Quality-Assured Analysis of PIK3CA Mutations in Hormone Receptor–Positive/Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2–Negative Breast Cancer Tissue

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 PATHOLOGY Journal of Molecular Diagnostics Pub Date : 2024-04-30 DOI:10.1016/j.jmoldx.2024.04.003
Carolin Schmidt , Robert Stöhr , Lora Dimitrova , Matthias W. Beckmann , Matthias Rübner , Peter A. Fasching , Carsten Denkert , Ulrich Lehmann , Claudia Vollbrecht , Florian Haller , Arndt Hartmann , Ramona Erber
{"title":"Quality-Assured Analysis of PIK3CA Mutations in Hormone Receptor–Positive/Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2–Negative Breast Cancer Tissue","authors":"Carolin Schmidt ,&nbsp;Robert Stöhr ,&nbsp;Lora Dimitrova ,&nbsp;Matthias W. Beckmann ,&nbsp;Matthias Rübner ,&nbsp;Peter A. Fasching ,&nbsp;Carsten Denkert ,&nbsp;Ulrich Lehmann ,&nbsp;Claudia Vollbrecht ,&nbsp;Florian Haller ,&nbsp;Arndt Hartmann ,&nbsp;Ramona Erber","doi":"10.1016/j.jmoldx.2024.04.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In precision oncology, reliable testing of predictive molecular biomarkers is a prerequisite for optimal patient treatment. Interlaboratory comparisons are a crucial tool to verify diagnostic performance and reproducibility of one's approach. Herein is described the design and results of the first recurrent, internationally performed <em>PIK3CA</em> (phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3 kinase catalytic subunit α) breast cancer tissue external quality assessment (EQA), organized by German Quality in Pathology GmbH and started in 2021. After the internal pretesting phase performed by the (lead) panel institutes, in both 2021 and 2022, each EQA test set comprised <em>n</em> = 10 tissue samples of hormone receptor–positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative invasive breast cancer that had to be analyzed and reported by the participants. In 2021, the results were evaluated separately for German-speaking countries (part 1) and international laboratories (part 2). In 2022, the EQA was performed across the European Union. The EQA success rates were 84.6% (<em>n</em> = 11/13), 88.6% (<em>n</em> = 39/44), and 87.9% (<em>n</em> = 29/33) for EQA 2021 part 1, part 2, and EQA 2022, respectively. The most commonly used methods were next-generation sequencing and mutation-/allele-specific qualitative PCR-based assays. In summary, this recurrent <em>PIK3CA</em> EQA proved to be a suitable approach to obtain an international overview of methods used for <em>PIK3CA</em> mutation analysis, to evaluate them qualitatively, and identify the strengths and weaknesses of individual methods.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50128,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Molecular Diagnostics","volume":"26 7","pages":"Pages 624-637"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525157824000886/pdfft?md5=15cd603c9e8e35e03820df892655af33&pid=1-s2.0-S1525157824000886-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Molecular Diagnostics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525157824000886","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In precision oncology, reliable testing of predictive molecular biomarkers is a prerequisite for optimal patient treatment. Interlaboratory comparisons are a crucial tool to verify diagnostic performance and reproducibility of one's approach. Herein is described the design and results of the first recurrent, internationally performed PIK3CA (phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3 kinase catalytic subunit α) breast cancer tissue external quality assessment (EQA), organized by German Quality in Pathology GmbH and started in 2021. After the internal pretesting phase performed by the (lead) panel institutes, in both 2021 and 2022, each EQA test set comprised n = 10 tissue samples of hormone receptor–positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative invasive breast cancer that had to be analyzed and reported by the participants. In 2021, the results were evaluated separately for German-speaking countries (part 1) and international laboratories (part 2). In 2022, the EQA was performed across the European Union. The EQA success rates were 84.6% (n = 11/13), 88.6% (n = 39/44), and 87.9% (n = 29/33) for EQA 2021 part 1, part 2, and EQA 2022, respectively. The most commonly used methods were next-generation sequencing and mutation-/allele-specific qualitative PCR-based assays. In summary, this recurrent PIK3CA EQA proved to be a suitable approach to obtain an international overview of methods used for PIK3CA mutation analysis, to evaluate them qualitatively, and identify the strengths and weaknesses of individual methods.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
激素受体阳性/人类表皮生长因子受体 2 阴性乳腺癌组织中 PIK3CA 突变的质量保证分析:精准医学中的高质量分子生物标记物报告需要能力验证的故事
在精准肿瘤学中,可靠的预测性分子生物标记物检测是优化患者治疗的先决条件。实验室间比较是验证诊断性能和方法可重复性的重要工具。在此,我们介绍了由德国病理质量有限公司(German Quality in Pathology GmbH)组织、于2021年开始的首次国际性乳腺癌组织(磷脂酰肌醇-4,5-二磷酸3激酶催化亚基α)外部质量评估(EQA)的设计和结果。在(牵头)专家小组机构进行内部预检阶段后,2021年和2022年,每个EQA测试集由=10个激素受体阳性、人表皮生长因子受体2阴性的浸润性乳腺癌组织样本组成,参与者必须对这些样本进行分析和报告。2021 年,分别对德语国家(第 1 部分)和国际实验室(第 2 部分)的结果进行了评估。2022 年,在整个欧盟范围内进行了 EQA。EQA 2021第一部分、EQA 2021第二部分和EQA 2022的EQA成功率分别为84.6%(=11/13)、88.6%(=39/44)和87.9%(=29/33)。最常用的方法是新一代测序和基于突变/等位基因特异性定性 PCR 的检测。总之,这种经常性的 EQA 被证明是预测性分子生物标记物检测质量评估的一种合适方法,可用于了解突变分析所用方法的国际概况,并确定各种方法的优缺点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
2.40%
发文量
143
审稿时长
43 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics, the official publication of the Association for Molecular Pathology (AMP), co-owned by the American Society for Investigative Pathology (ASIP), seeks to publish high quality original papers on scientific advances in the translation and validation of molecular discoveries in medicine into the clinical diagnostic setting, and the description and application of technological advances in the field of molecular diagnostic medicine. The editors welcome for review articles that contain: novel discoveries or clinicopathologic correlations including studies in oncology, infectious diseases, inherited diseases, predisposition to disease, clinical informatics, or the description of polymorphisms linked to disease states or normal variations; the application of diagnostic methodologies in clinical trials; or the development of new or improved molecular methods which may be applied to diagnosis or monitoring of disease or disease predisposition.
期刊最新文献
Association of mitochondrial DNA copy number in peripheral blood with risk and prognosis in acute aortic syndrome. Distribution of BCR::ABL1 transcript types and response to therapy in pediatric patients with chronic myeloid leukemia. Pharmacogenetic Testing in Admixed Populations: Frequency of the AMR PGx Working Group Tier 1 Variant Alleles in Brazilians. Optimization of pre-analytical handling to maintain DNA integrity in diagnostic Papanicolaou tests. Correction.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1