Cross-Cutting mHealth Behavior Change Techniques to Support Treatment Adherence and Self-Management of Complex Medical Conditions: Systematic Review

IF 5.4 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES JMIR mHealth and uHealth Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI:10.2196/49024
Cyd K Eaton, Emma McWilliams, Dana Yablon, Irem Kesim, Renee Ge, Karissa Mirus, Takeera Sconiers, Alfred Donkoh, Melanie Lawrence, Cynthia George, Mary Leigh Morrison, Emily Muther, Gabriela R Oates, Meghana Sathe, Gregory S Sawicki, Carolyn Snell, Kristin Riekert
{"title":"Cross-Cutting mHealth Behavior Change Techniques to Support Treatment Adherence and Self-Management of Complex Medical Conditions: Systematic Review","authors":"Cyd K Eaton, Emma McWilliams, Dana Yablon, Irem Kesim, Renee Ge, Karissa Mirus, Takeera Sconiers, Alfred Donkoh, Melanie Lawrence, Cynthia George, Mary Leigh Morrison, Emily Muther, Gabriela R Oates, Meghana Sathe, Gregory S Sawicki, Carolyn Snell, Kristin Riekert","doi":"10.2196/49024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Mobile health (mHealth) interventions have immense potential to support disease self-management for people with complex medical conditions following treatment regimens that involve taking medicine and other self-management activities. However, there is no consensus on what discrete behavior change techniques should be used in an effective adherence and self-management promoting mHealth solution for any chronic illness. Reviewing the extant literature to identify effective, cross-cutting behavior change techniques in mHealth interventions for adherence and self-management promotion could help accelerate the development, evaluation, and dissemination of behavior change interventions with potential generalizability across complex medical conditions. Objective: To identify cross-cutting mHealth-based behavior change techniques to incorporate in effective mHealth adherence and self-management interventions for people with complex medical conditions by systematically reviewing the literature across chronic medical conditions with similar adherence and self-management demands. Methods: A registered systematic review was conducted to identify published evaluations of mHealth adherence and self-management interventions for chronic medical conditions with complex adherence and self-management demands. Methodological characteristics and behavior change techniques in each study were extracted using a standard data collection form. Results: 122 studies were reviewed; the majority involved people with type 2 diabetes (n=28/122, 23%), asthma (n=27/122, 22%), and type 1 diabetes (n=19/122, 16%). mHealth interventions rated as having a positive outcome on adherence/self-management used more behavior change techniques (M=4.95, SD=2.56) compared to interventions with no impact on outcomes (M=3.57, SD=1.95) or used >1 outcome measure or analytic approach (M=3.90, SD=1.93; P=.02). The following behavior change techniques were associated with positive outcomes: Self-monitoring outcomes of behavior (39/59, 66%), feedback on outcomes of behavior (34/59, 58%), self-monitoring of behavior (34/59, 58%), feedback on behavior (29/59, 49%), credible source (24/59, 41%), and goal setting (behavior; 14/59, 24%). In adult-only samples, prompts/cues were associated with positive outcomes (34/45, 76%). In adolescent/young adult samples, information about health consequences (1/4, 25%), problem-solving (1/4, 25%), and material reward-behavior (2/4, 50%) were associated with positive outcomes. In interventions explicitly targeting taking medicine, prompts/cues (25/33, 76%) and credible source (13/33, 39%) were associated with positive outcomes. In interventions focused on self-management and other adherence targets, instruction on how to perform the behavior (8/26, 31%), goal setting (behavior; 8/26, 31%)), and action planning (5/26, 19%) were associated with positive outcomes. Conclusions: To support adherence and self-management in people with complex medical conditions, mHealth tools should purposefully incorporate effective and developmentally appropriate behavior change techniques. A cross-cutting approach to behavior change technique selection could accelerate the development of much needed mHealth interventions for target populations, though mHealth intervention developers should continue to consider the unique needs of the target population when designing these tools. Clinical Trial: PROSPERO International prospective register of systematic reviews CRD42021224407; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=224407","PeriodicalId":14756,"journal":{"name":"JMIR mHealth and uHealth","volume":"103 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR mHealth and uHealth","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/49024","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Mobile health (mHealth) interventions have immense potential to support disease self-management for people with complex medical conditions following treatment regimens that involve taking medicine and other self-management activities. However, there is no consensus on what discrete behavior change techniques should be used in an effective adherence and self-management promoting mHealth solution for any chronic illness. Reviewing the extant literature to identify effective, cross-cutting behavior change techniques in mHealth interventions for adherence and self-management promotion could help accelerate the development, evaluation, and dissemination of behavior change interventions with potential generalizability across complex medical conditions. Objective: To identify cross-cutting mHealth-based behavior change techniques to incorporate in effective mHealth adherence and self-management interventions for people with complex medical conditions by systematically reviewing the literature across chronic medical conditions with similar adherence and self-management demands. Methods: A registered systematic review was conducted to identify published evaluations of mHealth adherence and self-management interventions for chronic medical conditions with complex adherence and self-management demands. Methodological characteristics and behavior change techniques in each study were extracted using a standard data collection form. Results: 122 studies were reviewed; the majority involved people with type 2 diabetes (n=28/122, 23%), asthma (n=27/122, 22%), and type 1 diabetes (n=19/122, 16%). mHealth interventions rated as having a positive outcome on adherence/self-management used more behavior change techniques (M=4.95, SD=2.56) compared to interventions with no impact on outcomes (M=3.57, SD=1.95) or used >1 outcome measure or analytic approach (M=3.90, SD=1.93; P=.02). The following behavior change techniques were associated with positive outcomes: Self-monitoring outcomes of behavior (39/59, 66%), feedback on outcomes of behavior (34/59, 58%), self-monitoring of behavior (34/59, 58%), feedback on behavior (29/59, 49%), credible source (24/59, 41%), and goal setting (behavior; 14/59, 24%). In adult-only samples, prompts/cues were associated with positive outcomes (34/45, 76%). In adolescent/young adult samples, information about health consequences (1/4, 25%), problem-solving (1/4, 25%), and material reward-behavior (2/4, 50%) were associated with positive outcomes. In interventions explicitly targeting taking medicine, prompts/cues (25/33, 76%) and credible source (13/33, 39%) were associated with positive outcomes. In interventions focused on self-management and other adherence targets, instruction on how to perform the behavior (8/26, 31%), goal setting (behavior; 8/26, 31%)), and action planning (5/26, 19%) were associated with positive outcomes. Conclusions: To support adherence and self-management in people with complex medical conditions, mHealth tools should purposefully incorporate effective and developmentally appropriate behavior change techniques. A cross-cutting approach to behavior change technique selection could accelerate the development of much needed mHealth interventions for target populations, though mHealth intervention developers should continue to consider the unique needs of the target population when designing these tools. Clinical Trial: PROSPERO International prospective register of systematic reviews CRD42021224407; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=224407
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
交叉移动医疗行为改变技术,支持复杂病情的治疗依从性和自我管理:系统回顾
背景:移动医疗(mHealth)干预措施在支持患有复杂疾病的人进行疾病自我管理方面有着巨大的潜力,这些人需要按照治疗方案服药并开展其他自我管理活动。然而,在针对任何慢性疾病的有效坚持治疗和自我管理促进移动医疗解决方案中,应使用哪些离散的行为改变技术还没有达成共识。回顾现有文献,找出移动医疗干预中有效的、贯穿各领域的行为改变技术,以促进坚持服药和自我管理,有助于加快开发、评估和推广行为改变干预,并在复杂的医疗条件下具有潜在的普适性。目的通过系统回顾具有类似坚持和自我管理需求的慢性病文献,确定基于移动医疗的跨领域行为改变技术,以纳入针对复杂病情患者的有效移动医疗坚持和自我管理干预中。方法:我们进行了一项注册系统综述,以确定已发表的针对具有复杂依从性和自我管理需求的慢性病的移动医疗依从性和自我管理干预的评估。使用标准数据收集表提取每项研究的方法学特征和行为改变技术。结果回顾了 122 项研究,其中大多数涉及 2 型糖尿病患者(n=28/122,23%)、哮喘患者(n=27/122,22%)和 1 型糖尿病患者(n=19/122,16%)。95,SD=2.56),而对结果无影响的干预措施(M=3.57,SD=1.95)或使用>1 种结果测量或分析方法(M=3.90,SD=1.93;P=.02)。以下行为改变技术与积极结果相关:自我监测行为结果(39/59,66%)、行为结果反馈(34/59,58%)、自我监测行为(34/59,58%)、行为反馈(29/59,49%)、可信来源(24/59,41%)和目标设定(行为;14/59,24%)。在成人样本中,提示/提示与积极结果相关(34/45,76%)。在青少年样本中,有关健康后果的信息(1/4,25%)、解决问题(1/4,25%)和物质奖励行为(2/4,50%)与积极结果相关。在明确针对服药的干预中,提示/线索(25/33,76%)和可信来源(13/33,39%)与积极结果相关。在侧重于自我管理和其他坚持目标的干预中,指导如何实施行为(8/26,31%)、目标设定(行为;8/26,31%)和行动规划(5/26,19%)与积极结果相关。结论为了支持病情复杂的患者坚持治疗和自我管理,移动医疗工具应该有目的地纳入有效且适合发展的行为改变技术。选择行为改变技术的跨领域方法可以加快为目标人群开发急需的移动医疗干预措施,但移动医疗干预措施开发人员在设计这些工具时应继续考虑目标人群的独特需求。临床试验:PROSPERO 国际前瞻性系统综述注册中心 CRD42021224407; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=224407
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JMIR mHealth and uHealth
JMIR mHealth and uHealth Medicine-Health Informatics
CiteScore
12.60
自引率
4.00%
发文量
159
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: JMIR mHealth and uHealth (JMU, ISSN 2291-5222) is a spin-off journal of JMIR, the leading eHealth journal (Impact Factor 2016: 5.175). JMIR mHealth and uHealth is indexed in PubMed, PubMed Central, and Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE), and in June 2017 received a stunning inaugural Impact Factor of 4.636. The journal focusses on health and biomedical applications in mobile and tablet computing, pervasive and ubiquitous computing, wearable computing and domotics. JMIR mHealth and uHealth publishes since 2013 and was the first mhealth journal in Pubmed. It publishes even faster and has a broader scope with including papers which are more technical or more formative/developmental than what would be published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research.
期刊最新文献
Implementation of a Technology-Based Mobile Obstetric Referral Emergency System (MORES): Qualitative Assessment of Health Workers in Rural Liberia. Evaluating the Sensitivity of Wearable Devices in Posttranscatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Functional Assessment. Using a Quality-Controlled Dataset From ViSi Mobile Monitoring for Analyzing Posture Patterns of Hospitalized Patients: Retrospective Observational Study. Validity of a Consumer-Based Wearable to Measure Clinical Parameters in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Healthy Controls: Observational Study. Mobile Apps for the Personal Safety of At-Risk Children and Youth: Scoping Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1