCUS25807","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2025.8.FOCUS25807","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":19187,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgical focus","volume":"60 2","pages":"E9"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146100343","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01DOI: 10.3171/2025.11.FOCUS25913
Ali Mortezaei, Nadir Al-Saidi, Khaled M Taghlabi, Amna Hussein, Hana Hallak, Nader Pouratian, Amir H Faraji
Objective: Stroke is a leading cause of long-term disability, with conventional rehabilitation often failing to achieve substantial motor recovery, particularly in patients with severe paresis or in chronic stages. Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) offer a novel rehabilitation approach by translating neural signals into real-time external feedback. The authors performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate the efficacy and safety of noninvasive BCIs for poststroke motor rehabilitation.
Methods: A systematic literature review was performed based on the PRISMA guidelines using 3 databases. Eligible RCTs enrolled stroke patients receiving noninvasive BCI-assisted motor rehabilitation compared with conventional therapies. The primary outcome was the Fugl-Meyer Assessment for Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) improvement. Secondary outcomes included the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT), Motor Activity Log (MAL), Modified Barthel Index (MBI), and Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS). Effect sizes were pooled using random-effects models and expressed as mean differences (MDs), standardized MDs (SMDs), or odds ratios, each with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
Results: Thirty-two RCTs comprising 1187 patients were included with no heterogeneity or significant imbalances in baseline characteristics across groups. A BCI was significantly superior in FMA-UE score improvement compared with controls (MD 3.85, 95% CI 2.84-4.86; p < 0.01), with benefits sustained at follow-up. Within-group analyses revealed greater improvement in the BCI arm from follow-up to baseline (MD 8.18, 95% CI 5.77-10.60; p < 0.01). A BCI was also associated with higher ARAT (MD 7.18, 95% CI 2.4-12.0; p < 0.01) and MAL (SMD 0.59, 95% CI 0.34-0.85; p < 0.01) scores, although between-group differences for these endpoints were not statistically significant. For the MBI, a subgroup analysis did not demonstrate significant differences, but a sensitivity analysis revealed a significant improvement in the BCI group (p = 0.042). There were no significant differences in the within- and between-group analyses of the MAS. A subgroup analysis suggested a synergistic benefit with the BCI combined with neuromuscular electrical stimulation. Adverse events were infrequent and generally mild; 2 withdrawals in the BCI group were reported due to seizure and electrode allergy. Notably, all heterogeneity was successfully resolved through sensitivity analyses, supporting the robustness of the findings.
Conclusions: Noninvasive BCI-assisted rehabilitation is a safe and effective adjunct to conventional therapy, enhancing motor recovery after stroke. While all included RCTs evaluated noninvasive systems, the potential value and efficacy of invasive and minimally invasive BCIs may require further consideration.
目的:脑卒中是导致长期残疾的主要原因,常规的康复治疗往往无法实现实质性的运动恢复,特别是在严重的瘫瘫或慢性阶段的患者中。脑机接口(bci)通过将神经信号转化为实时的外部反馈,提供了一种新的康复方法。作者对随机对照试验(rct)进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析,以评估无创脑机接口用于脑卒中后运动康复的有效性和安全性。方法:根据PRISMA指南对3个数据库进行系统的文献回顾。符合条件的随机对照试验纳入了接受无创脑机接口辅助运动康复的脑卒中患者,与常规疗法进行比较。主要结果为Fugl-Meyer上肢改善评估(FMA-UE)。次要结果包括动作研究臂测试(ARAT)、运动活动日志(MAL)、改良Barthel指数(MBI)和改良Ashworth量表(MAS)。使用随机效应模型汇总效应大小,并以平均差异(MDs)、标准化MDs (SMDs)或优势比表示,每个都有相应的95%置信区间(ci)。结果:32项随机对照试验纳入1187例患者,各组基线特征无异质性或显著不平衡。与对照组相比,BCI组在FMA-UE评分改善方面显著优于对照组(MD 3.85, 95% CI 2.84-4.86; p < 0.01),且在随访中获益持续。组内分析显示,BCI组从随访到基线有较大改善(MD 8.18, 95% CI 5.77-10.60; p < 0.01)。BCI还与较高的ARAT (MD为7.18,95% CI为2.4-12.0,p < 0.01)和MAL (SMD为0.59,95% CI为0.34-0.85,p < 0.01)评分相关,尽管这些终点的组间差异无统计学意义。对于MBI,亚组分析未显示显着差异,但敏感性分析显示BCI组有显着改善(p = 0.042)。在MAS的组内和组间分析中没有显著差异。亚组分析表明脑机接口联合神经肌肉电刺激具有协同效益。不良事件很少发生,一般轻微;脑机接口组有2例因癫痫发作和电极过敏而停药。值得注意的是,所有异质性都通过敏感性分析成功解决,支持研究结果的稳健性。结论:无创脑机接口辅助康复是一种安全有效的常规治疗辅助手段,可增强脑卒中后运动功能的恢复。虽然所有纳入的随机对照试验都评估了非侵入性系统,但侵入性和微创脑机接口的潜在价值和疗效可能需要进一步考虑。
{"title":"Brain-computer interfaces in poststroke rehabilitation: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.","authors":"Ali Mortezaei, Nadir Al-Saidi, Khaled M Taghlabi, Amna Hussein, Hana Hallak, Nader Pouratian, Amir H Faraji","doi":"10.3171/2025.11.FOCUS25913","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2025.11.FOCUS25913","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Stroke is a leading cause of long-term disability, with conventional rehabilitation often failing to achieve substantial motor recovery, particularly in patients with severe paresis or in chronic stages. Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) offer a novel rehabilitation approach by translating neural signals into real-time external feedback. The authors performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate the efficacy and safety of noninvasive BCIs for poststroke motor rehabilitation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature review was performed based on the PRISMA guidelines using 3 databases. Eligible RCTs enrolled stroke patients receiving noninvasive BCI-assisted motor rehabilitation compared with conventional therapies. The primary outcome was the Fugl-Meyer Assessment for Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) improvement. Secondary outcomes included the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT), Motor Activity Log (MAL), Modified Barthel Index (MBI), and Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS). Effect sizes were pooled using random-effects models and expressed as mean differences (MDs), standardized MDs (SMDs), or odds ratios, each with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-two RCTs comprising 1187 patients were included with no heterogeneity or significant imbalances in baseline characteristics across groups. A BCI was significantly superior in FMA-UE score improvement compared with controls (MD 3.85, 95% CI 2.84-4.86; p < 0.01), with benefits sustained at follow-up. Within-group analyses revealed greater improvement in the BCI arm from follow-up to baseline (MD 8.18, 95% CI 5.77-10.60; p < 0.01). A BCI was also associated with higher ARAT (MD 7.18, 95% CI 2.4-12.0; p < 0.01) and MAL (SMD 0.59, 95% CI 0.34-0.85; p < 0.01) scores, although between-group differences for these endpoints were not statistically significant. For the MBI, a subgroup analysis did not demonstrate significant differences, but a sensitivity analysis revealed a significant improvement in the BCI group (p = 0.042). There were no significant differences in the within- and between-group analyses of the MAS. A subgroup analysis suggested a synergistic benefit with the BCI combined with neuromuscular electrical stimulation. Adverse events were infrequent and generally mild; 2 withdrawals in the BCI group were reported due to seizure and electrode allergy. Notably, all heterogeneity was successfully resolved through sensitivity analyses, supporting the robustness of the findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Noninvasive BCI-assisted rehabilitation is a safe and effective adjunct to conventional therapy, enhancing motor recovery after stroke. While all included RCTs evaluated noninvasive systems, the potential value and efficacy of invasive and minimally invasive BCIs may require further consideration.</p>","PeriodicalId":19187,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgical focus","volume":"60 2","pages":"E7"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146100561","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01DOI: 10.3171/2025.11.FOCUS251041
Ahmad Alhourani, Nader Pouratian
{"title":"Editorial. Defining value and function in miniaturized cortical arrays for human brain-computer interface applications.","authors":"Ahmad Alhourani, Nader Pouratian","doi":"10.3171/2025.11.FOCUS251041","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2025.11.FOCUS251041","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":19187,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgical focus","volume":"60 2","pages":"E4"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146100547","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}