A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials on the Effects of Photobiomodulation Therapy on Running Performance.

Q1 Health Professions International journal of exercise science Pub Date : 2024-03-01 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01
Ana Paula DO Nascimento, Adriano Valmozino DA Silva, Juliano Casonatto, Andreo Fernando Aguiar
{"title":"A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials on the Effects of Photobiomodulation Therapy on Running Performance.","authors":"Ana Paula DO Nascimento, Adriano Valmozino DA Silva, Juliano Casonatto, Andreo Fernando Aguiar","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To conduct a meta-analysis to investigate the effects of Photobiomodulation (PBM) therapy on running performance.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>PBM has recently been advocated as a valuable non-pharmacological ergogenic strategy, however, the efficacy of PBM on running performance remains unproven.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A computerized literature search was conducted until June 2023. The databases searched were PubMed/Medline, Embase, Scopus, SPORTDiscus, and Web of Science. Inclusion/exclusion criteria were determined through the PICO process. The running variables analyzed were time-trial or time-to-exhaustion. Results were combined with the standardized mean differences (SMD) and the 95% confidence intervals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. No significant effects in favor of PBM were found (SMD = 0.13; <i>p</i> = 0.11). There was no effect considering the presence (SMD = 0.16; <i>p</i> = 0.38) and absence (SMD = 0.11; <i>p</i> = 0.25) of training, and there was no dose-response effect (<i>p</i> = 0.82).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings indicate that PBM alone or combined with a training program does not improve running performance in terms of time-trial and time-to-exhaustion testing. More studies involving PBM plus training and doses higher than 1000 J are needed to determine if PBM is effective in improving running performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":14171,"journal":{"name":"International journal of exercise science","volume":"17 4","pages":"327-342"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11042871/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of exercise science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To conduct a meta-analysis to investigate the effects of Photobiomodulation (PBM) therapy on running performance.

Introduction: PBM has recently been advocated as a valuable non-pharmacological ergogenic strategy, however, the efficacy of PBM on running performance remains unproven.

Methods: A computerized literature search was conducted until June 2023. The databases searched were PubMed/Medline, Embase, Scopus, SPORTDiscus, and Web of Science. Inclusion/exclusion criteria were determined through the PICO process. The running variables analyzed were time-trial or time-to-exhaustion. Results were combined with the standardized mean differences (SMD) and the 95% confidence intervals.

Results: Twelve studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. No significant effects in favor of PBM were found (SMD = 0.13; p = 0.11). There was no effect considering the presence (SMD = 0.16; p = 0.38) and absence (SMD = 0.11; p = 0.25) of training, and there was no dose-response effect (p = 0.82).

Conclusion: Our findings indicate that PBM alone or combined with a training program does not improve running performance in terms of time-trial and time-to-exhaustion testing. More studies involving PBM plus training and doses higher than 1000 J are needed to determine if PBM is effective in improving running performance.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于光生物调节疗法对跑步成绩影响的随机对照试验的元分析。
目的: 对光生物调节疗法(PBM)对跑步成绩的影响进行荟萃分析:进行一项荟萃分析,研究光生物调控(PBM)疗法对跑步成绩的影响:近来,光生物调控疗法被认为是一种有价值的非药物健身策略,然而,光生物调控疗法对跑步成绩的影响仍未得到证实:方法:对截至 2023 年 6 月的文献进行了计算机检索。检索的数据库包括 PubMed/Medline、Embase、Scopus、SPORTDiscus 和 Web of Science。通过 PICO 流程确定了纳入/排除标准。分析的跑步变量为时间试验或耗尽时间。结果与标准化平均差(SMD)和 95% 置信区间相结合:结果:12 项研究符合纳入标准。结果:12 项研究符合纳入标准,没有发现有利于 PBM 的明显效果(SMD = 0.13;P = 0.11)。考虑到存在(SMD = 0.16;p = 0.38)和不存在(SMD = 0.11;p = 0.25)培训,没有发现效果,也没有发现剂量反应效应(p = 0.82):我们的研究结果表明,在计时测试和耗竭时间测试方面,PBM 单独或与训练计划相结合并不能提高跑步成绩。要确定 PBM 是否能有效提高跑步成绩,还需要更多涉及 PBM 加训练和剂量高于 1000 J 的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International journal of exercise science
International journal of exercise science Health Professions-Occupational Therapy
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Effects of Mental Fatigue Induced by the Stroop Test on Muscular Endurance Performance and Neuromuscular Activation in Division III Female Athletes. Validity, Reliability, and Sensitivity of a Commercially Available Velocity Measuring Device When Performing Selected Exercises. Effects of Different Warm-up Protocols on the Cardiopulmonary Responses to Exercise Testing in Youth. Relative Age Effect for Different Playing Positions in Adolescent Female Volleyball Players. A Comparison of Achilles Tendon Morphological Characteristics Based Upon VISA-A Score in Active Adults Over Age 50.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1