Medical management and surgery versus medical management alone for symptomatic cerebral cavernous malformation (CARE): a feasibility study and randomised, open, pragmatic, pilot phase trial.

IF 46.5 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Lancet Neurology Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-04-18 DOI:10.1016/S1474-4422(24)00096-6
{"title":"Medical management and surgery versus medical management alone for symptomatic cerebral cavernous malformation (CARE): a feasibility study and randomised, open, pragmatic, pilot phase trial.","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/S1474-4422(24)00096-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The highest priority uncertainty for people with symptomatic cerebral cavernous malformation is whether to have medical management and surgery or medical management alone. We conducted a pilot phase randomised controlled trial to assess the feasibility of addressing this uncertainty in a definitive trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The CARE pilot trial was a prospective, randomised, open-label, assessor-blinded, parallel-group trial at neuroscience centres in the UK and Ireland. We aimed to recruit 60 people of any age, sex, and ethnicity who had mental capacity, were resident in the UK or Ireland, and had a symptomatic cerebral cavernous malformation. Computerised, web-based randomisation assigned participants (1:1) to medical management and surgery (neurosurgical resection or stereotactic radiosurgery) or medical management alone, stratified by the neurosurgeon's and participant's consensus about the intended type of surgery before randomisation. Assignment was open to investigators, participants, and carers, but not clinical outcome event adjudicators. Feasibility outcomes included site engagement, recruitment, choice of surgical management, retention, adherence, data quality, clinical outcome event rate, and protocol implementation. The primary clinical outcome was symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage or new persistent or progressive non-haemorrhagic focal neurological deficit due to cerebral cavernous malformation or surgery during at least 6 months of follow-up. We analysed data from all randomly assigned participants according to assigned management. This trial is registered with ISRCTN (ISRCTN41647111) and has been completed.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Between Sept 27, 2021, and April 28, 2023, 28 (70%) of 40 sites took part, at which investigators screened 511 patients, of whom 322 (63%) were eligible, 202 were approached for recruitment, and 96 had collective uncertainty with their neurosurgeon about whether to have surgery for a symptomatic cerebral cavernous malformation. 72 (22%) of 322 eligible patients were randomly assigned (mean recruitment rate 0·2 [SD 0·25] participants per site per month) at a median of 287 (IQR 67-591) days since the most recent symptomatic presentation. Participants' median age was 50·6 (IQR 38·6-59·2) years, 68 (94%) of 72 participants were adults, 41 (57%) were female, 66 (92%) were White, 56 (78%) had a previous intracranial haemorrhage, and 28 (39%) had a previous epileptic seizure. The intended type of surgery before randomisation was neurosurgical resection for 19 (26%) of 72, stereotactic radiosurgery for 44 (61%), and no preference for nine (13%). Baseline clinical and imaging data were complete for all participants. 36 participants were randomly assigned to medical management and surgery (12 to neurosurgical resection and 24 to stereotactic radiosurgery) and 36 to medical management alone. Three (4%) of 72 participants withdrew, one was lost to follow-up, and one declined face-to-face follow-up, leaving 67 (93%) retained at 6-months' clinical follow-up. 61 (91%) of 67 participants with follow-up adhered to the assigned management strategy. The primary clinical outcome occurred in two (6%) of 33 participants randomly assigned to medical management and surgery (8·0%, 95% CI 2·0-32·1 per year) and in two (6%) of 34 participants randomly assigned to medical management alone (7·5%, 1·9-30·1 per year). Investigators reported no deaths, no serious adverse events, one protocol violation, and 61 protocol deviations.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>This pilot phase trial exceeded its recruitment target, but a definitive trial will require extensive international engagement.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>National Institute for Health and Care Research.</p>","PeriodicalId":17989,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Neurology","volume":" ","pages":"565-576"},"PeriodicalIF":46.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lancet Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(24)00096-6","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The highest priority uncertainty for people with symptomatic cerebral cavernous malformation is whether to have medical management and surgery or medical management alone. We conducted a pilot phase randomised controlled trial to assess the feasibility of addressing this uncertainty in a definitive trial.

Methods: The CARE pilot trial was a prospective, randomised, open-label, assessor-blinded, parallel-group trial at neuroscience centres in the UK and Ireland. We aimed to recruit 60 people of any age, sex, and ethnicity who had mental capacity, were resident in the UK or Ireland, and had a symptomatic cerebral cavernous malformation. Computerised, web-based randomisation assigned participants (1:1) to medical management and surgery (neurosurgical resection or stereotactic radiosurgery) or medical management alone, stratified by the neurosurgeon's and participant's consensus about the intended type of surgery before randomisation. Assignment was open to investigators, participants, and carers, but not clinical outcome event adjudicators. Feasibility outcomes included site engagement, recruitment, choice of surgical management, retention, adherence, data quality, clinical outcome event rate, and protocol implementation. The primary clinical outcome was symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage or new persistent or progressive non-haemorrhagic focal neurological deficit due to cerebral cavernous malformation or surgery during at least 6 months of follow-up. We analysed data from all randomly assigned participants according to assigned management. This trial is registered with ISRCTN (ISRCTN41647111) and has been completed.

Findings: Between Sept 27, 2021, and April 28, 2023, 28 (70%) of 40 sites took part, at which investigators screened 511 patients, of whom 322 (63%) were eligible, 202 were approached for recruitment, and 96 had collective uncertainty with their neurosurgeon about whether to have surgery for a symptomatic cerebral cavernous malformation. 72 (22%) of 322 eligible patients were randomly assigned (mean recruitment rate 0·2 [SD 0·25] participants per site per month) at a median of 287 (IQR 67-591) days since the most recent symptomatic presentation. Participants' median age was 50·6 (IQR 38·6-59·2) years, 68 (94%) of 72 participants were adults, 41 (57%) were female, 66 (92%) were White, 56 (78%) had a previous intracranial haemorrhage, and 28 (39%) had a previous epileptic seizure. The intended type of surgery before randomisation was neurosurgical resection for 19 (26%) of 72, stereotactic radiosurgery for 44 (61%), and no preference for nine (13%). Baseline clinical and imaging data were complete for all participants. 36 participants were randomly assigned to medical management and surgery (12 to neurosurgical resection and 24 to stereotactic radiosurgery) and 36 to medical management alone. Three (4%) of 72 participants withdrew, one was lost to follow-up, and one declined face-to-face follow-up, leaving 67 (93%) retained at 6-months' clinical follow-up. 61 (91%) of 67 participants with follow-up adhered to the assigned management strategy. The primary clinical outcome occurred in two (6%) of 33 participants randomly assigned to medical management and surgery (8·0%, 95% CI 2·0-32·1 per year) and in two (6%) of 34 participants randomly assigned to medical management alone (7·5%, 1·9-30·1 per year). Investigators reported no deaths, no serious adverse events, one protocol violation, and 61 protocol deviations.

Interpretation: This pilot phase trial exceeded its recruitment target, but a definitive trial will require extensive international engagement.

Funding: National Institute for Health and Care Research.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
症状性脑海绵状畸形(CARE)的内科处理和外科手术与单纯内科处理:一项可行性研究和随机、开放、务实的试验性阶段试验。
背景:对于有症状的脑海绵状畸形患者来说,最优先考虑的不确定性问题是,是进行药物治疗和手术,还是仅进行药物治疗。我们开展了一项试验阶段随机对照试验,以评估在最终试验中解决这一不确定性的可行性:CARE试验是一项前瞻性、随机、开放标签、评估者盲法、平行组试验,在英国和爱尔兰的神经科学中心进行。我们的目标是招募60名任何年龄、性别和种族的患者,他们都具有精神行为能力,居住在英国或爱尔兰,并患有无症状的脑海绵状畸形。根据神经外科医生和参与者在随机分配前就手术类型达成的共识,采用计算机化网络随机分配法将参与者(1:1)分配至药物治疗和手术(神经外科切除术或立体定向放射手术)或单纯药物治疗。随机分配对研究人员、参与者和护理人员开放,但不对临床结果事件评审人员开放。可行性结果包括现场参与、招募、手术治疗选择、保留率、依从性、数据质量、临床结果事件发生率和方案实施。主要临床结果是在至少 6 个月的随访期间,因脑室畸形或手术导致的无症状性颅内出血或新的持续性或进行性非出血性局灶性神经功能缺损。我们根据指定的管理方法对所有随机分配的参与者的数据进行了分析。该试验已在ISRCTN(ISRCTN41647111)注册,并已完成:2021年9月27日至2023年4月28日期间,40个地点中有28个(70%)参加了该试验,研究人员筛选了511名患者,其中322人(63%)符合条件,202人被招募,96人与他们的神经外科医生就是否对无症状脑海绵畸形进行手术存在集体不确定性。在322名符合条件的患者中,72人(22%)被随机分配(平均招募率为每月每个地点0-2[SD 0-25]名参与者),中位数为最近一次出现症状后287天(IQR 67-591)。参与者的中位年龄为 50-6 岁(IQR 38-6-59-2),72 名参与者中有 68 名(94%)为成年人,41 名(57%)为女性,66 名(92%)为白人,56 名(78%)曾有过颅内出血,28 名(39%)曾有过癫痫发作。72人中有19人(26%)在随机化前打算接受神经外科切除手术,44人(61%)打算接受立体定向放射外科手术,9人(13%)没有选择。所有参与者的基线临床和影像学数据都是完整的。36 名参与者被随机分配接受药物治疗和手术治疗(12 人接受神经外科切除术,24 人接受立体定向放射外科手术),36 人仅接受药物治疗。72名参与者中有3人(4%)退出,1人失去随访机会,1人拒绝面对面随访,剩下67人(93%)保留了6个月的临床随访。在接受随访的 67 名参与者中,61 人(91%)坚持了指定的管理策略。在随机分配接受药物治疗和手术的 33 名参与者中,有 2 人(6%)出现了主要临床结果(8-0%,95% CI 2-0-32-1 per year);在随机分配接受单纯药物治疗的 34 名参与者中,有 2 人(6%)出现了主要临床结果(7-5%,1-9-30-1 per year)。研究人员报告称,该试验无死亡病例、无严重不良事件、1 例违反方案行为和 61 例偏离方案行为:这一试验阶段的试验超过了招募目标,但最终试验需要广泛的国际参与:国家健康与护理研究所
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Lancet Neurology
Lancet Neurology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
58.70
自引率
1.00%
发文量
572
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Lancet Neurology is the world-leading clinical neurology journal. It publishes original research that advocates for change in, or sheds light on, neurological clinical practice. The topics covered include cerebrovascular disease, Alzheimer's disease and other dementias, epilepsy, migraine, neurological infections, movement disorders, multiple sclerosis, neuromuscular disorders, peripheral nerve disorders, pediatric neurology, sleep disorders, and traumatic brain injury. The journal publishes a range of article types, including Articles (including randomized clinical trials and meta-analyses), Review, Rapid Review, Comment, Correspondence, and Personal View. It also publishes Series and Commissions that aim to shape and drive positive change in clinical practice and health policy in areas of need in neurology. The Lancet Neurology is an internationally trusted source of clinical, public health, and global health knowledge. It has an Impact Factor of 48.0, making it the top-ranked clinical neurology journal out of 212 journals worldwide.
期刊最新文献
On how a brain beholds beauty. Equitable access to levetiracetam for people with epilepsy. Evobrutinib in multiple sclerosis: challenges and unmet goals. Frailty for neurologists: perspectives on how frailty influences care planning. Learning to be an adult with a disability.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1