Sustainability and impact of an intervention to improve initiation of tuberculosis preventive treatment: results from a follow-up study of the ACT4 randomized trial.

IF 9.6 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL EClinicalMedicine Pub Date : 2024-03-28 eCollection Date: 2024-05-01 DOI:10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102546
Dick Menzies, Joseph Obeng, Panji Hadisoemarto, Rovina Ruslami, Menonli Adjobimey, Dina Fisher, Leila Barss, Nancy Bedingfield, Richard Long, Catherine Paulsen, James Johnston, Kamila Romanowski, Victoria J Cook, Greg J Fox, Thu Anh Nguyen, Chantal Valiquette, Olivia Oxlade, Federica Fregonese, Andrea Benedetti
{"title":"Sustainability and impact of an intervention to improve initiation of tuberculosis preventive treatment: results from a follow-up study of the ACT4 randomized trial.","authors":"Dick Menzies, Joseph Obeng, Panji Hadisoemarto, Rovina Ruslami, Menonli Adjobimey, Dina Fisher, Leila Barss, Nancy Bedingfield, Richard Long, Catherine Paulsen, James Johnston, Kamila Romanowski, Victoria J Cook, Greg J Fox, Thu Anh Nguyen, Chantal Valiquette, Olivia Oxlade, Federica Fregonese, Andrea Benedetti","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102546","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In a cluster randomized trial (clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02810678) a flexible but comprehensive health system intervention significantly increased the number of household contacts (HHC) identified and started on tuberculosis preventive treatment (TPT). A follow-up study was conducted one year later to test the hypotheses that these effects were sustained, and were reproducible with a simplified intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a follow-up study from May 1, 2018 until April 30, 2019, as part of a multinational cluster randomized trial. Eight sites in 4 countries that had received the intervention in the original trial received no further intervention; eight other sites in the same countries that had not received the intervention (control sites in the original trial) now received a simplified version of the intervention. This consisted of repeated local evaluation of the Cascade of care for TB infection, and stakeholder decision making. The number of HHC identified and starting TPT were repeatedly measured at all 16 sites and expressed as rates per 100 newly diagnosed index TB patients. The sustained effect of the original intervention was estimated by comparing these rates after the intervention in the original trial with the last 6 months of the follow-up study. The reproducibility was estimated by comparing the pre-post intervention changes in rates at sites receiving the original intervention with the pre-post changes in rates at sites receiving the later, simplified intervention.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>With regard to the sustained impact of the original intervention, compared to the original post-intervention period, the number of HHC identified and treated per 100 newly diagnosed TB patients was 10 more (95% confidence interval: 84 fewer to 105 more), and 1 fewer (95% CI: 22 fewer to 20 more) respectively up to 14 months after the end of the original intervention. With regard to the reproducibility of the simplified intervention, at sites that had initially served as control sites, the number of HHC identified and treated per 100 TB patients increased by 33 (95% CI: -32, 97), and 16 (-69, 100) from 3 months before, to up to 6 months after receiving a streamlined intervention, although differences were larger, and significant if the post-intervention results were compared to all pre-intervention periods.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Up to one year after it ended, a health system intervention resulted in sustained increases in the number of HHC identified and starting TPT. A simplified version of the intervention was associated with non-significant increases in the identification and treatment of HHC. Inferences are limited by potential bias due to other temporal effects, and the small number of study sites.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>Funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (Grant number 143350).</p>","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":9.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10998081/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EClinicalMedicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102546","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In a cluster randomized trial (clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02810678) a flexible but comprehensive health system intervention significantly increased the number of household contacts (HHC) identified and started on tuberculosis preventive treatment (TPT). A follow-up study was conducted one year later to test the hypotheses that these effects were sustained, and were reproducible with a simplified intervention.

Methods: We conducted a follow-up study from May 1, 2018 until April 30, 2019, as part of a multinational cluster randomized trial. Eight sites in 4 countries that had received the intervention in the original trial received no further intervention; eight other sites in the same countries that had not received the intervention (control sites in the original trial) now received a simplified version of the intervention. This consisted of repeated local evaluation of the Cascade of care for TB infection, and stakeholder decision making. The number of HHC identified and starting TPT were repeatedly measured at all 16 sites and expressed as rates per 100 newly diagnosed index TB patients. The sustained effect of the original intervention was estimated by comparing these rates after the intervention in the original trial with the last 6 months of the follow-up study. The reproducibility was estimated by comparing the pre-post intervention changes in rates at sites receiving the original intervention with the pre-post changes in rates at sites receiving the later, simplified intervention.

Findings: With regard to the sustained impact of the original intervention, compared to the original post-intervention period, the number of HHC identified and treated per 100 newly diagnosed TB patients was 10 more (95% confidence interval: 84 fewer to 105 more), and 1 fewer (95% CI: 22 fewer to 20 more) respectively up to 14 months after the end of the original intervention. With regard to the reproducibility of the simplified intervention, at sites that had initially served as control sites, the number of HHC identified and treated per 100 TB patients increased by 33 (95% CI: -32, 97), and 16 (-69, 100) from 3 months before, to up to 6 months after receiving a streamlined intervention, although differences were larger, and significant if the post-intervention results were compared to all pre-intervention periods.

Interpretation: Up to one year after it ended, a health system intervention resulted in sustained increases in the number of HHC identified and starting TPT. A simplified version of the intervention was associated with non-significant increases in the identification and treatment of HHC. Inferences are limited by potential bias due to other temporal effects, and the small number of study sites.

Funding: Funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (Grant number 143350).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
改善结核病预防治疗启动的干预措施的可持续性和影响:ACT4 随机试验后续研究的结果。
背景在一项分组随机试验(clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02810678)中,一项灵活而全面的卫生系统干预措施显著增加了家庭接触者(HHC)被识别并开始接受结核病预防治疗(TPT)的人数。一年后,我们进行了一项跟踪研究,以检验这些效果是否能够持续,以及是否能够通过简化的干预措施再现这些效果:我们从 2018 年 5 月 1 日到 2019 年 4 月 30 日开展了一项后续研究,这是一项多国分组随机试验的一部分。在最初试验中接受过干预措施的 4 个国家的 8 个地点不再接受进一步的干预措施;未接受过干预措施的同一国家的其他 8 个地点(最初试验中的对照地点)现在接受简化版的干预措施。这包括对肺结核感染级联护理进行反复的地方评估,以及利益相关者决策。在所有 16 个地点反复测量了被确认为 HHC 的人数和开始 TPT 的人数,并以每 100 名新诊断的指数肺结核患者的比率表示。通过比较原始试验干预后与后续研究最后 6 个月的这些比率,估算原始干预的持续效果。对可重复性的估算是通过比较接受原始干预措施的地点的干预前干预后发病率变化与接受后来简化干预措施的地点的干预前干预后发病率变化:关于原始干预措施的持续影响,与原始干预后相比,在原始干预措施结束后的 14 个月内,每 100 名新诊断的肺结核患者中被发现和接受治疗的人类乳头瘤病毒感染者人数分别增加了 10 人(95% 置信区间:减少 84 人至增加 105 人)和 1 人(95% 置信区间:减少 22 人至增加 20 人)。关于简化干预措施的可重复性,在最初作为对照的地点,从接受简化干预措施前 3 个月到接受干预措施后 6 个月,每 100 名肺结核患者中发现和治疗的高危人群数量分别增加了 33 人(95% 置信区间:-32, 97)和 16 人(-69, 100),但如果将干预措施后的结果与干预措施前的所有时期进行比较,则差异更大且显著:在干预结束后的一年内,卫生系统的干预措施能持续增加被确认为HHC并开始TPT的人数。简化版干预措施在识别和治疗高危人群方面的效果并不显著。由于其他时间效应导致的潜在偏差以及研究地点数量较少,推论受到限制:由加拿大卫生研究院资助(拨款号:143350)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
EClinicalMedicine
EClinicalMedicine Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
18.90
自引率
1.30%
发文量
506
审稿时长
22 days
期刊介绍: eClinicalMedicine is a gold open-access clinical journal designed to support frontline health professionals in addressing the complex and rapid health transitions affecting societies globally. The journal aims to assist practitioners in overcoming healthcare challenges across diverse communities, spanning diagnosis, treatment, prevention, and health promotion. Integrating disciplines from various specialties and life stages, it seeks to enhance health systems as fundamental institutions within societies. With a forward-thinking approach, eClinicalMedicine aims to redefine the future of healthcare.
期刊最新文献
Risk factors associated with post-tuberculosis sequelae: a systematic review and meta-analysis. CVN424, a GPR6 inverse agonist, for Parkinson's disease and motor fluctuations: a double-blind, randomized, phase 2 trial. Diagnostic performance of deep learning for infectious keratitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gut microbiota in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: an individual based analysis of publicly available data. The global burden of enteric fever, 2017-2021: a systematic analysis from the global burden of disease study 2021.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1