Optimizing Communication on HPV Vaccination to Parents of 11- to 14-Year-Old Adolescents in France: A Discrete Choice Experiment

Sandra Chyderiotis, Jonathan Sicsic, Amandine Gagneux-Brunon, Jocelyn Raude, Anne-Sophie Barret, Sébastien Bruel, Aurélie Gauchet, Anne-Sophie Le Duc Banaszuk, Morgane Michel, Bruno Giraudeau, Nathalie Thilly, Judith E. Mueller
{"title":"Optimizing Communication on HPV Vaccination to Parents of 11- to 14-Year-Old Adolescents in France: A Discrete Choice Experiment","authors":"Sandra Chyderiotis, Jonathan Sicsic, Amandine Gagneux-Brunon, Jocelyn Raude, Anne-Sophie Barret, Sébastien Bruel, Aurélie Gauchet, Anne-Sophie Le Duc Banaszuk, Morgane Michel, Bruno Giraudeau, Nathalie Thilly, Judith E. Mueller","doi":"10.1007/s40271-024-00687-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background</h3><p>With the aim to optimize communication during HPV vaccination campaigns in France, we elicited parental preferences around HPV vaccination.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>We conducted a single-profile discrete choice experiment (DCE) among parents of 11- to 14-year-old middle-school pupils, who completed an anonymous, self-administered, internet-based questionnaire during 2020–2021. The DCE comprised five attributes (vaccine-preventable disease, justification of optimal age, information on safety, indirect protection and coverage) of vaccination against an unnamed disease that were presented to respondents in ten choice tasks, or scenarios. We use fixed effect logit models to estimate attribute weights on theoretical vaccine acceptance, and random effect linear regression to estimate attribute coefficients on vaccine eagerness (decision and decision certainty). We estimated marginal effects of attributes on expected vaccine acceptance.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Vaccination scenarios were accepted by 55.6–89.2% of the 1291 participants. The largest marginal effects on expected vaccine acceptance in the full sample arose from prevention of cancer versus genital warts (+ 11.3 percentage points); from a “severe side effect suspicion that was not scientifically confirmed” versus a statement about “more benefits than risks” (+ 8.9 percentage points), and information on 80% vaccine coverage in neighbouring countries versus on “insufficient coverage” (+ 4.2 percentage points). Explaining the early age of vaccination by sexual debut had a strong negative impact among French monolingual parents with lower education level (vs age-independent, OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.27–0.86), but not other socio-economic groups. After removing low-quality responses (unvaried certainty and short questionnaire completion), among serial non-demanders with children not vaccinated against HPV, only disease elimination impacted vaccine eagerness positively (coefficient 0.54, 0.06–1.02).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Discussion</h3><p>Using DCEs to elicit parents’ preferences around communication messages, notably on cancer prevention, vaccine coverage and information about vaccine safety, could help to optimize HPV vaccination promotion efforts.</p>","PeriodicalId":501651,"journal":{"name":"The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research","volume":"88 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40271-024-00687-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

With the aim to optimize communication during HPV vaccination campaigns in France, we elicited parental preferences around HPV vaccination.

Methods

We conducted a single-profile discrete choice experiment (DCE) among parents of 11- to 14-year-old middle-school pupils, who completed an anonymous, self-administered, internet-based questionnaire during 2020–2021. The DCE comprised five attributes (vaccine-preventable disease, justification of optimal age, information on safety, indirect protection and coverage) of vaccination against an unnamed disease that were presented to respondents in ten choice tasks, or scenarios. We use fixed effect logit models to estimate attribute weights on theoretical vaccine acceptance, and random effect linear regression to estimate attribute coefficients on vaccine eagerness (decision and decision certainty). We estimated marginal effects of attributes on expected vaccine acceptance.

Results

Vaccination scenarios were accepted by 55.6–89.2% of the 1291 participants. The largest marginal effects on expected vaccine acceptance in the full sample arose from prevention of cancer versus genital warts (+ 11.3 percentage points); from a “severe side effect suspicion that was not scientifically confirmed” versus a statement about “more benefits than risks” (+ 8.9 percentage points), and information on 80% vaccine coverage in neighbouring countries versus on “insufficient coverage” (+ 4.2 percentage points). Explaining the early age of vaccination by sexual debut had a strong negative impact among French monolingual parents with lower education level (vs age-independent, OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.27–0.86), but not other socio-economic groups. After removing low-quality responses (unvaried certainty and short questionnaire completion), among serial non-demanders with children not vaccinated against HPV, only disease elimination impacted vaccine eagerness positively (coefficient 0.54, 0.06–1.02).

Discussion

Using DCEs to elicit parents’ preferences around communication messages, notably on cancer prevention, vaccine coverage and information about vaccine safety, could help to optimize HPV vaccination promotion efforts.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
优化向法国 11 至 14 岁青少年家长宣传 HPV 疫苗接种:离散选择实验
背景为了优化法国HPV疫苗接种活动中的沟通,我们调查了家长对HPV疫苗接种的偏好。方法在2020-2021年期间,我们对11至14岁中学生的家长进行了一次单独的离散选择实验(DCE)。DCE 包括接种疫苗预防一种未命名疾病的五个属性(疫苗可预防的疾病、最佳年龄的合理性、安全性信息、间接保护和覆盖率),这些属性在十个选择任务或情景中呈现给受访者。我们使用固定效应 logit 模型估算理论疫苗接受度的属性权重,并使用随机效应线性回归估算疫苗接种渴望度(决策和决策确定性)的属性系数。我们估算了属性对预期疫苗接受度的边际效应。结果1291 名参与者中有 55.6-89.2% 接受了疫苗接种方案。在全样本中,预防癌症与预防生殖器疣(+ 11.3 个百分点)、"怀疑有未经科学证实的严重副作用 "与 "利大于弊"(+ 8.9 个百分点)以及邻国 80% 的疫苗覆盖率与 "覆盖率不足"(+ 4.2 个百分点)对预期疫苗接受度的边际效应最大。以初次性行为来解释过早接种疫苗的年龄对教育水平较低的法语单语父母有很大的负面影响(与年龄无关,OR 0.48,95% CI 0.27-0.86),但对其他社会经济群体没有影响。在剔除低质量的回答(确定性不一和问卷完成时间短)后,在子女未接种过 HPV 疫苗的连续非需求者中,只有疾病消除对疫苗接种意愿有积极影响(系数为 0.54,0.06-1.02)。讨论利用 DCEs 来了解家长对传播信息的偏好,尤其是对癌症预防、疫苗覆盖率和疫苗安全性信息的偏好,有助于优化 HPV 疫苗接种的推广工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Exploring How Values of Colorectal Cancer Patients and their Caregivers Influence Treatment Decision-Making Measuring and Demonstrating the Value of Patient Engagement Across the Medicines Lifecycle: A Patient Engagement Impact Measurement Framework Stated Preferences of At-Risk Populations for the Treatment of Osteoporosis: A Systematic Review Optimizing Communication on HPV Vaccination to Parents of 11- to 14-Year-Old Adolescents in France: A Discrete Choice Experiment An Overview of Data Collection in Health Preference Research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1