Comparative assessment of established and deep learning-based segmentation methods for hippocampal volume estimation in brain magnetic resonance imaging analysis.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 BIOPHYSICS NMR in Biomedicine Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-07 DOI:10.1002/nbm.5169
Hsi-Chun Wang, Chia-Sho Chen, Chung-Chin Kuo, Teng-Yi Huang, Kuei-Hong Kuo, Tzu-Chao Chuang, Yi-Ru Lin, Hsiao-Wen Chung
{"title":"Comparative assessment of established and deep learning-based segmentation methods for hippocampal volume estimation in brain magnetic resonance imaging analysis.","authors":"Hsi-Chun Wang, Chia-Sho Chen, Chung-Chin Kuo, Teng-Yi Huang, Kuei-Hong Kuo, Tzu-Chao Chuang, Yi-Ru Lin, Hsiao-Wen Chung","doi":"10.1002/nbm.5169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this study, our objective was to assess the performance of two deep learning-based hippocampal segmentation methods, SynthSeg and TigerBx, which are readily available to the public. We contrasted their performance with that of two established techniques, FreeSurfer-Aseg and FSL-FIRST, using three-dimensional T1-weighted MRI scans (n = 1447) procured from public databases. Our evaluation focused on the accuracy and reproducibility of these tools in estimating hippocampal volume. The findings suggest that both SynthSeg and TigerBx are on a par with Aseg and FIRST in terms of segmentation accuracy and reproducibility, but offer a significant advantage in processing speed, generating results in less than 1 min compared with several minutes to hours for the latter tools. In terms of Alzheimer's disease classification based on the hippocampal atrophy rate, SynthSeg and TigerBx exhibited superior performance. In conclusion, we evaluated the capabilities of two deep learning-based segmentation techniques. The results underscore their potential value in clinical and research environments, particularly when investigating neurological conditions associated with hippocampal structures.</p>","PeriodicalId":19309,"journal":{"name":"NMR in Biomedicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NMR in Biomedicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nbm.5169","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this study, our objective was to assess the performance of two deep learning-based hippocampal segmentation methods, SynthSeg and TigerBx, which are readily available to the public. We contrasted their performance with that of two established techniques, FreeSurfer-Aseg and FSL-FIRST, using three-dimensional T1-weighted MRI scans (n = 1447) procured from public databases. Our evaluation focused on the accuracy and reproducibility of these tools in estimating hippocampal volume. The findings suggest that both SynthSeg and TigerBx are on a par with Aseg and FIRST in terms of segmentation accuracy and reproducibility, but offer a significant advantage in processing speed, generating results in less than 1 min compared with several minutes to hours for the latter tools. In terms of Alzheimer's disease classification based on the hippocampal atrophy rate, SynthSeg and TigerBx exhibited superior performance. In conclusion, we evaluated the capabilities of two deep learning-based segmentation techniques. The results underscore their potential value in clinical and research environments, particularly when investigating neurological conditions associated with hippocampal structures.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对脑磁共振成像分析中海马体积估算的成熟分割方法和基于深度学习的分割方法进行比较评估。
在本研究中,我们的目标是评估两种基于深度学习的海马体分割方法 SynthSeg 和 TigerBx 的性能。我们使用从公共数据库中获取的三维 T1 加权磁共振成像扫描结果(n = 1447),将这两种方法的性能与 FreeSurfer-Aseg 和 FSL-FIRST 这两种成熟技术的性能进行了对比。我们的评估重点是这些工具在估算海马体积方面的准确性和可重复性。研究结果表明,SynthSeg 和 TigerBx 在分割准确性和可重复性方面与 Aseg 和 FIRST 不相上下,但在处理速度上有明显优势,不到 1 分钟就能生成结果,而后者需要数分钟至数小时。在根据海马体萎缩率进行阿尔茨海默病分类方面,SynthSeg 和 TigerBx 表现出更优越的性能。总之,我们评估了两种基于深度学习的分割技术的能力。结果凸显了它们在临床和研究环境中的潜在价值,尤其是在研究与海马结构相关的神经疾病时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
NMR in Biomedicine
NMR in Biomedicine 医学-光谱学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
10.30%
发文量
209
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: NMR in Biomedicine is a journal devoted to the publication of original full-length papers, rapid communications and review articles describing the development of magnetic resonance spectroscopy or imaging methods or their use to investigate physiological, biochemical, biophysical or medical problems. Topics for submitted papers should be in one of the following general categories: (a) development of methods and instrumentation for MR of biological systems; (b) studies of normal or diseased organs, tissues or cells; (c) diagnosis or treatment of disease. Reports may cover work on patients or healthy human subjects, in vivo animal experiments, studies of isolated organs or cultured cells, analysis of tissue extracts, NMR theory, experimental techniques, or instrumentation.
期刊最新文献
Measuring cerebral enzymatic activity, brain pH and extracranial muscle metabolism with hyperpolarized 13C-pyruvate. Fractal dimension and lacunarity measures of glioma subcomponents are discriminative of the grade of gliomas and IDH status. Influence of echo time on pulmonary ventilation and perfusion derived by phase-resolved functional lung (PREFUL) MRI using multi-echo ultrashort echo time acquisition. Validation of an ultrahigh contrast divided subtracted inversion recovery technique using a standard T1 phantom. Accelerated 2D radial Look-Locker T1 mapping using a deep learning-based rapid inversion recovery sampling technique.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1