Exploring the impact of Anaplasma phagocytophilum on colonization resistance of Ixodes scapularis microbiota using network node manipulation

Lianet Abuin-Denis , Elianne Piloto-Sardiñas , Apolline Maître , Alejandra Wu-Chuang , Lourdes Mateos-Hernández , Dasiel Obregon , Belkis Corona-González , Andréa Cristina Fogaça , Vaidas Palinauskas , Justė Aželytė , Alina Rodríguez-Mallon , Alejandro Cabezas-Cruz
{"title":"Exploring the impact of Anaplasma phagocytophilum on colonization resistance of Ixodes scapularis microbiota using network node manipulation","authors":"Lianet Abuin-Denis ,&nbsp;Elianne Piloto-Sardiñas ,&nbsp;Apolline Maître ,&nbsp;Alejandra Wu-Chuang ,&nbsp;Lourdes Mateos-Hernández ,&nbsp;Dasiel Obregon ,&nbsp;Belkis Corona-González ,&nbsp;Andréa Cristina Fogaça ,&nbsp;Vaidas Palinauskas ,&nbsp;Justė Aželytė ,&nbsp;Alina Rodríguez-Mallon ,&nbsp;Alejandro Cabezas-Cruz","doi":"10.1016/j.crpvbd.2024.100177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Upon ingestion from an infected host, tick-borne pathogens (TBPs) have to overcome colonization resistance, a defense mechanism by which tick microbiota prevent microbial invasions. Previous studies have shown that the pathogen <em>Anaplasma phagocytophilum</em> alters the microbiota composition of the nymphs of <em>Ixodes scapularis</em>, but its impact on tick colonization resistance remains unclear. We analyzed tick microbiome genetic data using published Illumina 16S rRNA sequences, assessing microbial diversity within ticks (alpha diversity) through species richness, evenness, and phylogenetic diversity. We compared microbial communities in ticks with and without infection with <em>A. phagocytophilum</em> (beta diversity) using the Bray-Curtis index. We also built co-occurrence networks and used node manipulation to study the impact of <em>A. phagocytophilum</em> on microbial assembly and network robustness, crucial for colonization resistance. We examined network robustness by altering its connectivity, observing changes in the largest connected component (LCC) and the average path length (APL). Our findings revealed that infection with <em>A. phagocytophilum</em> does not significantly alter the overall microbial diversity in ticks. Despite a decrease in the number of nodes and connections within the microbial networks of infected ticks, certain core microbes remained consistently interconnected, suggesting a functional role. The network of infected ticks showed a heightened vulnerability to node removal, with smaller LCC and longer APL, indicating reduced resilience compared to the network of uninfected ticks. Interestingly, adding nodes to the network of infected ticks led to an increase in LCC and a decrease in APL, suggesting a recovery in network robustness, a trend not observed in networks of uninfected ticks. This improvement in network robustness upon node addition hints that infection with <em>A. phagocytophilum</em> might lower ticksʼ resistance to colonization, potentially facilitating further microbial invasions. We conclude that the compromised colonization resistance observed in tick microbiota following infection with <em>A. phagocytophilum</em> may facilitate co-infection in natural tick populations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":94311,"journal":{"name":"Current research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100177"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667114X24000086/pdfft?md5=1a32518a61c629ac7accccd88fdddb4f&pid=1-s2.0-S2667114X24000086-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667114X24000086","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PARASITOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Upon ingestion from an infected host, tick-borne pathogens (TBPs) have to overcome colonization resistance, a defense mechanism by which tick microbiota prevent microbial invasions. Previous studies have shown that the pathogen Anaplasma phagocytophilum alters the microbiota composition of the nymphs of Ixodes scapularis, but its impact on tick colonization resistance remains unclear. We analyzed tick microbiome genetic data using published Illumina 16S rRNA sequences, assessing microbial diversity within ticks (alpha diversity) through species richness, evenness, and phylogenetic diversity. We compared microbial communities in ticks with and without infection with A. phagocytophilum (beta diversity) using the Bray-Curtis index. We also built co-occurrence networks and used node manipulation to study the impact of A. phagocytophilum on microbial assembly and network robustness, crucial for colonization resistance. We examined network robustness by altering its connectivity, observing changes in the largest connected component (LCC) and the average path length (APL). Our findings revealed that infection with A. phagocytophilum does not significantly alter the overall microbial diversity in ticks. Despite a decrease in the number of nodes and connections within the microbial networks of infected ticks, certain core microbes remained consistently interconnected, suggesting a functional role. The network of infected ticks showed a heightened vulnerability to node removal, with smaller LCC and longer APL, indicating reduced resilience compared to the network of uninfected ticks. Interestingly, adding nodes to the network of infected ticks led to an increase in LCC and a decrease in APL, suggesting a recovery in network robustness, a trend not observed in networks of uninfected ticks. This improvement in network robustness upon node addition hints that infection with A. phagocytophilum might lower ticksʼ resistance to colonization, potentially facilitating further microbial invasions. We conclude that the compromised colonization resistance observed in tick microbiota following infection with A. phagocytophilum may facilitate co-infection in natural tick populations.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用网络节点操作探索噬细胞嗜酸性阿纳疟原虫对黄斑伊蚊微生物群定植抗性的影响
蜱传病原体(TBPs)从受感染的宿主体内摄入后,必须克服定植抵抗,这是蜱虫微生物群防止微生物入侵的一种防御机制。以前的研究表明,病原体噬细胞嗜酸性阿纳疟原虫(Anaplasma phagocytophilum)会改变蜱若虫的微生物群组成,但其对蜱定殖抵抗力的影响仍不清楚。我们利用已发表的 Illumina 16S rRNA 序列分析了蜱微生物组遗传数据,通过物种丰富度、均匀度和系统发育多样性评估了蜱体内的微生物多样性(α多样性)。我们使用布雷-柯蒂斯指数(Bray-Curtis index)比较了感染和未感染噬细胞甲虫的蜱虫体内的微生物群落(β多样性)。我们还建立了共生网络,并使用节点操作来研究噬细胞甲对微生物集结和网络稳健性的影响,这对抗定殖至关重要。我们通过改变网络的连通性来检测网络的稳健性,观察最大连通分量(LCC)和平均路径长度(APL)的变化。我们的研究结果表明,感染噬菌体并不会显著改变蜱体内微生物的整体多样性。尽管受感染蜱虫微生物网络中的节点和连接数量有所减少,但某些核心微生物仍然保持着持续的相互连接,这表明了它们的功能性作用。与未感染蜱虫的网络相比,感染蜱虫的网络更容易受到节点移除的影响,其 LCC 更小,APL 更长,这表明其恢复能力更弱。有趣的是,向受感染的蜱网络中添加节点会导致 LCC 增加、APL 减少,这表明网络的稳健性有所恢复,而这一趋势在未感染的蜱网络中没有观察到。节点添加后网络稳健性的改善表明,噬细胞嗜血杆菌感染可能会降低蜱对定殖的抵抗力,从而有可能促进微生物的进一步入侵。我们的结论是,在蜱微生物群中观察到的噬菌体感染后定植抵抗力下降可能会促进自然蜱群中的共感染。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Larvicidal activity of Bacillus thuringiensis strains against Aedes aegypti and Culex quinquefasciatus mosquitoes Genetic diversity of Plasmodium vivax and Plasmodium falciparum field isolates from Honduras in the malaria elimination phase Redefining Rhipicephalus sanguineus (sensu lato) species complex in Greece focusing on the mitogenome of Rhipicephalus secundus DNA-elucidated life cycle of a highly pathogenic avian nematode: Streptocara incognita (Spirurida: Acuariidae) and its morphological development from infective third-stage larva to adult Small mammals as hosts of vector-borne pathogens in the High Tatra Mountains region in Slovakia, Central Europe
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1