Major axes of variation in tree demography across global forests

IF 5.4 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Ecography Pub Date : 2024-05-06 DOI:10.1111/ecog.07187
Melina de Souza Leite, Sean M. McMahon, Paulo Inácio Prado, Stuart J. Davies, Alexandre Adalardo de Oliveira, Hannes P. De Deurwaerder, Salomón Aguilar, Kristina J. Anderson-Teixeira, Nurfarah Aqilah, Norman A. Bourg, Warren Y. Brockelman, Nicolas Castaño, Chia-Hao Chang-Yang, Yu-Yun Chen, George Chuyong, Keith Clay, Álvaro Duque, Sisira Ediriweera, Corneille E. N. Ewango, Gregory Gilbert, I. A. U. N. Gunatilleke, C. V. S. Gunatilleke, Robert Howe, Walter Huaraca Huasco, Akira Itoh, Daniel J. Johnson, David Kenfack, Kamil Král, Yao Tze Leong, James A. Lutz, Jean-Remy Makana, Yadvinder Malhi, William J. McShea, Mohizah Mohamad, Musalmah Nasardin, Anuttara Nathalang, Geoffrey Parker, Renan Parmigiani, Rolando Pérez, Richard P. Phillips, Pavel Šamonil, I-Fang Sun, Sylvester Tan, Duncan Thomas, Jill Thompson, María Uriarte, Amy Wolf, Jess Zimmerman, Daniel Zuleta, Marco D. Visser, Lisa Hülsmann
{"title":"Major axes of variation in tree demography across global forests","authors":"Melina de Souza Leite,&nbsp;Sean M. McMahon,&nbsp;Paulo Inácio Prado,&nbsp;Stuart J. Davies,&nbsp;Alexandre Adalardo de Oliveira,&nbsp;Hannes P. De Deurwaerder,&nbsp;Salomón Aguilar,&nbsp;Kristina J. Anderson-Teixeira,&nbsp;Nurfarah Aqilah,&nbsp;Norman A. Bourg,&nbsp;Warren Y. Brockelman,&nbsp;Nicolas Castaño,&nbsp;Chia-Hao Chang-Yang,&nbsp;Yu-Yun Chen,&nbsp;George Chuyong,&nbsp;Keith Clay,&nbsp;Álvaro Duque,&nbsp;Sisira Ediriweera,&nbsp;Corneille E. N. Ewango,&nbsp;Gregory Gilbert,&nbsp;I. A. U. N. Gunatilleke,&nbsp;C. V. S. Gunatilleke,&nbsp;Robert Howe,&nbsp;Walter Huaraca Huasco,&nbsp;Akira Itoh,&nbsp;Daniel J. Johnson,&nbsp;David Kenfack,&nbsp;Kamil Král,&nbsp;Yao Tze Leong,&nbsp;James A. Lutz,&nbsp;Jean-Remy Makana,&nbsp;Yadvinder Malhi,&nbsp;William J. McShea,&nbsp;Mohizah Mohamad,&nbsp;Musalmah Nasardin,&nbsp;Anuttara Nathalang,&nbsp;Geoffrey Parker,&nbsp;Renan Parmigiani,&nbsp;Rolando Pérez,&nbsp;Richard P. Phillips,&nbsp;Pavel Šamonil,&nbsp;I-Fang Sun,&nbsp;Sylvester Tan,&nbsp;Duncan Thomas,&nbsp;Jill Thompson,&nbsp;María Uriarte,&nbsp;Amy Wolf,&nbsp;Jess Zimmerman,&nbsp;Daniel Zuleta,&nbsp;Marco D. Visser,&nbsp;Lisa Hülsmann","doi":"10.1111/ecog.07187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The future trajectory of global forests is closely intertwined with tree demography, and a major fundamental goal in ecology is to understand the key mechanisms governing spatio-temporal patterns in tree population dynamics. While previous research has made substantial progress in identifying the mechanisms individually, their relative importance among forests remains unclear mainly due to practical limitations. One approach to overcome these limitations is to group mechanisms according to their shared effects on the variability of tree vital rates and quantify patterns therein. We developed a conceptual and statistical framework (variance partitioning of Bayesian multilevel models) that attributes the variability in tree growth, mortality, and recruitment to variation in species, space, and time, and their interactions – categories we refer to as <i>organising principles</i> (OPs). We applied the framework to data from 21 forest plots covering more than 2.9 million trees of approximately 6500 species. We found that differences among species, the <i>species</i> OP, proved a major source of variability in tree vital rates, explaining 28–33% of demographic variance alone, and 14–17% in interaction with <i>space</i>, totalling 40–43%. Our results support the hypothesis that the range of vital rates is similar across global forests. However, the average variability among species declined with species richness, indicating that diverse forests featured smaller interspecific differences in vital rates. Moreover, decomposing the variance in vital rates into the proposed OPs showed the importance of unexplained variability, which includes individual variation, in tree demography. A focus on how demographic variance is organized in forests can facilitate the construction of more targeted models with clearer expectations of which covariates might drive a vital rate. This study therefore highlights the most promising avenues for future research, both in terms of understanding the relative contributions of groups of mechanisms to forest demography and diversity, and for improving projections of forest ecosystems.</p>","PeriodicalId":51026,"journal":{"name":"Ecography","volume":"2024 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ecog.07187","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecography","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ecog.07187","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The future trajectory of global forests is closely intertwined with tree demography, and a major fundamental goal in ecology is to understand the key mechanisms governing spatio-temporal patterns in tree population dynamics. While previous research has made substantial progress in identifying the mechanisms individually, their relative importance among forests remains unclear mainly due to practical limitations. One approach to overcome these limitations is to group mechanisms according to their shared effects on the variability of tree vital rates and quantify patterns therein. We developed a conceptual and statistical framework (variance partitioning of Bayesian multilevel models) that attributes the variability in tree growth, mortality, and recruitment to variation in species, space, and time, and their interactions – categories we refer to as organising principles (OPs). We applied the framework to data from 21 forest plots covering more than 2.9 million trees of approximately 6500 species. We found that differences among species, the species OP, proved a major source of variability in tree vital rates, explaining 28–33% of demographic variance alone, and 14–17% in interaction with space, totalling 40–43%. Our results support the hypothesis that the range of vital rates is similar across global forests. However, the average variability among species declined with species richness, indicating that diverse forests featured smaller interspecific differences in vital rates. Moreover, decomposing the variance in vital rates into the proposed OPs showed the importance of unexplained variability, which includes individual variation, in tree demography. A focus on how demographic variance is organized in forests can facilitate the construction of more targeted models with clearer expectations of which covariates might drive a vital rate. This study therefore highlights the most promising avenues for future research, both in terms of understanding the relative contributions of groups of mechanisms to forest demography and diversity, and for improving projections of forest ecosystems.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全球森林树木形态变化的主要轴线
全球森林的未来轨迹与树木的种群结构密切相关,而生态学的一个主要基本目标就是了解支配树木种群动态时空模式的关键机制。虽然以往的研究在确定各个机制方面取得了重大进展,但主要由于实际条件的限制,这些机制在不同森林中的相对重要性仍不明确。克服这些局限性的方法之一是根据机制对树木生命率变化的共同影响对其进行分组,并对其中的模式进行量化。我们建立了一个概念和统计框架(贝叶斯多层次模型的方差分割),将树木生长、死亡和新陈代谢的变异归因于物种、空间和时间的变异及其相互作用--我们称之为组织原则(OPs)。我们将该框架应用于 21 个森林地块的数据,这些数据涵盖了约 6500 个物种的 290 多万棵树木。我们发现,物种之间的差异,即物种 OP,是树木生命率变异的主要来源,单独解释了人口变异的 28-33%,与空间相互作用时解释了 14-17%,总计解释了 40-43%。我们的研究结果支持这样的假设,即全球森林的生命率范围是相似的。然而,物种间的平均变异性随着物种丰富度的增加而下降,这表明多样性森林的物种间生命率差异较小。此外,将生命率的变异分解为建议的 OPs 表明了未解释变异(包括个体差异)在树木人口统计学中的重要性。关注森林中人口变异是如何组织的,有助于构建更有针对性的模型,更清晰地预期哪些协变量可能会驱动生命率。因此,本研究强调了未来最有希望的研究方向,既有助于了解各组机制对森林人口统计和多样性的相对贡献,也有助于改进对森林生态系统的预测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ecography
Ecography 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
3.40%
发文量
122
审稿时长
8-16 weeks
期刊介绍: ECOGRAPHY publishes exciting, novel, and important articles that significantly advance understanding of ecological or biodiversity patterns in space or time. Papers focusing on conservation or restoration are welcomed, provided they are anchored in ecological theory and convey a general message that goes beyond a single case study. We encourage papers that seek advancing the field through the development and testing of theory or methodology, or by proposing new tools for analysis or interpretation of ecological phenomena. Manuscripts are expected to address general principles in ecology, though they may do so using a specific model system if they adequately frame the problem relative to a generalized ecological question or problem. Purely descriptive papers are considered only if breaking new ground and/or describing patterns seldom explored. Studies focused on a single species or single location are generally discouraged unless they make a significant contribution to advancing general theory or understanding of biodiversity patterns and processes. Manuscripts merely confirming or marginally extending results of previous work are unlikely to be considered in Ecography. Papers are judged by virtue of their originality, appeal to general interest, and their contribution to new developments in studies of spatial and temporal ecological patterns. There are no biases with regard to taxon, biome, or biogeographical area.
期刊最新文献
Colonization and extinction lags drive non-linear responses to warming in mountain plant communities across the Northern Hemisphere Differential predation patterns of free-ranging cats among continents Competitive interactions modify the direct effects of climate Achieving higher standards in species distribution modeling by leveraging the diversity of available software Seasonal macro-demography of North American bird populations revealed through participatory science
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1