Ju Liang, Huiying Zeng, Yuting Zhang, Wenbing Zhou, Naidong Xiao
{"title":"Higher efficiency of vanadate iron in heterogeneous Fenton-like systems to pretreat sugarcane bagasse and its enzymatic saccharification.","authors":"Ju Liang, Huiying Zeng, Yuting Zhang, Wenbing Zhou, Naidong Xiao","doi":"10.1002/bit.28733","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pretreatment is crucial for effective enzymatic saccharification of lignocellulose such as sugarcane bagasse (SCB). In the present study, SCB was pretreated with five kinds of heterogeneous Fenton-like systems (HFSs), respectively, in which α-FeOOH, α-Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>, Fe<sub>3</sub>O<sub>4</sub>, and FeS<sub>2</sub> worked as four traditional heterogeneous Fenton-like catalysts (HFCs), while FeVO<sub>4</sub> worked as a novel HFC. The enzymatic reducing sugar conversion rate was then compared among SCB after different heterogeneous Fenton-like pretreatments (HFPs), and the optimal HFS and pretreatment conditions were determined. The mechanism underlying the difference in saccharification efficiency was elucidated by analyzing the composition and morphology of SCB. Moreover, the ion dissolution characteristics, variation of pH and Eh values, H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> and hydroxyl radical (·OH) concentration of FeVO<sub>4</sub> and α-Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> HFSs were compared. The results revealed that the sugar conversion rate of SCB pretreated with FeVO<sub>4</sub> HFS reached up to 58.25%, which was obviously higher than that under other HFPs. In addition, the surface morphology and composition of the pretreated SCB with FeVO<sub>4</sub> HFS were more conducive to enzymatic saccharification. Compared with α-Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>, FeVO<sub>4</sub> could utilize H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> more efficiently, since the dissolved Fe<sup>3+</sup> and V<sup>5+</sup> can both react with H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> to produce more ·OH, resulting in a higher hemicellulose and lignin removal rate and a higher enzymatic sugar conversion rate. It can be concluded that FeVO<sub>4</sub> HFP is a promising approach for lignocellulose pretreatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":9168,"journal":{"name":"Biotechnology and Bioengineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biotechnology and Bioengineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.28733","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Pretreatment is crucial for effective enzymatic saccharification of lignocellulose such as sugarcane bagasse (SCB). In the present study, SCB was pretreated with five kinds of heterogeneous Fenton-like systems (HFSs), respectively, in which α-FeOOH, α-Fe2O3, Fe3O4, and FeS2 worked as four traditional heterogeneous Fenton-like catalysts (HFCs), while FeVO4 worked as a novel HFC. The enzymatic reducing sugar conversion rate was then compared among SCB after different heterogeneous Fenton-like pretreatments (HFPs), and the optimal HFS and pretreatment conditions were determined. The mechanism underlying the difference in saccharification efficiency was elucidated by analyzing the composition and morphology of SCB. Moreover, the ion dissolution characteristics, variation of pH and Eh values, H2O2 and hydroxyl radical (·OH) concentration of FeVO4 and α-Fe2O3 HFSs were compared. The results revealed that the sugar conversion rate of SCB pretreated with FeVO4 HFS reached up to 58.25%, which was obviously higher than that under other HFPs. In addition, the surface morphology and composition of the pretreated SCB with FeVO4 HFS were more conducive to enzymatic saccharification. Compared with α-Fe2O3, FeVO4 could utilize H2O2 more efficiently, since the dissolved Fe3+ and V5+ can both react with H2O2 to produce more ·OH, resulting in a higher hemicellulose and lignin removal rate and a higher enzymatic sugar conversion rate. It can be concluded that FeVO4 HFP is a promising approach for lignocellulose pretreatment.
期刊介绍:
Biotechnology & Bioengineering publishes Perspectives, Articles, Reviews, Mini-Reviews, and Communications to the Editor that embrace all aspects of biotechnology. These include:
-Enzyme systems and their applications, including enzyme reactors, purification, and applied aspects of protein engineering
-Animal-cell biotechnology, including media development
-Applied aspects of cellular physiology, metabolism, and energetics
-Biocatalysis and applied enzymology, including enzyme reactors, protein engineering, and nanobiotechnology
-Biothermodynamics
-Biofuels, including biomass and renewable resource engineering
-Biomaterials, including delivery systems and materials for tissue engineering
-Bioprocess engineering, including kinetics and modeling of biological systems, transport phenomena in bioreactors, bioreactor design, monitoring, and control
-Biosensors and instrumentation
-Computational and systems biology, including bioinformatics and genomic/proteomic studies
-Environmental biotechnology, including biofilms, algal systems, and bioremediation
-Metabolic and cellular engineering
-Plant-cell biotechnology
-Spectroscopic and other analytical techniques for biotechnological applications
-Synthetic biology
-Tissue engineering, stem-cell bioengineering, regenerative medicine, gene therapy and delivery systems
The editors will consider papers for publication based on novelty, their immediate or future impact on biotechnological processes, and their contribution to the advancement of biochemical engineering science. Submission of papers dealing with routine aspects of bioprocessing, description of established equipment, and routine applications of established methodologies (e.g., control strategies, modeling, experimental methods) is discouraged. Theoretical papers will be judged based on the novelty of the approach and their potential impact, or on their novel capability to predict and elucidate experimental observations.