Cognitive Outcomes in Nonacute Patients With Schizophrenia Treated With Long-Acting Injectable Antipsychotics Versus Oral Antipsychotics.

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY American journal of therapeutics Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI:10.1097/MJT.0000000000001729
Paula Simina Petric, Andreea Teodorescu, Ana Aliana Miron, Mihnea Costin Manea, Petru Ifteni
{"title":"Cognitive Outcomes in Nonacute Patients With Schizophrenia Treated With Long-Acting Injectable Antipsychotics Versus Oral Antipsychotics.","authors":"Paula Simina Petric, Andreea Teodorescu, Ana Aliana Miron, Mihnea Costin Manea, Petru Ifteni","doi":"10.1097/MJT.0000000000001729","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with schizophrenia often face challenges related to cognitive function, affecting their daily functioning and overall quality of life. The choice of antipsychotic treatment may play a crucial role in determining cognitive outcomes.</p><p><strong>Study question: </strong>Our study aimed to investigate whether there was a difference in cognitive ability between the patients with schizophrenia receiving oral antipsychotics (OAP) versus long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAI-APs).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional study using analytical methods between January 1, 2020, and January 1, 2022. Participants were divided into 2 groups: patients undergoing treatment with OAP and patients undergoing treatment with LAI-AP. All participants underwent version A of Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia (BACS).</p><p><strong>Measures and outcomes: </strong>The primary objective was to compare cognitive function in patients with schizophrenia treated with LAI antipsychotics versus OAP using BACS. Primary outcome measures include overall BACS score, with secondary measures focusing on specific cognitive domains. This study contributes to the understanding of the cognitive effects of different antipsychotic formulations in schizophrenia treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Although there was a slightly higher intelligence quotient in the LAI-AP group (102.2 vs. 101.32, P = 0.5401), it was not statistically significant. Olanzapine was the most commonly prescribed antipsychotic, with 48% of patients in the LAI-AP group and 40% in the OAP group. The LAI-AP group outperformed in all BACS evaluations. The most notable difference was in the token motor task (57.78 ± 17.03 vs. 50.04 ± 18.82, P = 0.0335), while the Tower of London test showed the smallest difference (17.26 ± 2.61 vs. 15.48 ± 3.47, P = 0.0046). Regression analysis revealed no significant variance in intelligence quotient scores; however, a significant discrepancy in BACS scores was evident, favoring the LAI treatment for better cognitive outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of long-acting antipsychotic treatment in individuals with schizophrenia offers promising advantages in preserving cognitive function.</p>","PeriodicalId":7760,"journal":{"name":"American journal of therapeutics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MJT.0000000000001729","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patients with schizophrenia often face challenges related to cognitive function, affecting their daily functioning and overall quality of life. The choice of antipsychotic treatment may play a crucial role in determining cognitive outcomes.

Study question: Our study aimed to investigate whether there was a difference in cognitive ability between the patients with schizophrenia receiving oral antipsychotics (OAP) versus long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAI-APs).

Study design: We conducted a cross-sectional study using analytical methods between January 1, 2020, and January 1, 2022. Participants were divided into 2 groups: patients undergoing treatment with OAP and patients undergoing treatment with LAI-AP. All participants underwent version A of Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia (BACS).

Measures and outcomes: The primary objective was to compare cognitive function in patients with schizophrenia treated with LAI antipsychotics versus OAP using BACS. Primary outcome measures include overall BACS score, with secondary measures focusing on specific cognitive domains. This study contributes to the understanding of the cognitive effects of different antipsychotic formulations in schizophrenia treatment.

Results: Although there was a slightly higher intelligence quotient in the LAI-AP group (102.2 vs. 101.32, P = 0.5401), it was not statistically significant. Olanzapine was the most commonly prescribed antipsychotic, with 48% of patients in the LAI-AP group and 40% in the OAP group. The LAI-AP group outperformed in all BACS evaluations. The most notable difference was in the token motor task (57.78 ± 17.03 vs. 50.04 ± 18.82, P = 0.0335), while the Tower of London test showed the smallest difference (17.26 ± 2.61 vs. 15.48 ± 3.47, P = 0.0046). Regression analysis revealed no significant variance in intelligence quotient scores; however, a significant discrepancy in BACS scores was evident, favoring the LAI treatment for better cognitive outcomes.

Conclusions: The use of long-acting antipsychotic treatment in individuals with schizophrenia offers promising advantages in preserving cognitive function.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用长效注射型抗精神病药物与口服抗精神病药物治疗的非急性期精神分裂症患者的认知结果。
背景:精神分裂症患者经常面临与认知功能相关的挑战,这影响了他们的日常功能和整体生活质量。抗精神病治疗方法的选择可能在决定认知结果方面起着至关重要的作用:研究问题:我们的研究旨在探讨接受口服抗精神病药物(OAP)与长效注射抗精神病药物(LAI-APs)治疗的精神分裂症患者在认知能力方面是否存在差异:我们在 2020 年 1 月 1 日至 2022 年 1 月 1 日期间采用分析方法进行了一项横断面研究。参与者分为两组:接受 OAP 治疗的患者和接受 LAI-AP 治疗的患者。所有参与者都接受了 A 版精神分裂症认知简评(BACS):主要目的是通过BACS比较接受LAI抗精神病药物治疗的精神分裂症患者与接受OAP治疗的精神分裂症患者的认知功能。主要结果测量包括 BACS 总分,次要测量侧重于特定认知领域。这项研究有助于了解不同抗精神病药物配方对精神分裂症治疗的认知影响:尽管LAI-AP组的智商略高(102.2 vs. 101.32,P = 0.5401),但无统计学意义。奥氮平是最常用的处方抗精神病药,LAI-AP 组和 OAP 组分别有 48% 和 40% 的患者使用奥氮平。在所有BACS评估中,LAI-AP组的表现均优于其他组。最显著的差异是代币运动任务(57.78 ± 17.03 vs. 50.04 ± 18.82,P = 0.0335),而伦敦塔测试的差异最小(17.26 ± 2.61 vs. 15.48 ± 3.47,P = 0.0046)。回归分析表明,智商评分无明显差异;但BACS评分有明显差异,LAI治疗有利于获得更好的认知结果:结论:对精神分裂症患者使用长效抗精神病药物治疗在保护认知功能方面具有良好的前景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of therapeutics
American journal of therapeutics PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
9.50%
发文量
142
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: American Journal of Therapeutics is an indispensable resource for all prescribing physicians who want to access pharmacological developments in cardiology, infectious disease, oncology, anesthesiology, nephrology, toxicology, and psychotropics without having to sift through stacks of medical journals. The journal features original articles on the latest therapeutic approaches as well as critical articles on the drug approval process and therapeutic reviews covering pharmacokinetics, regulatory affairs, pediatric clinical pharmacology, hypertension, metabolism, and drug delivery systems.
期刊最新文献
Tofacitinib-Associated Demyelination and Bullous Pemphigoid. Successful Treatment of Mexiletine-Induced Methylprednisolone-Resistant DRESS Syndrome With TNF-α Inhibitor. Successful Treatment of Psoriasis With Apremilast in a Kidney Transplant Recipient. Targeted Therapy Outcomes in Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Systematic Review. Efficacy and Safety of Inhibitors of the Proximal Pathway of the Complement System in Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1