Interest of a Hospital-Based Geriatric Living Lab among Inpatients with Neurocognitive Disorders: The ALLEGRIA Cross-Sectional Study.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-04-29 DOI:10.1159/000538144
Frédéric Noublanche, Grégory Ben-Sadoun, Lena Carcreff, Jennifer Gautier, Philippe Allain, Cédric Annweiler
{"title":"Interest of a Hospital-Based Geriatric Living Lab among Inpatients with Neurocognitive Disorders: The ALLEGRIA Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Frédéric Noublanche, Grégory Ben-Sadoun, Lena Carcreff, Jennifer Gautier, Philippe Allain, Cédric Annweiler","doi":"10.1159/000538144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The objectives of this study were to determine the participation rates, levels of engagement, and abilities to answer User eXperience (UX) questionnaires according to the presence and severity of major neurocognitive disorders (MNCD) among participants involved in gerontechnological experimentations within a hospital-based geriatric clinical living lab.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cross-sectional analysis examining all consecutive geriatric patients involved in the Allegro living lab experimentations, separated according to the presence and severity of MNCD. Participation rates were assessed using the \"Task-Based Experiment\"-type User eXperience (TBE-UX). Participation was considered successful if patients fully completed the TBE-UX experimental procedure. Engagement level was characterized using a five-point scale: interactive, constructive, active, passive, and disengaged. The abilities to answer UX questionnaires were characterized using a five-point scale from \"no completion\" to \"completion in autonomy.\"</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>313 patients were included. All patients without MNCD and with mild MNCD fully completed the TBE-UX procedures. Their engagement behaviors were rather active and constructive. All patients without MNCD and 88% of those with mild MNCD were able to fully complete the UX questionnaires. 96.2% of the patients with moderate MNCD fully followed the TBE-UX procedures. Their engagement behaviors were mainly active or passive. 64.2% were able to fully complete the UX questionnaires. 76.5% of the patients with severe MNCD fully followed the TBE-UX procedures. Their engagement behaviors were mainly passive or disengaged. 35.3% were able to fully complete the UX questionnaires.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Living lab experimentations appear feasible with older adults, even with those with MNCD. Task support can be offered to those with severe MNCD.</p>","PeriodicalId":11126,"journal":{"name":"Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000538144","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The objectives of this study were to determine the participation rates, levels of engagement, and abilities to answer User eXperience (UX) questionnaires according to the presence and severity of major neurocognitive disorders (MNCD) among participants involved in gerontechnological experimentations within a hospital-based geriatric clinical living lab.

Methods: Cross-sectional analysis examining all consecutive geriatric patients involved in the Allegro living lab experimentations, separated according to the presence and severity of MNCD. Participation rates were assessed using the "Task-Based Experiment"-type User eXperience (TBE-UX). Participation was considered successful if patients fully completed the TBE-UX experimental procedure. Engagement level was characterized using a five-point scale: interactive, constructive, active, passive, and disengaged. The abilities to answer UX questionnaires were characterized using a five-point scale from "no completion" to "completion in autonomy."

Results: 313 patients were included. All patients without MNCD and with mild MNCD fully completed the TBE-UX procedures. Their engagement behaviors were rather active and constructive. All patients without MNCD and 88% of those with mild MNCD were able to fully complete the UX questionnaires. 96.2% of the patients with moderate MNCD fully followed the TBE-UX procedures. Their engagement behaviors were mainly active or passive. 64.2% were able to fully complete the UX questionnaires. 76.5% of the patients with severe MNCD fully followed the TBE-UX procedures. Their engagement behaviors were mainly passive or disengaged. 35.3% were able to fully complete the UX questionnaires.

Conclusion: Living lab experimentations appear feasible with older adults, even with those with MNCD. Task support can be offered to those with severe MNCD.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
神经认知障碍住院患者对医院老年生活实验室的兴趣:ALLEGRIA 横向研究。
简介本研究的目的是根据主要神经认知障碍(MNCD)的存在和严重程度,确定医院老年临床生活实验室中参与老年技术实验的参与者的参与率、参与程度和回答用户体验(UX)问卷的能力:横断面分析:对所有参与 Allegro 生活实验室实验的连续老年病人进行检查,根据是否存在重大神经认知障碍及其严重程度进行区分。使用 "任务型实验 "用户体验(TBE-UX)评估参与率。如果患者完全完成了 TBE-UX 实验程序,则认为参与成功。参与程度采用五级评分法:交互式、建设性、主动式、被动式和脱离式。回答用户体验问卷的能力采用五级评分法,从 "未完成 "到 "自主完成":共纳入 313 名患者。所有未患多发性神经营养不良和轻度多发性神经营养不良的患者都完全完成了 TBE-UX 程序。他们的参与行为相当积极和具有建设性。所有未患有多发性神经障碍的患者和 88% 的轻度多发性神经障碍患者都能完整填写用户体验问卷。96.2%的中度 MNCD 患者完全遵守了 TBE-UX 程序。他们的参与行为主要是主动或被动的。64.2%的患者能够完整填写用户体验问卷。76.5% 的重度 MNCD 患者完全遵循了 TBE-UX 程序。他们的参与行为主要是被动或不参与。35.3%的患者能够完全完成用户体验问卷:生活实验室实验对老年人似乎是可行的,即使是患有多发性神经功能障碍的老年人。可以为患有严重多动症的老年人提供任务支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: As a unique forum devoted exclusively to the study of cognitive dysfunction, ''Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders'' concentrates on Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease, Huntington’s chorea and other neurodegenerative diseases. The journal draws from diverse related research disciplines such as psychogeriatrics, neuropsychology, clinical neurology, morphology, physiology, genetic molecular biology, pathology, biochemistry, immunology, pharmacology and pharmaceutics. Strong emphasis is placed on the publication of research findings from animal studies which are complemented by clinical and therapeutic experience to give an overall appreciation of the field.
期刊最新文献
Toolkit to Examine Lifelike Language (TELL) v.2.0: Optimizing speech biomarkers of neurodegeneration. Current Advances in Computerised Cognitive Assessment for Mild Cognitive Impairment and Dementia in Older Adults: A systematic Review. Risperidone for the Treatment of Dementia-Related Psychosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Differential Item Functioning and Clinical Utility of the Subjective Memory Complaints Questionnaire in a Multi-Ethnic Cohort. Efficacy of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors in the logopenic variant of primary progressive aphasia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1