Pub Date : 2026-01-31eCollection Date: 2026-02-01DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103771
Sophia Riesemann, Theresa Tenge, Elena Ahrens, Luca J Wachtendorf, Béla-Simon Paschold, Denys Shay, Dario von Wedel, Kara Liebich, Justus P Student, Scott C Fligor, Lars Kaiser, Xiaohan Xu, Anastasia Katsiampoura, Linda Valeri, Victor Novack, Tara S Kent, Haobo Ma, Maximilian S Schaefer
Background: Postoperative delirium is a frequent, serious complication triggered by various factors including systemic inflammation. Dexamethasone, an inexpensive anti-inflammatory steroid frequently administered for prophylaxis of postoperative nausea and vomiting, attenuates inflammation. We hypothesised that intraoperative dexamethasone administration is associated with a lower risk of postoperative delirium and assessed whether this is modified by the occurrence of its key side effect, hyperglycaemia.
Methods: This retrospective cohort study analysed electronic health data from adult hospitalised patients undergoing non-cardiac, non-neurosurgical, and non-transplant procedures at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (Boston, MA, USA) between January 1, 2008, and January 15, 2024. Patients with missing data, preoperative delirium or glucocorticoid use, mechanical ventilation for 72 h or more, and those not expected to survive without the procedure, were excluded. The primary exposure was intraoperative administration of intravenous dexamethasone. The primary outcome was 7-day postoperative delirium, identified by keyword-triggered manual discharge note reviews, diagnostic codes, and the Confusion Assessment Method. Hyperglycaemia was defined as peak 24-h postoperative blood glucose of more than 180 mg/dL. All analyses were adjusted for 43 patient-related and procedure-related variables.
Findings: 92,832 patients were included (55.8% female, median age 60 years [IQR 48-70]), of which 41,983 (45.2%) received dexamethasone at a median dose of 8 mg (IQR 4-8). 2575 (2.8%) patients developed postoperative delirium. Emergency procedures accounted for 11,970 (12.9%) of cases. Intraoperative administration of dexamethasone was associated with a lower risk of delirium (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.63, 95% CI 0.56-0.70; p < 0.001; adjusted absolute risk difference -1.1%, 95% CI -1.3 to -0.8). The exploratory four-way mediation analysis suggested a 10.4% greater dexamethasone-associated reduction of postoperative delirium risk when hyperglycaemia did not occur (no hyperglycaemia aOR 0.59, 95% CI 0.51-0.67; p < 0.001; hyperglycaemia aOR 0.85, 95% CI 0.68-1.07; p = 0.17).
Interpretation: Intraoperative dexamethasone administration is associated with a lower risk of postoperative delirium, although this association was not evident in patients experiencing hyperglycaemia. Prospective studies should investigate the role of dexamethasone and optimised blood glucose control in delirium prevention.
Funding: Unrestricted philanthropic grant by Dr. J. and J. Buzen.
背景:术后谵妄是一种常见的严重并发症,由包括全身炎症在内的多种因素引起。地塞米松是一种廉价的抗炎类固醇,经常用于预防术后恶心和呕吐,可减轻炎症。我们假设术中给药地塞米松与较低的术后谵妄风险相关,并评估其主要副作用高血糖的发生是否改变了这一点。方法:这项回顾性队列研究分析了2008年1月1日至2024年1月15日在Beth Israel Deaconess医疗中心(Boston, MA, USA)接受非心脏、非神经外科和非移植手术的成年住院患者的电子健康数据。排除数据缺失、术前谵妄或使用糖皮质激素、机械通气72小时或更长时间以及不进行手术预计无法存活的患者。主要暴露是术中静脉注射地塞米松。主要结局是术后7天的谵妄,通过关键词触发的手动出院记录回顾、诊断代码和混淆评估法确定。高血糖定义为术后24小时血糖峰值大于180 mg/dL。所有的分析都针对43个与患者和手术相关的变量进行了调整。结果:纳入92,832例患者(55.8%为女性,中位年龄60岁[IQR 48-70]),其中41,983例(45.2%)接受中位剂量为8mg (IQR 4-8)的地塞米松治疗。2575例(2.8%)患者出现术后谵妄。急诊占11,970例(12.9%)。术中给予地塞米松与较低的谵妄风险相关(校正优势比[aOR] 0.63, 95% CI 0.56 ~ 0.70; p < 0.001;校正绝对风险差-1.1%,95% CI -1.3 ~ -0.8)。探索性四向中介分析显示,当未发生高血糖时,地塞米松相关的术后谵妄风险降低10.4%(无高血糖aOR 0.59, 95% CI 0.51-0.67; p < 0.001;高血糖aOR 0.85, 95% CI 0.68-1.07; p = 0.17)。解释:术中给药地塞米松与较低的术后谵妄风险相关,尽管这种关联在高血糖患者中并不明显。前瞻性研究应探讨地塞米松和优化血糖控制在预防谵妄中的作用。资助:J.和J. Buzen博士的无限制慈善基金。
{"title":"Association of intraoperative dexamethasone administration with postoperative delirium and the role of hyperglycaemia: a retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Sophia Riesemann, Theresa Tenge, Elena Ahrens, Luca J Wachtendorf, Béla-Simon Paschold, Denys Shay, Dario von Wedel, Kara Liebich, Justus P Student, Scott C Fligor, Lars Kaiser, Xiaohan Xu, Anastasia Katsiampoura, Linda Valeri, Victor Novack, Tara S Kent, Haobo Ma, Maximilian S Schaefer","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103771","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103771","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Postoperative delirium is a frequent, serious complication triggered by various factors including systemic inflammation. Dexamethasone, an inexpensive anti-inflammatory steroid frequently administered for prophylaxis of postoperative nausea and vomiting, attenuates inflammation. We hypothesised that intraoperative dexamethasone administration is associated with a lower risk of postoperative delirium and assessed whether this is modified by the occurrence of its key side effect, hyperglycaemia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study analysed electronic health data from adult hospitalised patients undergoing non-cardiac, non-neurosurgical, and non-transplant procedures at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (Boston, MA, USA) between January 1, 2008, and January 15, 2024. Patients with missing data, preoperative delirium or glucocorticoid use, mechanical ventilation for 72 h or more, and those not expected to survive without the procedure, were excluded. The primary exposure was intraoperative administration of intravenous dexamethasone. The primary outcome was 7-day postoperative delirium, identified by keyword-triggered manual discharge note reviews, diagnostic codes, and the Confusion Assessment Method. Hyperglycaemia was defined as peak 24-h postoperative blood glucose of more than 180 mg/dL. All analyses were adjusted for 43 patient-related and procedure-related variables.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>92,832 patients were included (55.8% female, median age 60 years [IQR 48-70]), of which 41,983 (45.2%) received dexamethasone at a median dose of 8 mg (IQR 4-8). 2575 (2.8%) patients developed postoperative delirium. Emergency procedures accounted for 11,970 (12.9%) of cases. Intraoperative administration of dexamethasone was associated with a lower risk of delirium (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.63, 95% CI 0.56-0.70; p < 0.001; adjusted absolute risk difference -1.1%, 95% CI -1.3 to -0.8). The exploratory four-way mediation analysis suggested a 10.4% greater dexamethasone-associated reduction of postoperative delirium risk when hyperglycaemia did not occur (no hyperglycaemia aOR 0.59, 95% CI 0.51-0.67; p < 0.001; hyperglycaemia aOR 0.85, 95% CI 0.68-1.07; p = 0.17).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Intraoperative dexamethasone administration is associated with a lower risk of postoperative delirium, although this association was not evident in patients experiencing hyperglycaemia. Prospective studies should investigate the role of dexamethasone and optimised blood glucose control in delirium prevention.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>Unrestricted philanthropic grant by Dr. J. and J. Buzen.</p>","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"92 ","pages":"103771"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12877809/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146141558","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-29eCollection Date: 2026-02-01DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103776
Mikko Uimonen, Matias Vaajala, Antti Saarinen, Rasmus Liukkonen, Oskari Pakarinen, Juho Laaksonen, Ville Ponkilainen, Ilari Kuitunen, Valtteri Panula
Background: Accumulation of score distribution towards the high end of the measurement scale is an important source of bias related patient-reported outcome measures (PROM). The aim was to evaluate how PROM score distributions, scale boundaries, and sampling variability influence the likelihood of detecting a minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of 10 points between surgical and non-surgical groups in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of musculoskeletal disorders.
Methods: We did a systematic review and meta-epidemiological analysis of 129 RCT studies comparing surgical and non-surgical interventions in patients with musculoskeletal complaints using a PROM as an outcome measure (1771 group-level PROM measurements) from PubMed and Scopus published until February 26, 2025. Simulations assessed each comparison's likelihood of detecting a difference of 10 points or more.
Findings: The mean difference between groups was 4.6 (SD 7.1) points favouring surgery, with surgical arms scoring higher in 72% of comparisons. The mean likelihood of detecting at least a 10-point difference was 19%, meaning fewer than one in five of such comparisons would detect a true difference. Detection likelihood peaked (35%) at a mean score of 70, declining toward scale extremes. Comparisons with significant observed differences (>10 points, p < 0.05) had a 54% likelihood versus 17% in non-significant comparisons, strongly linking detection likelihood to observed differences.
Interpretation: The majority of the PROM-based RCTs were unlikely to detect differences due to ceiling effects with a constant underestimation of surgical benefit. PROMs with adequate content coverage, better discrimination, and reduced ceiling susceptibility should be selected for clinical practice. Future research should align outcome selection and follow-up timing with expected treatment effects and ensure that measurement properties do not mask meaningful clinical differences.
{"title":"The sensitivity of patient-reported outcome measures in surgical and non-surgical care: a systematic review and meta-epidemiological evaluation of randomised controlled trials.","authors":"Mikko Uimonen, Matias Vaajala, Antti Saarinen, Rasmus Liukkonen, Oskari Pakarinen, Juho Laaksonen, Ville Ponkilainen, Ilari Kuitunen, Valtteri Panula","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103776","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103776","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Accumulation of score distribution towards the high end of the measurement scale is an important source of bias related patient-reported outcome measures (PROM). The aim was to evaluate how PROM score distributions, scale boundaries, and sampling variability influence the likelihood of detecting a minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of 10 points between surgical and non-surgical groups in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of musculoskeletal disorders.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We did a systematic review and meta-epidemiological analysis of 129 RCT studies comparing surgical and non-surgical interventions in patients with musculoskeletal complaints using a PROM as an outcome measure (1771 group-level PROM measurements) from PubMed and Scopus published until February 26, 2025. Simulations assessed each comparison's likelihood of detecting a difference of 10 points or more.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The mean difference between groups was 4.6 (SD 7.1) points favouring surgery, with surgical arms scoring higher in 72% of comparisons. The mean likelihood of detecting at least a 10-point difference was 19%, meaning fewer than one in five of such comparisons would detect a true difference. Detection likelihood peaked (35%) at a mean score of 70, declining toward scale extremes. Comparisons with significant observed differences (>10 points, p < 0.05) had a 54% likelihood versus 17% in non-significant comparisons, strongly linking detection likelihood to observed differences.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>The majority of the PROM-based RCTs were unlikely to detect differences due to ceiling effects with a constant underestimation of surgical benefit. PROMs with adequate content coverage, better discrimination, and reduced ceiling susceptibility should be selected for clinical practice. Future research should align outcome selection and follow-up timing with expected treatment effects and ensure that measurement properties do not mask meaningful clinical differences.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>None.</p>","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"92 ","pages":"103776"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12874346/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146141706","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gastric cancer (GC) with peritoneal dissemination remains a challenge with poor prognosis and limited treatment options. We aimed to compare solvent-based paclitaxel (sb-PTX) + ramucirumab (RAM) vs. nanoparticle-albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-PTX) + RAM as second-line therapy for unresectable or recurrent GC with peritoneal dissemination.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective, randomised, open-label, multicentre phase 2 trial was conducted at 58 centres within the West Japan Oncology Group (WJOG) in Japan. Eligible participants were patients with histologically-confirmed GC with peritoneal dissemination refractory or intolerant to first-line therapy. Patients were randomised 1:1 to receive sb-PTX + RAM or nab-PTX + RAM. Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS); key secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), safety, and protocol-specified biomarker analyses including the assessment of stromal caveolin-1 (Cav-1) expression by immunohistochemistry on archival tumour specimens. The data cutoff for the analysis presented herein was January 27, 2021. This trial was registered in the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCTs031180022).</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Between Oct 1, 2018, and Jan 27, 2020, 105 patients were assigned to sb-PTX + RAM (n = 53) or nab-PTX + RAM (n = 52). Median follow-up was 18.1 months. Median OS was 8.1 months with sb-PTX + RAM and 7.2 months with nab-PTX + RAM (HR [nab-PTX + RAM vs. sb-PTX + RAM], 0.960; 95% CI, 0.621-1.484; P = 0.631). Median PFS was 5.1 vs. 3.9 months (HR [nab-PTX + RAM vs. sb-PTX + RAM], 0.965; 95% CI, 0.642-1.450; P = 0.893). ORR was 20.7% vs. 20.0% (P = 0.993), and DCR was 77.4% vs. 63.5% (P = 0.150), with sb-PTX + RAM and nab-PTX + RAM. Grade≥3 neuropathy occurred in 7.5% with sb-PTX + RAM and 17.6% with nab-PTX + RAM, and febrile neutropenia in 11.3% vs. 5.9%. In biomarker analysis, OS and PFS improved stepwise with increasing Cav-1 expression in patients receiving nab-PTX + RAM (P = 0.007, P = 0.012); no such association was observed with sb-PTX + RAM. Among patients with high stromal Cav-1 expression (IHC score 3+), nab-PTX + RAM showed some evidence of improved OS compared with sb-PTX + RAM (HR [nab-PTX + RAM vs. sb-PTX + RAM], 0.371; 95% CI, 0.130-1.060; P = 0.055). The interaction between Cav-1 expression and treatment arm showed a non-significant trend (HR for interaction, 0.364; 95% CI, 0.115-1.152; P = 0.086), consistent with this finding.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Treatment with nab-PTX + RAM did not meet the prespecified threshold (HR < 0.90) for promising efficacy in patients with GC and peritoneal dissemination. High stromal Cav-1 expression was associated with improved efficacy of nab-PTX + RAM. Future studies should prospectively validate the predictive value of stromal Cav-1 in patients receiving nab-PTX + RAM.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>Taiho Ph
{"title":"Solvent-based or nab-paclitaxel plus ramucirumab for pretreated gastric cancer with peritoneal dissemination and prespecified biomarker analysis (P-SELECT/WJOG10617G): a randomised phase 2 trial in Japan.","authors":"Kenro Hirata, Yasuo Hamamoto, Hirokazu Shoji, Hiroki Hara, Chihiro Kondoh, Hisateru Yasui, Takeshi Kajiwara, Eishi Baba, Takayuki Ando, Naotoshi Sugimoto, Hisato Kawakami, Hiroo Katsuya, Michitaka Nagase, Yoshiyuki Yamamoto, Kenichi Yoshimura, Masahiko Ando, Chiyo K Imamura, Kentaro Yamazaki, Shuichi Hironaka, Kei Muro","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103768","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103768","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gastric cancer (GC) with peritoneal dissemination remains a challenge with poor prognosis and limited treatment options. We aimed to compare solvent-based paclitaxel (sb-PTX) + ramucirumab (RAM) vs. nanoparticle-albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-PTX) + RAM as second-line therapy for unresectable or recurrent GC with peritoneal dissemination.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective, randomised, open-label, multicentre phase 2 trial was conducted at 58 centres within the West Japan Oncology Group (WJOG) in Japan. Eligible participants were patients with histologically-confirmed GC with peritoneal dissemination refractory or intolerant to first-line therapy. Patients were randomised 1:1 to receive sb-PTX + RAM or nab-PTX + RAM. Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS); key secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), safety, and protocol-specified biomarker analyses including the assessment of stromal caveolin-1 (Cav-1) expression by immunohistochemistry on archival tumour specimens. The data cutoff for the analysis presented herein was January 27, 2021. This trial was registered in the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCTs031180022).</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Between Oct 1, 2018, and Jan 27, 2020, 105 patients were assigned to sb-PTX + RAM (n = 53) or nab-PTX + RAM (n = 52). Median follow-up was 18.1 months. Median OS was 8.1 months with sb-PTX + RAM and 7.2 months with nab-PTX + RAM (HR [nab-PTX + RAM vs. sb-PTX + RAM], 0.960; 95% CI, 0.621-1.484; P = 0.631). Median PFS was 5.1 vs. 3.9 months (HR [nab-PTX + RAM vs. sb-PTX + RAM], 0.965; 95% CI, 0.642-1.450; P = 0.893). ORR was 20.7% vs. 20.0% (P = 0.993), and DCR was 77.4% vs. 63.5% (P = 0.150), with sb-PTX + RAM and nab-PTX + RAM. Grade≥3 neuropathy occurred in 7.5% with sb-PTX + RAM and 17.6% with nab-PTX + RAM, and febrile neutropenia in 11.3% vs. 5.9%. In biomarker analysis, OS and PFS improved stepwise with increasing Cav-1 expression in patients receiving nab-PTX + RAM (P = 0.007, P = 0.012); no such association was observed with sb-PTX + RAM. Among patients with high stromal Cav-1 expression (IHC score 3+), nab-PTX + RAM showed some evidence of improved OS compared with sb-PTX + RAM (HR [nab-PTX + RAM vs. sb-PTX + RAM], 0.371; 95% CI, 0.130-1.060; P = 0.055). The interaction between Cav-1 expression and treatment arm showed a non-significant trend (HR for interaction, 0.364; 95% CI, 0.115-1.152; P = 0.086), consistent with this finding.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Treatment with nab-PTX + RAM did not meet the prespecified threshold (HR < 0.90) for promising efficacy in patients with GC and peritoneal dissemination. High stromal Cav-1 expression was associated with improved efficacy of nab-PTX + RAM. Future studies should prospectively validate the predictive value of stromal Cav-1 in patients receiving nab-PTX + RAM.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>Taiho Ph","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"92 ","pages":"103768"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12876630/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146141767","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-29eCollection Date: 2026-02-01DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103769
Jason Yun, Laura Brocklebank, Charlie Harper, Aiden Doherty
Background: The interaction between physical activity and sleep with cardiovascular disease remains poorly understood, despite both being key risk factors. This study investigated the independent and joint associations of device-measured step count and sleep duration with incident major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE).
Methods: Prospective analysis of UK Biobank participants who wore a wrist-based accelerometer for seven days between 2013 and 2015. Open-source machine learning algorithms derived daily step count and overnight sleep duration. The outcome was incident MACE (cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction or stroke, or revascularisation procedure), identified through electronic health record linkage. Cox proportional hazards models were used to examine independent and joint associations of median daily step count (low [<7500], intermediate [7500-11,000], high [>11,000]) and median overnight sleep duration (short [<6.5 h], intermediate [6.5-7.5 h], long [>7.5 h]) with incident MACE.
Findings: Among 88,012 participants (mean age 62.2 years [standard deviation, SD 7.8]), 3817 were diagnosed with MACE during follow-up (median 7.9 years [interquartile range, IQR 7.3-8.4]). Low step count and short sleep duration were independently associated with a higher risk of MACE, but there was no evidence of an interaction between step count and sleep duration (P for interaction = 0.42). Compared with the reference group-participants with high step count and intermediate sleep duration-the highest risk of MACE was observed in participants with both low step count and short sleep duration (hazard ratio, HR: 1.84, 95% CI: 1.62-2.10, p < 0.0001).
Interpretation: The results of this study show that higher daily step count does not fully attenuate the higher risk of cardiovascular disease associated with short sleep duration, reinforcing the importance of sufficient levels of both daily step count and sleep for the prevention of cardiovascular disease.
{"title":"Joint associations of device-measured step count and sleep duration with incident major adverse cardiovascular events: prospective analysis of the UK Biobank.","authors":"Jason Yun, Laura Brocklebank, Charlie Harper, Aiden Doherty","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103769","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103769","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The interaction between physical activity and sleep with cardiovascular disease remains poorly understood, despite both being key risk factors. This study investigated the independent and joint associations of device-measured step count and sleep duration with incident major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prospective analysis of UK Biobank participants who wore a wrist-based accelerometer for seven days between 2013 and 2015. Open-source machine learning algorithms derived daily step count and overnight sleep duration. The outcome was incident MACE (cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction or stroke, or revascularisation procedure), identified through electronic health record linkage. Cox proportional hazards models were used to examine independent and joint associations of median daily step count (low [<7500], intermediate [7500-11,000], high [>11,000]) and median overnight sleep duration (short [<6.5 h], intermediate [6.5-7.5 h], long [>7.5 h]) with incident MACE.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Among 88,012 participants (mean age 62.2 years [standard deviation, SD 7.8]), 3817 were diagnosed with MACE during follow-up (median 7.9 years [interquartile range, IQR 7.3-8.4]). Low step count and short sleep duration were independently associated with a higher risk of MACE, but there was no evidence of an interaction between step count and sleep duration (<i>P</i> for interaction = 0.42). Compared with the reference group-participants with high step count and intermediate sleep duration-the highest risk of MACE was observed in participants with both low step count and short sleep duration (hazard ratio, HR: 1.84, 95% CI: 1.62-2.10, <i>p</i> < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>The results of this study show that higher daily step count does not fully attenuate the higher risk of cardiovascular disease associated with short sleep duration, reinforcing the importance of sufficient levels of both daily step count and sleep for the prevention of cardiovascular disease.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>Wellcome Trust (223100/Z/21/Z).</p>","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"92 ","pages":"103769"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12876295/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146141593","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-29eCollection Date: 2026-02-01DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103767
Uzma N Sarwar, Jeffrey B Baker, Lisa Pereira, Barbara A Pahud, Jon Finley, David Strong, Sandra Pagnussat, Shyam Patel, Yanping Liu, Emma Shittu, Olympia Evdoxia Anastasiou, Elena V Kalinina, Kena A Swanson, Annaliesa S Anderson, Alejandra Gurtman, Iona Munjal
<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bivalent respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) prefusion F protein vaccine (RSVpreF) is currently available as a preservative-free, single-dose vial (SDV) presentation. RSVpreF offered in a multidose vial (MDV) may help reduce vaccination costs in lower-middle-income countries (LMICs). We aimed to evaluate the immunogenicity, safety, and tolerability of the RSVpreF MDV presentation compared with those of the SDV presentation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This phase 3, randomised, open-label, noninferiority study was conducted at six sites in the United States. Study recruitment occurred in June-August 2024, with follow-up to September 20, 2024. Healthy, nonpregnant, nonbreastfeeding female participants (aged 18-49 years) were randomly allocated (1:1), via an interactive response technology system, to receive intramuscular injection of either single-dose RSVpreF with preservative 2-phenoxyethanol (2-PE; MDV presentation [RSVpreF MDV]) or RSVpreF without 2-PE (SDV presentation [RSVpreF SDV]). The primary outcomes were demonstration of noninferior immunogenicity of RSVpreF MDV compared with RSVpreF SDV at 1 month after vaccination and safety profile comparisons. Noninferiority was declared if the lower 95% CI bound for the geometric mean ratio (GMR) of neutralising geometric mean titres (GMTs) of RSVpreF MDV to those for RSVpreF SDV was >0·67 (1·5-fold noninferiority margin) for both RSV A and RSV B. This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06473519) and is complete.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Between June 24, 2024, and August 2, 2024, 488 participants were enrolled, of whom 453 were randomly allocated to study groups, and 450 were vaccinated (RSVpreF MDV, n = 223; RSVpreF SDV, n = 227). The evaluable immunogenicity population was 434 participants (RSVpreF MDV, n = 218; RSVpreF SDV, n = 216). Participant demographic and baseline characteristics were similar across vaccination groups. Vaccination with RSVpreF MDV met prespecified criteria for immunologic noninferiority compared with RSVpreF SDV. GMRs comparing neutralising GMTs of RSVpreF MDV versus RSVpreF SDV 1 month after vaccination were 0·96 (95% CI, 0·84-1·10) for RSV A and 0·91 (0·79-1·06) for RSV B. Solicited local reactions and systemic events within 7 days after vaccination were similar across groups (RSVpreF MDV: 50%, 69%; RSVpreF SDV: 55%, 67%, respectively). Unsolicited adverse events, most of which were mild or moderate in severity, were also reported by similar percentages of participants across groups.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Immunogenicity, safety, and tolerability outcomes with RSVpreF MDV are similar to those for the currently licensed RSVpreF SDV presentation. Although this study had a short follow-up, excluded pregnant individuals, and was conducted outside of LMICs (where the MDV presentation is likely to have the greatest utility), our findings are encouraging and contribute to the broader body of evidence, includin
{"title":"Safety and immunogenicity of bivalent RSVpreF vaccine formulated in a multidose vial in healthy female participants in the USA: a multicentre, randomised, open-label, noninferiority phase 3 study.","authors":"Uzma N Sarwar, Jeffrey B Baker, Lisa Pereira, Barbara A Pahud, Jon Finley, David Strong, Sandra Pagnussat, Shyam Patel, Yanping Liu, Emma Shittu, Olympia Evdoxia Anastasiou, Elena V Kalinina, Kena A Swanson, Annaliesa S Anderson, Alejandra Gurtman, Iona Munjal","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103767","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103767","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bivalent respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) prefusion F protein vaccine (RSVpreF) is currently available as a preservative-free, single-dose vial (SDV) presentation. RSVpreF offered in a multidose vial (MDV) may help reduce vaccination costs in lower-middle-income countries (LMICs). We aimed to evaluate the immunogenicity, safety, and tolerability of the RSVpreF MDV presentation compared with those of the SDV presentation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This phase 3, randomised, open-label, noninferiority study was conducted at six sites in the United States. Study recruitment occurred in June-August 2024, with follow-up to September 20, 2024. Healthy, nonpregnant, nonbreastfeeding female participants (aged 18-49 years) were randomly allocated (1:1), via an interactive response technology system, to receive intramuscular injection of either single-dose RSVpreF with preservative 2-phenoxyethanol (2-PE; MDV presentation [RSVpreF MDV]) or RSVpreF without 2-PE (SDV presentation [RSVpreF SDV]). The primary outcomes were demonstration of noninferior immunogenicity of RSVpreF MDV compared with RSVpreF SDV at 1 month after vaccination and safety profile comparisons. Noninferiority was declared if the lower 95% CI bound for the geometric mean ratio (GMR) of neutralising geometric mean titres (GMTs) of RSVpreF MDV to those for RSVpreF SDV was >0·67 (1·5-fold noninferiority margin) for both RSV A and RSV B. This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06473519) and is complete.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Between June 24, 2024, and August 2, 2024, 488 participants were enrolled, of whom 453 were randomly allocated to study groups, and 450 were vaccinated (RSVpreF MDV, n = 223; RSVpreF SDV, n = 227). The evaluable immunogenicity population was 434 participants (RSVpreF MDV, n = 218; RSVpreF SDV, n = 216). Participant demographic and baseline characteristics were similar across vaccination groups. Vaccination with RSVpreF MDV met prespecified criteria for immunologic noninferiority compared with RSVpreF SDV. GMRs comparing neutralising GMTs of RSVpreF MDV versus RSVpreF SDV 1 month after vaccination were 0·96 (95% CI, 0·84-1·10) for RSV A and 0·91 (0·79-1·06) for RSV B. Solicited local reactions and systemic events within 7 days after vaccination were similar across groups (RSVpreF MDV: 50%, 69%; RSVpreF SDV: 55%, 67%, respectively). Unsolicited adverse events, most of which were mild or moderate in severity, were also reported by similar percentages of participants across groups.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Immunogenicity, safety, and tolerability outcomes with RSVpreF MDV are similar to those for the currently licensed RSVpreF SDV presentation. Although this study had a short follow-up, excluded pregnant individuals, and was conducted outside of LMICs (where the MDV presentation is likely to have the greatest utility), our findings are encouraging and contribute to the broader body of evidence, includin","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"92 ","pages":"103767"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12876666/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146141773","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-28eCollection Date: 2026-02-01DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103773
Tessa M I Haverkate, Daniella Brals, Egbal A B Abukaraig, Nathan Kapata, Pascalina Kapata-Chanda, Bruce Kirenga, Eveline Klinkenberg, Irwin Law, Llang B Maama-Maime, Sizulu Moyo, Joshua Obasanya, Elizeus Rutebemberwa, Logan Stuck, Edine Tiemersma, Frank Cobelens
Background: Knowledge about environmental and demographic determinants of tuberculosis is largely limited to studies with ecological designs. We explored the association between these determinants and tuberculosis prevalence in an individual participant dataset aggregated across seven African countries.
Methods: Data of nationally representative tuberculosis prevalence surveys (2012-2019) from highly endemic countries were supplemented with publicly accessible data at district level. Associations between individual-level diagnosis of bacteriologically confirmed tuberculosis and district-level environmental-demographic variables were investigated in generalised linear mixed-effects models accounting for the multi-level structure of the data.
Findings: Of 322,615 participants aged ≥15 years across 400 districts, 976 were newly diagnosed with tuberculosis (prevalence 183-638/100,000 across the countries). Living at latitude 7.6-14.6° (adjusted odds ratio, aOR 2.07, 95% confidence interval, 95% CI 1.48-2.90) or in higher population density (aOR 1.07 per percent increase in mean population density, 1.01-1.13), or urban districts (aOR 1.31, 1.11-1.54) were independently associated with higher prevalence. Living in distsricts above 900 m altitude (aOR 0.52, 0.32-0.84), with 50-100 mm precipitation (aOR 0.62, 0.46-0.84), or at higher temperature (aOR 0.93 per degree Celsius, 0.88-0.98) was independently associated with lower tuberculosis prevalence. No significant associations were observed with fine particulate matter (aOR 1.04, 0.70-1.54 for 20-40 μg/m3, 0.82, 0.44-1.53 for >40 μg/m3), solar radiation (aOR 1.04, 0.93-1.15) or International Wealth Index (aOR 1.01 (1.00-1.02).
Interpretation: Our results suggest that in high-burden African countries, some of the variation in tuberculosis prevalence can be explained by environmental and demographic factors that merit further investigation.
{"title":"Environmental-demographic determinants associated with tuberculosis prevalence in seven African countries: an aggregated dataset analysis.","authors":"Tessa M I Haverkate, Daniella Brals, Egbal A B Abukaraig, Nathan Kapata, Pascalina Kapata-Chanda, Bruce Kirenga, Eveline Klinkenberg, Irwin Law, Llang B Maama-Maime, Sizulu Moyo, Joshua Obasanya, Elizeus Rutebemberwa, Logan Stuck, Edine Tiemersma, Frank Cobelens","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103773","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103773","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Knowledge about environmental and demographic determinants of tuberculosis is largely limited to studies with ecological designs. We explored the association between these determinants and tuberculosis prevalence in an individual participant dataset aggregated across seven African countries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data of nationally representative tuberculosis prevalence surveys (2012-2019) from highly endemic countries were supplemented with publicly accessible data at district level. Associations between individual-level diagnosis of bacteriologically confirmed tuberculosis and district-level environmental-demographic variables were investigated in generalised linear mixed-effects models accounting for the multi-level structure of the data.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Of 322,615 participants aged ≥15 years across 400 districts, 976 were newly diagnosed with tuberculosis (prevalence 183-638/100,000 across the countries). Living at latitude 7.6-14.6° (adjusted odds ratio, aOR 2.07, 95% confidence interval, 95% CI 1.48-2.90) or in higher population density (aOR 1.07 per percent increase in mean population density, 1.01-1.13), or urban districts (aOR 1.31, 1.11-1.54) were independently associated with higher prevalence. Living in distsricts above 900 m altitude (aOR 0.52, 0.32-0.84), with 50-100 mm precipitation (aOR 0.62, 0.46-0.84), or at higher temperature (aOR 0.93 per degree Celsius, 0.88-0.98) was independently associated with lower tuberculosis prevalence. No significant associations were observed with fine particulate matter (aOR 1.04, 0.70-1.54 for 20-40 μg/m<sup>3</sup>, 0.82, 0.44-1.53 for >40 μg/m<sup>3</sup>), solar radiation (aOR 1.04, 0.93-1.15) or International Wealth Index (aOR 1.01 (1.00-1.02).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Our results suggest that in high-burden African countries, some of the variation in tuberculosis prevalence can be explained by environmental and demographic factors that merit further investigation.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>Mr Willem Bakhuys Roozeboom Foundation.</p>","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"92 ","pages":"103773"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12874274/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146141658","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-27eCollection Date: 2026-02-01DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103770
Julia A van den Broek, Antonius W Schurink, Brenda Leeneman, Tessa Brabander, Astrid A M van der Veldt, Cornelius Verhoef, Dirk J Grünhagen
Background: Neoadjuvant immunotherapy improves outcomes compared to adjuvant therapy in stage III melanoma and reduces costs when adjuvant therapy is omitted following a major pathological response (MPR). However, adjuvant therapy remains the sole systemic treatment for patients identified as stage III by sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). Detecting nodal metastases prior to this procedure could be beneficial.
Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the accuracy of preoperative ultrasound and fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) and the healthcare costs of implementing this strategy. PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were searched up to March 21, 2025. Diagnostic cohort studies were included when preoperative ultrasound and/or FNAC were performed in patients with cutaneous melanoma eligible for SLNB, with histopathological confirmation. Studies that lacked individual patient-level diagnostic data were excluded. Two reviewers independently screened and extracted data. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were calculated using bivariate or univariate random-effects models. The associated healthcare costs for each strategy were calculated using the pooled estimates, costs of the procedure, therapies and follow-up.
Findings: Of 1315 records screened, 19 diagnostic studies comprising 7396 patients were included. For ultrasound, pooled sensitivity was 33.6% (95% CI: 23.5-45.5%) and specificity 92.4% (87.3-95.6%). For FNAC, pooled sensitivity and specificity were 92.6% (15.9-99.9%) and 99.1% (96.6-99.8%). Most studies had unclear risk of bias in patient selection and index test domains, while applicability concerns were generally low. Substantial heterogeneity was observed across studies. Ultrasound-FNAC was estimated to detect approximately 31% (8/25.5) of nodal metastases preoperatively. Implementation of this strategy was cost saving across multiple scenarios where adjuvant immunotherapy was omitted following MPR.
Interpretation: Implementation of ultrasound-FNAC prior to sentinel lymph node biopsy enables neoadjuvant immunotherapy and is cost saving, indicating potential value in routine clinical practice.
Funding: None.
背景:与辅助治疗相比,新辅助免疫治疗改善了III期黑色素瘤的预后,并在主要病理反应(MPR)后省略辅助治疗时降低了成本。然而,对于通过前哨淋巴结活检(SLNB)确定为III期的患者,辅助治疗仍然是唯一的全身治疗。在此手术之前检测淋巴结转移可能是有益的。方法:我们进行了一项系统回顾和荟萃分析,以确定术前超声和细针穿刺细胞学(FNAC)的准确性以及实施该策略的医疗成本。PubMed, Embase和Web of Science被搜索到2025年3月21日。当对符合SLNB条件的皮肤黑色素瘤患者进行术前超声和/或FNAC检查并经组织病理学证实时,纳入诊断队列研究。缺乏个体患者诊断数据的研究被排除在外。两名审稿人独立筛选和提取数据。使用双变量或单变量随机效应模型计算合并敏感性和特异性。每种策略的相关医疗保健成本是使用合并估计、手术、治疗和随访的成本来计算的。结果:在筛选的1315份记录中,包括19项诊断研究,包括7396名患者。超声的综合敏感性为33.6% (95% CI: 23.5-45.5%),特异性为92.4%(87.3-95.6%)。FNAC的敏感性和特异性分别为92.6%(15.9-99.9%)和99.1%(96.6-99.8%)。大多数研究在患者选择和指标测试领域存在不明确的偏倚风险,而适用性问题普遍较低。研究中观察到大量的异质性。术前超声- fnac估计可检出约31%(8/25.5)的淋巴结转移。在MPR后省略辅助免疫治疗的多种情况下,该策略的实施节省了成本。解释:在前哨淋巴结活检之前实施超声- fnac可以进行新辅助免疫治疗并节省成本,表明在常规临床实践中的潜在价值。资金:没有。
{"title":"Preoperative ultrasound before sentinel lymph node biopsy in melanoma in the era of neoadjuvant treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic performance and cost analysis.","authors":"Julia A van den Broek, Antonius W Schurink, Brenda Leeneman, Tessa Brabander, Astrid A M van der Veldt, Cornelius Verhoef, Dirk J Grünhagen","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103770","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103770","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Neoadjuvant immunotherapy improves outcomes compared to adjuvant therapy in stage III melanoma and reduces costs when adjuvant therapy is omitted following a major pathological response (MPR). However, adjuvant therapy remains the sole systemic treatment for patients identified as stage III by sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). Detecting nodal metastases prior to this procedure could be beneficial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the accuracy of preoperative ultrasound and fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) and the healthcare costs of implementing this strategy. PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were searched up to March 21, 2025. Diagnostic cohort studies were included when preoperative ultrasound and/or FNAC were performed in patients with cutaneous melanoma eligible for SLNB, with histopathological confirmation. Studies that lacked individual patient-level diagnostic data were excluded. Two reviewers independently screened and extracted data. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were calculated using bivariate or univariate random-effects models. The associated healthcare costs for each strategy were calculated using the pooled estimates, costs of the procedure, therapies and follow-up.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Of 1315 records screened, 19 diagnostic studies comprising 7396 patients were included. For ultrasound, pooled sensitivity was 33.6% (95% CI: 23.5-45.5%) and specificity 92.4% (87.3-95.6%). For FNAC, pooled sensitivity and specificity were 92.6% (15.9-99.9%) and 99.1% (96.6-99.8%). Most studies had unclear risk of bias in patient selection and index test domains, while applicability concerns were generally low. Substantial heterogeneity was observed across studies. Ultrasound-FNAC was estimated to detect approximately 31% (8/25.5) of nodal metastases preoperatively. Implementation of this strategy was cost saving across multiple scenarios where adjuvant immunotherapy was omitted following MPR.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Implementation of ultrasound-FNAC prior to sentinel lymph node biopsy enables neoadjuvant immunotherapy and is cost saving, indicating potential value in routine clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>None.</p>","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"92 ","pages":"103770"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12865617/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146118219","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-27eCollection Date: 2026-02-01DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103763
Miriam Emmelheinz, Daniel Egle, Samira Abdel Azim, Angela Augustin, Florentina Baumgart, Benjamin Walch, Johannes Laimer, Emanuel Bruckmoser, Lisa-Maria Rossetti, Steffen Bayerschmidt, Christian Uprimny, Marjan Arvandi, Uwe Siebert, Christian Marth, Christine Brunner
Background: Patients with osseous metastatic breast cancer receive bone-modifying agents (BMAs) as part of their standard care. Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) is one of the most important toxicities of this class of drugs. MRONJ heavily impacts patients' quality of life and represents a major medical burden necessitating a discontinuation of treatment. Currently, the diagnosis of MRONJ is established upon the manifestation of clinical symptoms like exposed necrotic jawbone, pain, swelling or signs indicative of infection of the jaw. The objective of this study was to assess the potential of imaging modalities, specifically FDG-PET/CT (positron emission tomography with computed tomography) in the early detection of MRONJ.
Methods: This cohort study in Austria included all patients with metastatic breast cancer who were receiving denosumab and regular PET/CTs, diagnosed with MRONJ between 2000 and 2022 at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Innsbruck. For each of the patients in the study cohort, two control patients with comparable clinical characteristics were matched to serve as a control group. Control patients with metastasized breast cancer did not develop MRONJ but did receive denosumab and regular FDG-PET/CTs. Imaging data were independently assessed by two experienced nuclear medicine physicians.
Findings: Baseline characteristics were well balanced. Patients received 120 mg denosumab once per month subcutaneously without de-escalation of therapy. The median time to develop MRONJ was 23 months (range 5-71, lower Quartile (Q1), upper Quartile (Q3) 16, 40 months). Nuclear medicine physicians detected jaw alterations in 91% (19/21) of MRONJ cases (sensitivity, 95% CI: 70%-98.8%) and in 29% (12/42) of controls, corresponding to a specificity of 71% (30/42; 95% CI: 55%-84%). Median lead time of imaging by demonstrating lesion in the jaw was 238 days (range 11-1118, Q1, Q3 106,494) prior to MRONJ diagnosis. In 68% (13/19) of MRONJ cases the nuclear medicine physicians were able to predict the exact tooth location of MRONJ with a deviation of no more than two teeth.
Interpretation: The high sensitivity and negative predictive value of imaging for early detection of MRONJ underscore its significance for clinical practice. Given that the majority of patients receive regular PET/CTs, our results provide an excellent opportunity for early intervention when MRONJ is detected with a considerable lead time.
{"title":"Early detection of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) in patients with metastatic breast cancer using FDG-PET/CT scans.","authors":"Miriam Emmelheinz, Daniel Egle, Samira Abdel Azim, Angela Augustin, Florentina Baumgart, Benjamin Walch, Johannes Laimer, Emanuel Bruckmoser, Lisa-Maria Rossetti, Steffen Bayerschmidt, Christian Uprimny, Marjan Arvandi, Uwe Siebert, Christian Marth, Christine Brunner","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103763","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103763","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with osseous metastatic breast cancer receive bone-modifying agents (BMAs) as part of their standard care. Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) is one of the most important toxicities of this class of drugs. MRONJ heavily impacts patients' quality of life and represents a major medical burden necessitating a discontinuation of treatment. Currently, the diagnosis of MRONJ is established upon the manifestation of clinical symptoms like exposed necrotic jawbone, pain, swelling or signs indicative of infection of the jaw. The objective of this study was to assess the potential of imaging modalities, specifically FDG-PET/CT (positron emission tomography with computed tomography) in the early detection of MRONJ.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cohort study in Austria included all patients with metastatic breast cancer who were receiving denosumab and regular PET/CTs, diagnosed with MRONJ between 2000 and 2022 at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Innsbruck. For each of the patients in the study cohort, two control patients with comparable clinical characteristics were matched to serve as a control group. Control patients with metastasized breast cancer did not develop MRONJ but did receive denosumab and regular FDG-PET/CTs. Imaging data were independently assessed by two experienced nuclear medicine physicians.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Baseline characteristics were well balanced. Patients received 120 mg denosumab once per month subcutaneously without de-escalation of therapy. The median time to develop MRONJ was 23 months (range 5-71, lower Quartile (Q1), upper Quartile (Q3) 16, 40 months). Nuclear medicine physicians detected jaw alterations in 91% (19/21) of MRONJ cases (sensitivity, 95% CI: 70%-98.8%) and in 29% (12/42) of controls, corresponding to a specificity of 71% (30/42; 95% CI: 55%-84%). Median lead time of imaging by demonstrating lesion in the jaw was 238 days (range 11-1118, Q1, Q3 106,494) prior to MRONJ diagnosis. In 68% (13/19) of MRONJ cases the nuclear medicine physicians were able to predict the exact tooth location of MRONJ with a deviation of no more than two teeth.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>The high sensitivity and negative predictive value of imaging for early detection of MRONJ underscore its significance for clinical practice. Given that the majority of patients receive regular PET/CTs, our results provide an excellent opportunity for early intervention when MRONJ is detected with a considerable lead time.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>This study received no external funding.</p>","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"92 ","pages":"103763"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12865645/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146118193","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-23eCollection Date: 2026-02-01DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103761
Georgios Polychronidis, Maximilian C Joos, Daniela C Merz, Magdalena Holze, Eva Kalkum, Pascal Probst, Mohammed Al-Saeedi, Christoph W Michalski, Martin Loos, Thilo Hackert, Rosa Klotz
Background: With the recent publication of the first randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing robotic partial pancreatoduodenectomy (RPD) versus open partial pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD) now providing high-level evidence, this study aims to analyze the short-term outcomes of RPD versus OPD to answer the ongoing clinical debate regarding the advantages and limitations of RPD, particularly in terms of perioperative safety.
Methods: We searched Medline, Web of Science, and CENTRAL accessed last on 26th of November 2025 for prospective studies. The main outcome was 90-day mortality; secondary outcomes included complications, and short-term oncological outcomes (R0 resection rate), among others. A random-effects model was employed. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias-tool (RoB 2) for randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and the ROBINS-I-tool for comparative cohort trials (CCTs). The certainty of evidence was graded according to GRADE. (PROSPERO registration ID: CRD42024523577).
Findings: Out of a total of 7388 screened studies, 358 studies underwent full-text screening leading to inclusion of 7 studies (3 RCTs and 4 CCTs). No significant difference was observed between RPD and OPD for 90-day mortality [OR (95% CI) 1.07 (0.04, 29.40)], clinically relevant complications including postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF), or reoperation rates [OR (95% CI) 1.10 (0.47, 2.59)]. Lymph node yield, R0 resection rate, operative time and length of hospital stay were also not significantly different. However, readmission rates favored OPD [OR (95% CI) 1.22 (1.15, 1.28)], while there was a lower amount of intraoperative blood loss in RPD [SMD (95% CI) -0.98 (-1.65, -0.32)].
Interpretation: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, mortality following RPD was comparable to OPD. RPD has demonstrated similar rates for major complications and short-term oncological outcomes and can thus be equally recommended as OPD but this recommendation is limited to experienced, high-volume centers.
Funding: This systematic review and meta-analysis was investigator-initiated and did not receive additional funding.
{"title":"Non-inferiority of robotic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy - a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective non-randomized and randomized trials.","authors":"Georgios Polychronidis, Maximilian C Joos, Daniela C Merz, Magdalena Holze, Eva Kalkum, Pascal Probst, Mohammed Al-Saeedi, Christoph W Michalski, Martin Loos, Thilo Hackert, Rosa Klotz","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103761","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103761","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>With the recent publication of the first randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing robotic partial pancreatoduodenectomy (RPD) versus open partial pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD) now providing high-level evidence, this study aims to analyze the short-term outcomes of RPD versus OPD to answer the ongoing clinical debate regarding the advantages and limitations of RPD, particularly in terms of perioperative safety.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched Medline, Web of Science, and CENTRAL accessed last on 26th of November 2025 for prospective studies. The main outcome was 90-day mortality; secondary outcomes included complications, and short-term oncological outcomes (R0 resection rate), among others. A random-effects model was employed. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias-tool (RoB 2) for randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and the ROBINS-I-tool for comparative cohort trials (CCTs). The certainty of evidence was graded according to GRADE. (PROSPERO registration ID: CRD42024523577).</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Out of a total of 7388 screened studies, 358 studies underwent full-text screening leading to inclusion of 7 studies (3 RCTs and 4 CCTs). No significant difference was observed between RPD and OPD for 90-day mortality [OR (95% CI) 1.07 (0.04, 29.40)], clinically relevant complications including postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF), or reoperation rates [OR (95% CI) 1.10 (0.47, 2.59)]. Lymph node yield, R0 resection rate, operative time and length of hospital stay were also not significantly different. However, readmission rates favored OPD [OR (95% CI) 1.22 (1.15, 1.28)], while there was a lower amount of intraoperative blood loss in RPD [SMD (95% CI) -0.98 (-1.65, -0.32)].</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>In this systematic review and meta-analysis, mortality following RPD was comparable to OPD. RPD has demonstrated similar rates for major complications and short-term oncological outcomes and can thus be equally recommended as OPD but this recommendation is limited to experienced, high-volume centers.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis was investigator-initiated and did not receive additional funding.</p>","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"92 ","pages":"103761"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12860918/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146104274","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-23eCollection Date: 2026-01-01DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103777
eClinicalMedicine
{"title":"The concerning rise in hypertension among children and adolescents.","authors":"eClinicalMedicine","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103777","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103777","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"91 ","pages":"103777"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12853350/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146104225","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}