Self-management eHealth solutions for menopause - a systematic scoping review.

IF 2.9 4区医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Climacteric Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-04-29 DOI:10.1080/13697137.2024.2334035

Sabrina Vollrath, Susanne Theis, Argyrios Kolokythas, Heidrun Janka, Sarah Schleich, Jens Moreth, Ludwig Kiesel, Petra Stute

{"title":"Self-management eHealth solutions for menopause - a systematic scoping review.","authors":"Sabrina Vollrath, Susanne Theis, Argyrios Kolokythas, Heidrun Janka, Sarah Schleich, Jens Moreth, Ludwig Kiesel, Petra Stute","doi":"10.1080/13697137.2024.2334035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The purpose of this scoping review was to highlight the current scientific evidence on eHealth-based information tools for menopause in terms of quality, requirements and previous intervention outcomes.Methods: We systematically searched electronic databases (Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Global Health Database [Ovid], Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov [NLM], LIVIVO Search Portal [ZB MED] and Google Scholar) from 1974 to March 2022 for relevant records.Results: Our search yielded 1773 records, of which 28 met our inclusion criteria. Thirteen of 28 selected studies were cross-sectional with qualitative content analysis of websites about menopause; 9 studies were cohort studies examining the impact of an eHealth intervention; two studies were randomized controlled trials comparing eHealth tools with conventional ones; and four studies were non-systematic literature reviews.Conclusion: This scoping review highlights the potential of eHealth-based information tools for the management of menopause and shows that most eHealth-based information tools are inadequate in terms of readability and the balanced view on information. Providers of eHealth-based information tools should pay attention to a participatory design, readability, balance of content and the use of multimedia tools for information delivery to improve understanding.","PeriodicalId":10213,"journal":{"name":"Climacteric","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Climacteric","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13697137.2024.2334035","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this scoping review was to highlight the current scientific evidence on eHealth-based information tools for menopause in terms of quality, requirements and previous intervention outcomes.

Methods: We systematically searched electronic databases (Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Global Health Database [Ovid], Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov [NLM], LIVIVO Search Portal [ZB MED] and Google Scholar) from 1974 to March 2022 for relevant records.

Results: Our search yielded 1773 records, of which 28 met our inclusion criteria. Thirteen of 28 selected studies were cross-sectional with qualitative content analysis of websites about menopause; 9 studies were cohort studies examining the impact of an eHealth intervention; two studies were randomized controlled trials comparing eHealth tools with conventional ones; and four studies were non-systematic literature reviews.

Conclusion: This scoping review highlights the potential of eHealth-based information tools for the management of menopause and shows that most eHealth-based information tools are inadequate in terms of readability and the balanced view on information. Providers of eHealth-based information tools should pay attention to a participatory design, readability, balance of content and the use of multimedia tools for information delivery to improve understanding.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

更年期自我管理电子健康解决方案--系统性范围界定审查。

目的本范围综述旨在从质量、要求和以往的干预结果等方面强调目前有关基于电子健康的更年期信息工具的科学证据：我们系统地检索了 1974 年至 2022 年 3 月期间的电子数据库（Embase、CINAHL、Cochrane 图书馆、全球健康数据库 [Ovid]、Web of Science、ClinicalTrials.gov [NLM]、LIVIVO Search Portal [ZB MED] 和 Google Scholar）中的相关记录：我们的搜索共获得 1773 条记录，其中 28 条符合我们的纳入标准。所选的 28 项研究中有 13 项是对有关更年期的网站进行定性内容分析的横断面研究；9 项研究是考察电子健康干预措施影响的队列研究；2 项研究是比较电子健康工具与传统工具的随机对照试验；4 项研究是非系统性文献综述：本范围综述强调了基于电子健康的信息工具在更年期管理方面的潜力，并表明大多数基于电子健康的信息工具在可读性和信息平衡方面存在不足。电子健康信息工具的提供者应注意参与式设计、可读性、内容平衡以及使用多媒体工具提供信息，以提高对信息的理解。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Climacteric 医学-妇产科学

CiteScore

1.70

自引率

7.10%

发文量

审稿时长

1 months

期刊介绍： Climacteric is the official journal of the International Menopause Society (IMS). As an international peer-reviewed journal it publishes original research and reviews of all aspects of aging in women. Climacteric was founded by the IMS in 1998 and today has become a leading journal in the publication of peer-reviewed papers on the menopause, climacteric and mid-life health. Topics covered include endocrine changes, symptoms attributed to the menopause and their treatment, hormone replacement and alternative therapies, lifestyles, and the counselling and education of peri- and postmenopausal women. Climacteric, published bimonthly, also features regular invited reviews, editorials and commentaries on recent developments. The editorial review board of Climacteric includes leading scientific and clinical experts in the field of midlife medicine and research and is headed by its Editor-in-Chief, Professor Rod Baber of Australia. He and his team of Associate Editors act independently to set a clear editorial policy, co-ordinate peer review, and ensure a rapid response to submitted papers.