Mixed-methods evaluation of an enhanced asthma biologics clinical pathway in the West Midlands UK

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE NPJ Primary Care Respiratory Medicine Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI:10.1038/s41533-024-00365-y
Sarah Damery, Janet Jones, Elfatih Idris, Angela Cooper, Holly Minshall, Chris Clowes, Kate Jolly
{"title":"Mixed-methods evaluation of an enhanced asthma biologics clinical pathway in the West Midlands UK","authors":"Sarah Damery, Janet Jones, Elfatih Idris, Angela Cooper, Holly Minshall, Chris Clowes, Kate Jolly","doi":"10.1038/s41533-024-00365-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Biologic treatments can alleviate severe asthma symptoms and reduce health service use. However, service capacity limits and low referral rates from primary care indicate unmet patient need. We report a mixed-methods evaluation of an enhanced severe asthma pathway implemented in Staffordshire and Stoke-on-Trent, UK which aimed to optimise primary care referrals through training/education, and increased capacity in specialist clinics. Quantitative analysis assessed patient wait times between pathway stages, prescribing changes, exacerbations, hospital admissions and asthma control. Interviews with 12 stakeholders evaluated perceptions of the enhanced pathway across settings. In 12 months, 564 patients from 28 general practices were reviewed for biologics eligibility, of whom 125 (22.2%) were referred for specialist assessment. Wait times were significantly lower under the enhanced pathway when compared against historic patients following the standard pathway, and reduced overall from a mean of 76.4 to 26.7 weeks between referral and biologics initiation (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Patients commencing biologics (<i>n</i> = 46) showed significantly reduced reliever inhaler prescribing rates (<i>p</i> = 0.037), 60% lower oral steroid use (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), significantly reduced exacerbation rates (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) and fewer hospital admissions (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) compared with the 12 months pre-treatment. Mean asthma control scores reduced from 3.13 pre-initiation to 1.89 post-initiation (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) – a clinically significant improvement. Interviewees viewed the enhanced pathway positively, although ongoing issues related to difficulties engaging primary care amid concerns around increased workloads and pathway capacity. The large number of referrals generated from a comparatively small number of general practices confirms substantial unmet need that an enhanced severe asthma pathway could help address if implemented routinely.</p>","PeriodicalId":19470,"journal":{"name":"NPJ Primary Care Respiratory Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NPJ Primary Care Respiratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41533-024-00365-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Biologic treatments can alleviate severe asthma symptoms and reduce health service use. However, service capacity limits and low referral rates from primary care indicate unmet patient need. We report a mixed-methods evaluation of an enhanced severe asthma pathway implemented in Staffordshire and Stoke-on-Trent, UK which aimed to optimise primary care referrals through training/education, and increased capacity in specialist clinics. Quantitative analysis assessed patient wait times between pathway stages, prescribing changes, exacerbations, hospital admissions and asthma control. Interviews with 12 stakeholders evaluated perceptions of the enhanced pathway across settings. In 12 months, 564 patients from 28 general practices were reviewed for biologics eligibility, of whom 125 (22.2%) were referred for specialist assessment. Wait times were significantly lower under the enhanced pathway when compared against historic patients following the standard pathway, and reduced overall from a mean of 76.4 to 26.7 weeks between referral and biologics initiation (p < 0.001). Patients commencing biologics (n = 46) showed significantly reduced reliever inhaler prescribing rates (p = 0.037), 60% lower oral steroid use (p < 0.001), significantly reduced exacerbation rates (p < 0.001) and fewer hospital admissions (p < 0.001) compared with the 12 months pre-treatment. Mean asthma control scores reduced from 3.13 pre-initiation to 1.89 post-initiation (p < 0.001) – a clinically significant improvement. Interviewees viewed the enhanced pathway positively, although ongoing issues related to difficulties engaging primary care amid concerns around increased workloads and pathway capacity. The large number of referrals generated from a comparatively small number of general practices confirms substantial unmet need that an enhanced severe asthma pathway could help address if implemented routinely.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
英国西米德兰兹郡哮喘生物制剂临床路径的混合方法评估
生物治疗可以缓解严重的哮喘症状,减少医疗服务的使用。然而,服务能力的限制和基层医疗机构的低转诊率表明患者的需求尚未得到满足。我们报告了对英国斯塔福德郡和斯托克特伦特河畔实施的增强型重症哮喘治疗路径的混合方法评估,该路径旨在通过培训/教育优化初级医疗转诊,并提高专科诊所的服务能力。定量分析评估了患者在路径阶段之间的等待时间、处方变化、病情恶化、入院和哮喘控制情况。对 12 位利益相关者进行了访谈,评估了他们对不同环境下强化路径的看法。在 12 个月内,对 28 家普通诊所的 564 名患者进行了生物制剂资格审查,其中 125 人(22.2%)被转至专科评估。与采用标准路径的历史患者相比,强化路径下的等待时间明显缩短,从转诊到开始使用生物制剂的平均时间从 76.4 周减少到 26.7 周(p < 0.001)。与治疗前的 12 个月相比,开始使用生物制剂的患者(n = 46)的缓解吸入器处方率明显降低(p = 0.037),口服类固醇用量减少 60%(p < 0.001),病情恶化率明显降低(p < 0.001),入院次数减少(p < 0.001)。哮喘控制评分的平均值从开始治疗前的 3.13 分降至开始治疗后的 1.89 分(p < 0.001),这是一项具有临床意义的改善。受访者对改进后的治疗路径持积极态度,但在工作量和治疗路径容量增加的情况下,仍存在与基层医疗机构接触困难有关的问题。从相对较少的全科医疗机构中产生的大量转诊证实了大量未得到满足的需求,如果常规实施强化的重症哮喘路径,将有助于解决这些问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
NPJ Primary Care Respiratory Medicine
NPJ Primary Care Respiratory Medicine PRIMARY HEALTH CARE-RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
6.50%
发文量
49
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: npj Primary Care Respiratory Medicine is an open access, online-only, multidisciplinary journal dedicated to publishing high-quality research in all areas of the primary care management of respiratory and respiratory-related allergic diseases. Papers published by the journal represent important advances of significance to specialists within the fields of primary care and respiratory medicine. We are particularly interested in receiving papers in relation to the following aspects of respiratory medicine, respiratory-related allergic diseases and tobacco control: epidemiology prevention clinical care service delivery and organisation of healthcare (including implementation science) global health.
期刊最新文献
Breathlessness without borders: a call to action for global breathlessness research. Long COVID demographic and secondary care referral characteristics in primary care: analysis of anonymised primary care data from a multiethnic, deprived urban area in the UK. Clinical reasoning amongst paramedics using nebulised β₂ agonists to treat acute asthma exacerbations: a qualitative study. Uncovering patterns of inhaler technique and reliever use: the value of objective, personalized data from a digital inhaler. Improving allergy management and treatment: a proposed algorithm and curriculum for prescribing allergen immunotherapy in the primary care setting.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1