Breastfeeding Barriers for Preterm Infants in Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Environments: A Systematic Assessment and Meta-Analysis.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Breastfeeding Medicine Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-04-26 DOI:10.1089/bfm.2024.0041
Chuntian Liu, Mengqing Pan, Xiaoyu Lu, Ying Gao, Jianhong Xu, Xiaochun Chen
{"title":"Breastfeeding Barriers for Preterm Infants in Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Environments: A Systematic Assessment and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Chuntian Liu, Mengqing Pan, Xiaoyu Lu, Ying Gao, Jianhong Xu, Xiaochun Chen","doi":"10.1089/bfm.2024.0041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Breast milk is vital for the growth and development of preterm infants. However, in Neonatal Intensive Care Units (NICUs), mothers often encounter significant challenges in breastfeeding. <b><i>Objective:</i></b> This study aims to systematically evaluate the barriers to breastfeeding in NICUs, thereby providing evidence-based support for clinical practices. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A comprehensive search was conducted in the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Scopus databases, up to September 2023. Meta-analysis was performed using Stata 15.0, applying fixed or random effects models to calculate odds ratios (OR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI). Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for cases and cohorts and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality standards for cross-sectional studies. Heterogeneity was evaluated using Cochran's chi-squared test (Cochran's Q) and <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> statistics, and publication bias was assessed through funnel plots and symmetry tests. <b><i>Results:</i></b> A total of 32 studies were included, encompassing 96,053 preterm infants. The main barriers to breastfeeding in preterm infants included: low gestational age (OR = 1.36, 95% CI: 1.06-1.75), lower maternal education (OR = 1.64, 95% CI: 1.39-1.93), insufficient breast milk (OR = 2.09, 95% CI: 1.39-1.93), multiple births (OR = 1.615, 95% CI: 1.18-2.210), smoking (OR = 2.906, 95% CI: 2.239-3.771), and single motherhood (OR = 1.439, 95% CI: 1.251-1.654). <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> This study underscores the need for individualized breastfeeding support strategies in NICUs, taking into account the diverse backgrounds of mothers. Future research should focus on unraveling the underlying mechanisms affecting breastfeeding in preterm infants, with the goal of enhancing breastfeeding rates and improving developmental outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":9142,"journal":{"name":"Breastfeeding Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"505-514"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breastfeeding Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/bfm.2024.0041","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Breast milk is vital for the growth and development of preterm infants. However, in Neonatal Intensive Care Units (NICUs), mothers often encounter significant challenges in breastfeeding. Objective: This study aims to systematically evaluate the barriers to breastfeeding in NICUs, thereby providing evidence-based support for clinical practices. Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted in the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Scopus databases, up to September 2023. Meta-analysis was performed using Stata 15.0, applying fixed or random effects models to calculate odds ratios (OR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI). Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for cases and cohorts and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality standards for cross-sectional studies. Heterogeneity was evaluated using Cochran's chi-squared test (Cochran's Q) and I2 statistics, and publication bias was assessed through funnel plots and symmetry tests. Results: A total of 32 studies were included, encompassing 96,053 preterm infants. The main barriers to breastfeeding in preterm infants included: low gestational age (OR = 1.36, 95% CI: 1.06-1.75), lower maternal education (OR = 1.64, 95% CI: 1.39-1.93), insufficient breast milk (OR = 2.09, 95% CI: 1.39-1.93), multiple births (OR = 1.615, 95% CI: 1.18-2.210), smoking (OR = 2.906, 95% CI: 2.239-3.771), and single motherhood (OR = 1.439, 95% CI: 1.251-1.654). Conclusion: This study underscores the need for individualized breastfeeding support strategies in NICUs, taking into account the diverse backgrounds of mothers. Future research should focus on unraveling the underlying mechanisms affecting breastfeeding in preterm infants, with the goal of enhancing breastfeeding rates and improving developmental outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新生儿重症监护室环境中早产儿的母乳喂养障碍:系统评估与元分析》。
背景:母乳对早产儿的生长发育至关重要。然而,在新生儿重症监护室(NICU)中,母亲在母乳喂养方面往往会遇到巨大的挑战。研究目的本研究旨在系统评估新生儿重症监护室中母乳喂养的障碍,从而为临床实践提供循证支持。研究方法在 Cochrane Library、PubMed、Web of Science、Embase 和 Scopus 数据库中进行了全面检索,检索时间截至 2023 年 9 月。使用Stata 15.0进行Meta分析,采用固定或随机效应模型计算几率比(OR)及其95%置信区间(CI)。对于病例和队列研究,采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表进行研究质量评估;对于横断面研究,采用美国医疗保健研究与质量机构标准进行评估。异质性采用科克伦卡方检验(Cochran's Q)和I2统计量进行评估,发表偏倚采用漏斗图和对称性检验进行评估。结果共纳入32项研究,涉及96 053名早产儿。早产儿母乳喂养的主要障碍包括:胎龄低(OR = 1.36,95% CI:1.06-1.75)、母亲受教育程度低(OR = 1.64,95% CI:1.39-1.93)、母乳不足(OR = 2.09,95% CI:1.39-1.93)、多产(OR = 1.615,95% CI:1.18-2.210)、吸烟(OR = 2.906,95% CI:2.239-3.771)和单亲母亲(OR = 1.439,95% CI:1.251-1.654)。结论本研究强调了在新生儿重症监护病房采取个性化母乳喂养支持策略的必要性,同时考虑到了母亲的不同背景。未来的研究应侧重于揭示影响早产儿母乳喂养的潜在机制,以提高母乳喂养率和改善发育结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Breastfeeding Medicine
Breastfeeding Medicine OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-PEDIATRICS
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
11.10%
发文量
130
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Breastfeeding Medicine provides unparalleled peer-reviewed research, protocols, and clinical applications to ensure optimal care for mother and infant. The Journal answers the growing demand for evidence-based research and explores the immediate and long-term outcomes of breastfeeding, including its epidemiologic, physiologic, and psychological benefits. It is the exclusive source of the Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine protocols. Breastfeeding Medicine coverage includes: Breastfeeding recommendations and protocols Health consequences of artificial feeding Physiology of lactation and biochemistry of breast milk Optimal nutrition for the breastfeeding mother Breastfeeding indications and contraindications Managing breastfeeding discomfort, pain, and other complications Breastfeeding the premature or sick infant Breastfeeding in the chronically ill mother Management of the breastfeeding mother on medication Infectious disease transmission through breast milk and breastfeeding The collection and storage of human milk and human milk banking Measuring the impact of being a “baby-friendly” hospital Cultural competence and cultural sensitivity International public health issues including social and economic issues.
期刊最新文献
Donor Human Milk Fat Content Is Associated with Maternal Body Mass Index. A Testimony to Dr. Ruth A. Lawrence: An Elegant Revolutionary. Lactation Support for Breastfeeding and Chestfeeding People with HIV: A Call for Research to Examine Telelactation Experience, HIV Knowledge, and Lactation Consultants' Attitudes Related to Infant Feeding with HIV. How Workplaces Should Design Lactation Rooms: A Wishlist Informed by Clinical Practice, Maternal Health Research, and Personal Experience as a Breastfeeding Mom. Human Migration and Breastfeeding Practices.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1