Walkability index for world heritage cities in developing countries

IF 2.6 3区 经济学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI:10.1177/23998083241250265
Liliana S Valverde-Caballero, Luis M Mendoza-Salazar, Cinthya L Butron-Revilla, Ernesto Suarez-Lopez, Jesus S Aguilar-Ruiz
{"title":"Walkability index for world heritage cities in developing countries","authors":"Liliana S Valverde-Caballero, Luis M Mendoza-Salazar, Cinthya L Butron-Revilla, Ernesto Suarez-Lopez, Jesus S Aguilar-Ruiz","doi":"10.1177/23998083241250265","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Walkability principles are an important part in the planning process of cities that face urban problems such as gentrification, pollution, and decay of their built heritage. The proposed factors – connectivity, proximity, land use mix, and retail density – form a comprehensive framework for evaluating walkability that transcends the boundaries of historical cities. These factors, while initially identified within historical contexts, possess inherent qualities that render them universally adaptable to various urban landscapes. By leveraging these factors, urban planners gain insights into the intricate fabric of pedestrian experiences in cities. They serve as universal evaluative tools, applicable not only to historical cities but also to burgeoning metropolises and smaller urban centres. This work introduces a novel approach to assessing the Walkability Index for World Heritage Cities, utilizing a Multiple Criteria Spatial Decision Support System (GIS-MCDA) structured in four stages. The approached methodology is particularly valuable for governments and decision-makers in developing countries of the Global South, where limitations in data and available tools are common challenges. The insights gained from this study can guide the improvement of policies, enable more precise implementation of sustainable mobility infrastructure, and motivate the pursuit or maintenance of UNESCO World Heritage nominations. The case study focused on the Historical Centre of Arequipa, Peru, a city designated as a UNESCO World Heritage site. The results of this study demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach in such contexts, owing to its specificity and the integration of both objective and subjective elements.","PeriodicalId":11863,"journal":{"name":"Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23998083241250265","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Walkability principles are an important part in the planning process of cities that face urban problems such as gentrification, pollution, and decay of their built heritage. The proposed factors – connectivity, proximity, land use mix, and retail density – form a comprehensive framework for evaluating walkability that transcends the boundaries of historical cities. These factors, while initially identified within historical contexts, possess inherent qualities that render them universally adaptable to various urban landscapes. By leveraging these factors, urban planners gain insights into the intricate fabric of pedestrian experiences in cities. They serve as universal evaluative tools, applicable not only to historical cities but also to burgeoning metropolises and smaller urban centres. This work introduces a novel approach to assessing the Walkability Index for World Heritage Cities, utilizing a Multiple Criteria Spatial Decision Support System (GIS-MCDA) structured in four stages. The approached methodology is particularly valuable for governments and decision-makers in developing countries of the Global South, where limitations in data and available tools are common challenges. The insights gained from this study can guide the improvement of policies, enable more precise implementation of sustainable mobility infrastructure, and motivate the pursuit or maintenance of UNESCO World Heritage nominations. The case study focused on the Historical Centre of Arequipa, Peru, a city designated as a UNESCO World Heritage site. The results of this study demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach in such contexts, owing to its specificity and the integration of both objective and subjective elements.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
发展中国家世界遗产城市步行便利指数
对于面临城市化、污染和建筑遗产衰落等城市问题的城市来说,步行性原则是规划过程中的一个重要组成部分。所提出的因素--连通性、邻近性、土地利用组合和零售密度--构成了一个评估步行适宜性的综合框架,它超越了历史城市的界限。这些因素虽然最初是在历史背景下确定的,但其固有的特质使它们普遍适用于各种城市景观。通过利用这些因素,城市规划者可以深入了解城市中错综复杂的行人体验结构。它们是通用的评估工具,不仅适用于历史名城,也适用于新兴大都市和较小的城市中心。这项工作介绍了一种评估世界遗产城市步行能力指数的新方法,该方法利用多标准空间决策支持系统(GIS-MCDA),分为四个阶段。这种方法对全球南部发展中国家的政府和决策者尤其有价值,因为这些国家面临的共同挑战是数据和可用工具的限制。从这项研究中获得的启示可以指导政策的改进,使可持续交通基础设施的实施更加精确,并推动对联合国教科文组织世界遗产提名的追求或维护。案例研究的重点是秘鲁阿雷基帕历史中心,这是一座被联合国教科文组织指定为世界遗产的城市。研究结果表明,由于其特殊性以及客观和主观因素的结合,所提议的方法在此类情况下非常有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
11.40%
发文量
159
期刊最新文献
Investigating urban morphological drivers of household water use in developing economies: A structural equation model approach Towards a more realistic estimation of urban land take by combining cadastral parcels and building footprints A sidewalk-level urban heat risk assessment framework using pedestrian mobility and urban microclimate modeling Mapping sense of place as a measurable urban identity: Using street view images and machine learning to identify building façade materials Visualizing the global deployment of Filipina workers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1